This was an interesting book, but either Havill is a poor writer, or he suffered from poor editors and/or proofreaders.
Aside from the errors in the book, this one was a bit different than the other true crime I have read. While I have no doubt that Hadden I. Clark is in fact guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted, I am left with a sense of injustice, both for Mr. Clark, and for Mr. Truitt, known throughout most of the book as "Jesus," a cellmate of Mr. Clark's at Western Correction Institution in Maryland, where Mr. Truitt remains.
I believe Hadden Clark is guilty, but I also believe he is a person who is severely mentally ill, and perhaps even suffers from some form of intellectual disability. I believe, as the book demonstrates, that he would've been better served in a mental institution over a correctional facility. I do not believe Mr. Clark could be rehabilitated at this point in his life, I do believe that if he had received the proper mental health care, or any mental health care at all for that matter, many of his crimes may have been prevented. Mental illness is certainly no excuse for criminal behavior to the degree of Mr. Clark, but prison is certainly no cure.
Regarding Mr. Truitt, or "Jesus," who is still incarcerated as of the writing of this review, I feel he has been done injustice. He provided the authorities with a lot of information regarding Mr. Clark. Mr. Clark believes that Mr. Truitt is in fact the Christian savior, and therefore trusts him more than perhaps any other person on the earth, and made him want to confess his wrongdoings. Mr. Truitt cooperated with police and prison authorities, reported information to them at the risk of his own safety, and has, in fact, had to spend a long portion of his term in solitary confinement for his own protection, both from Mr. Clark and from the general population of inmates at the facility. Despite his cooperation and helpfulness in the matters regarding Mr. Clark, his probation has been denied repeatedly.
True crime is an interesting genre, and I have found that when reaching the end of a true crime work, the reader is often left with the sense that justice was served, or at least attempted to the best ability of the involved authorities. Not so with this work. The reader is left with a sense of disappointment in the authorities of the state of Maryland. While I don't feel much sympathy for Mr. Clark, he is a murderer after all, I do feel that he didn't receive fair and impartial justice. Mr. Truitt's state of affairs is almost worse, a man who committed a crime, was convicted, and has tried to make amends for that in the only ways he can, by cooperating with authorities regarding Mr. Clark. Mr. Truitt is certainly no saint, he himself took a life, I do feel that he is more deserving of sympathy from the reader, and perhaps also from the Department of Corrections of the state of Maryland, which seems to ignore and discount the ways in which he has assisted authorities over his many years in a correctional institution.
Read for yourself, should you care to, and see what conclusions you come to for yourself.