This is a very interesting look into 1950s Charleston, West Virginia, and a murder mystery that remains unsolved. The book is lengthy, but reads fast, and contains a lot of interesting information about the case and potential suspects. It could have benefited from a strong editor, but I understand an updated edition could be in the works because of additional information obtained since publication of the book.
Although I was born and grew up in Charleston, WV, I was only a year and a half old when this murder occurred and I don't remember hearing anything about it as a child. The names are all familiar - we subscribed to both papers (the Gazette and the Daily Mail), bought our cameras and film at Merrill Photo, and later attended events at the Clay Center. However, I did not hear about this brutal murder until a neighbor heard about it and bought copies of the book for several of us in our neighborhood to read so we could talk about it! The story reads like a novel from the pen of Dashiell Hammett but is sadly true and affected the lives of many prominent citizens of Charleston. The mystery lives on today with missing files and unfulfilled Freedom of Information requests from the authors to current city officials. After reading the book, I have my own thoughts about who the murderer was, but no one will know for sure unless the evidence file shows up in some forgotten corner of the Courthouse or someone's home. The authors have meticulously laid out not only the sequence of events leading up to the murder, but they provide extensive, well-researched background for all the families involved and an Afterword that details what happened to specific individuals following the initial investigations. I highly recommend this book for anyone interested in true crime or in West Virginia history.
The true account of the unsolved, 1953 killing of Julia Staunton Clay, owner of the Charleston Daily Mail. Well-liked and hardworking, Ms. Clay was a prominent socialite as well as astute businesswoman in West Virginia. She was found bludgeoned to death by her housekeeper and her chauffer-handyman. There was no sign of forced entry or robbery. Her neighbors heard nothing. Her 3-year-old grandson, whom she was keeping because her daughter was in the hospital, was asleep in his bedroom.
The Charleston PD, under the direction of the colorful mayor Copenhaver, could never find any evidence to convict anyone. The investigation finally stopped.
While an easy read because the authors used both primary and secondary sources in addition to their interviews with the family and others involved in the investigation, it still never gave any clue as to what happened that night. Her family still has no closure nearly 70 years later.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Interesting information but difficult to follow. If you decide to read the book (which I would encourage if you are interested in the subject), I suggest making a family tree to help you remember the details and relationship of each person.
This was not the book for me. It seems to be more rumor, gossip, and innuendo with a touch of "Who's Who" thrown into the mix than actual true crime and investigation. I finished the book just as confused as when I started.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
An interesting read about an unsolved murder of the owner of the Charleston Daily Mail in the 1950’s. Probably more interesting to me bc it takes place back home in WV.
Although this story is interesting, the book itself could have benefited from some cuts. The entire columns and articles referenced did not need to be included, just the relevant quotes. And the large focus on Mrs. Clark's two husbands was not needed. After all, she was twice a widow by the time of her murder.
Quotes "It is said that journalism is instant history that is ruled by deadlines."
"However, when she began researching the Clark murder, Reader said Kay [a reporter with the Charleston Gazette] was told to stop her research-there would be no story."
"It is plausible, some say, that there may well have been, during the decades following the Clark case, an ongoing cover-up by authorities and prominent citizens of Charleston that was meant to protect people and reputations-something the Gazette seemed to have believed. Certainly there seemed to be, at various times, manipulation of the investigation. If the Clark file could be found, Detective Westfall says, police documentation of the case would undoubtedly add additional information to the unsolved murder, perhaps pointing to the individual who killed Juliet Clark."