Reading After the Fact is, in several ways, like watching an Adam Curtis documentary: similar topics arise, like conspiracy and technology; both present a compelling history of social and political disjunction; at their best, events are juxtaposed in novel ways, creating an exhilirating sense of jamais-vu.
The comparison isn't total, however, as Gilroy-Ware does a number of things differently (and sometimes better). Curtis usually sticks to the descriptive and historical, whereas Gilroy-Ware complements strong storytelling with a richer theoretical knowledge and compelling arguments.
Some or much of the content will be familiar to those, especially on the left, who have followed British and American politics, and this includes parts of the book's analysis. Yet Gilroy-Ware has a knack for taking such events and discourse and either taking them a step further or entirely reshaping them.