Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Rights of Refugees under International Law

Rate this book
Do states have a duty to assimilate refugees to their own citizens? Are refugees entitled to freedom of movement, to be allowed to work, to have access to public welfare programs, or to be reunited with family members? Indeed, is there even a duty to admit refugees at all? This fundamentally rewritten second edition of the award-winning treatise presents the only comprehensive analysis of the human rights of refugees set by the UN Refugee Convention and international human rights law. It follows the refugee's journey from flight to solution, examining every rights issue both historically and by reference to the decisions of senior courts from around the world. Nor is this a purely doctrinal book: Hathaway's incisive legal analysis is tested against and applied to hundreds of protection challenges around the world, ensuring the relevance of this book's analysis to responding to the hard facts of refugee life on the ground.

1452 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2005

33 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
8 (44%)
4 stars
2 (11%)
3 stars
4 (22%)
2 stars
3 (16%)
1 star
1 (5%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Abdulla.
103 reviews17 followers
March 4, 2025
This concise work delivers a legally rigorous primer on refugee rights, firmly rooted in the 1951 Convention and Hathaway’s foundational frameworks. It excels in dissecting core entitlements—non-refoulement, access to work and family reunification—while integrating jurisprudential examples to trace global enforcement trends. Its accessible structure and doctrinal clarity make it a pragmatic resource for students and practitioners. Yet the text stumbles in its refusal to engage with the seismic shifts reshaping refugee law. Critical 21st-century challenges—climate displacement, AI-driven asylum vetting, and biometric surveillance—are conspicuously absent, as are analyses of modern crises (Ukraine, Rohingya, Sudan). This omission divorces the narrative from today’s geopolitical urgency. Similarly, the book sidesteps contentious debates, such as state sovereignty versus refugee rights (e.g., EU border externalisation, Australia’s offshore detention), opting instead for a surface-level critique of systemic enforcement gaps. Why do compliance failures persist? Are conventions outdated? The silence is glaring.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews