As a former co-chair of Bernie Sanders’s 2020 campaign with clear presidential ambitions himself, Congressman Ro Khanna is an unlikely champion of techno-capitalism. The left flank of the Democratic Party has grown deeply skeptical of the tech industry—especially in recent years as many of its leaders have drifted rightward. While that skepticism is understandable, the wholesale villainization of tech also puts progressives at odds with an American electorate that still values economic growth, much of which has been driven by big-tech innovation and market gains. For all of Bernie Sanders’s enduring appeal and renewed relevance in a post-2024 political landscape, his lack of a coherent vision for the private sector has long limited his reach among families more concerned with economic prosperity than the purity of economic justice.
In Dignity in a Digital Age, Khanna sketches a pragmatic third way — one that “insists that democratic values guide [the tech industry’s] development, accessibility, commitment to fairness, and boundaries.” He draws a compelling contrast between the independent, risk-taking, world-changing ethos of Silicon Valley and the cautious, consensus-driven incrementalism of Washington, D.C. His case is that both forces — innovation and guardrails — are essential for national vitality.
At his most persuasive, Khanna reframes the Sanders agenda as a catalyst for small-business innovation. “Medicare for All is pro-business,” he argues, freeing entrepreneurs from the need to cling to day jobs for health coverage and sparing start-ups from crushing premiums before they ever generate revenue. He also channels a Lina-Khan-style vision of curbing monopolistic power in tech to benefit consumers and small business. At his least persuasive, Khanna drifts toward idealistic prescriptions — such as decentralized tech hubs meant to spread innovation across the country — that sound good on paper but feel unlikely to materialize given the lack of near-term political incentives.
Still, Khanna stands out as the only progressive leader who truly understands Silicon Valley from the inside out. His geographic and intellectual proximity gives him credibility few on the left can match. It’s telling that even Elon Musk — who regularly mocks Sanders — has called Khanna a “sensible moderate.” The deeper question for the progressive movement is whether it’s willing to court and negotiate with the tech establishment, which Khanna has suggested, rather than simply condemn it. Can the left articulate a vision of shared success that keeps Big Tech from spending hundreds of millions in opposition while still holding firm on accountability and fairness? Khanna’s book doesn’t solve that dilemma, but it might offer the first real blueprint for trying.
The book could certainly be tighter and more concise, but the ideas and courage of forging a third way deserves five stars.