I had trouble rating this book - the material is incredibly relevant to today; the author writes in a clear style; and the man under investigation has several interesting characteristics applicable and worth the effort to digest. However, the disadvantages of the mixture of first wanting to get every part of his life included in a great amount of detail, and second the economy of words that such a small books requires makes me in the end desiring more.
But before all that, lest I make it seem like a book not worth reading, let me first explain the blessings of this book. The book details the life, theology, and passion of a man I've never heard of, even as a Presbyterian - Thomas Chalmers. For those who know Presbyterian history, he was the first moderator of the Free Church of Scotland, which broke from the established (Presbyterian-ish) Church of Scotland. But his life is relevant beyond this historically significant point, especially in his understanding of the Church's role in "public life." That is, inside the church speaking outward, the church ought not to be afraid of speaking to social ills and sins, but sins in not being bold in the proclamation of Biblical truth against them. Also, as the church living in a world poor in outward means and yet sinfully not poor in spirit, we ought to bless our communities through a lively deaconate ministry. For a man so full of energy, he was remarkably delegating - he depended upon his elders and deacons, as well as those in the office of common believer, to reach those often in abject poverty. Where the current world expects disinterested government from thousands of miles away to care for the poor, Chalmers knew only the church - through the local congregations - could properly care for these poor. Not only did he argue for deaconate work and actually do it himself, but he also engaged in academic work against all who held a lofty opinion over the church of God. His boldness to be outward - tinged with his own brand of deafness to critique - was a breath of fresh air. Today, the church is more inward than ever before - at least it seems so to me - and Chalmer's is a helpful corrective to this tendency
Now, on to the explaination of why this book left me a bit frustrated.
There are several themes worth exploring in this book that the author could not from how small his publisher (I imagine) demanded the work to be. First, the fascinating interaction of church and state that Chalmers had to swim in and out of, and especially the establishment principle and how he could helpfully correct our sociology and social gospels; Second, the reinvigorated deaconate and eldership in Chalmer's ministry focus, and all the details therein (especially the public response to it, which he often alluded to, but I didn't ever quite understand their criticisms); third, lay involvement in ministry; and forth, his understanding of "public ministry" or "public theology" (it's modern chique name), which we're rightly skeptical of today for it's overly sociological connotations.
Sandy had two chapters at the end to really discuss these things at any appropriate length, but the depth that I'm sure Sandy knows these things has not been put down on paper in the way I'm sure he would like, and I would love. I recommend this book, but I also recommend Sandy write a fuller bio, which I will promptly read!
On a side note: I know Sandy, so this was very interesting to read on that front. I could hear his voice especially in the last two chapters in his conclusions. Love you, Sandy!