One of the world's most gruesome and notorious criminal partnerships ran its horrific course in Edinburgh during the year 1828. Many myths surround the case of Burke and Hare, and several important questions remain unanswered. In this re-investigation the author seeks to set the record straight and present a complete and accurate account of the activities of the two ruthless serial killers and their culpable associates. What were the circumstances which allowed Burke and Hare to carry out their rupulsive trade undetected for so long and at the cost of so many innocent lives? What were the roles of their common-law wives and the medical students who aided and abetted them? Above all, what should be the final judgement on Dr. Robert Knox, the distinguished teacher of anatomy whose dissecting table was the final resting place of many victims. As the sordid tale unfolds, we discover the truth about a uniquely abhorrent climate of unprincipled arrogance in high society and fiendish predatoriness in low life, each dependent on the other.
Це – опис історичного випадку, на якому заснований “The Body Snatcher” Стівенсона. Отже, 1820-ті, Единбург – важливий центр медичної освіти, але трупи для анатомічних лекцій і далі легально добути проблематично. Один із найвидатніших педагогів, такий собі Доктор Нокс, не тільки ім’я має, як головне зло у фільмі за коміксами – а й виглядає так само: “Knox presented a stiff upright figure, balding prematurely, with powerful shoulders and long arms. He had lost his left eye, which had atrophied as a result of smallpox in his infancy, leaving an empty socket. His students naturally nicknamed him ‘Old Cyclops’. [...] He was flamboyant in his dress, with gold chains, diamond rings and embroidered waistcoats, all of which served to distract attention from his ravaged features. ‘Knox,’ said his biographer, ‘in the highest style of fashion, with spotless linen, frill, and lace, and jewellery redolent of a duchess’s boudoir, standing in a classroom amid osseous forms, cadavera, and decaying mortalities, was a sight to behold, and one assuredly never to be forgotten.” Поведінкою теж намагається відповідати цьому високому образу: щоб забезпечити студентів належною кількістю трупів для розтинів, платить за трупи більше, ніж усі колеги, і не ставить зайвих питань, навіть коли трупи приносять із явними слідами насильницької смерті. Цим користаються такі собі Берк & Гер, які мордують і здають на розтин 16 осіб. Питання до провенансу, так би мовити, їхнього товару постають майже одразу – скажімо, хтось зі студентів упізнає замордовану проститутку, яка, з його досвіду, от щойно була жива і здорова – але доктор Нокс все одно не ставить постачальникам зайвих питань, а красиву вбиту дівчину наказує помістити у скляну банку всім на огляд і на радість (автор пише: “Necrophilia, it seems, superseded medical science for a time on Dr Knox’s premises”). І так триває цілий академічний рік, доки Берк & Гер не пускаються берегів здорового глузду остаточно. Їх арештовують, Берка страчують і теж пускають на розтин, а доктор Нокс продовжує бути найуспішнішим викладачем медицини в Единбурзі, геппі енд, отака правдива готична жахалочка.
(Книжка містить також тогочасні документи, пов’язані зі справою – зізнання, полемічні трактати і т.д.)
3.5 stars- this was a great insight to the crimes committed by Burke and Hare. I would like to give it the full 5 stars, but it got a bit repetitive at times.
Bar the murder victims, nobody was truly innocent but these crimes did become a necessary evil for modern medicine. It does make you think if Knox and other anatomists did rely on resurrection men or murders, where would we be today?
This book explored the infamous murder spree of Burke and Hare in Edinburgh in 1828; these two men murdered sixteen people in order to earn money from anatomists looking for fresh bodies for teaching purposes. Prior to reading this, I had only heard tales of B&H, and I was surprised to find that their reputation as “resurrection men” or “graverobbers” is entirely untrue. They never bothered to dig up corpses; they simply killed the most convenient victims. I also believed that both B&H were executed for their crimes. However, Hare turned King’s Evidence, told all about Burke’s being the lead murderer; only Burke was hanged. Hare then was released entirely free of any punishment for his part in these serial murders. The writer was a bit choppy in his style, but the essential facts were well-presented.
This was a well researched and fascinating look at the story of Burke and Hare, which engages with contemporary evidence and various theorists and yet maintains a horror narrative feel - at least for the most part. It does tend to get a little repetitive and include whole sources in the appendix is a bit much as the author does a thorough job in quoting from them throughout the book.
Actually a 3.5 (c'mon, goodreads, let us give half stars...!)... This is basically just a straight account of the murders committed by Burke and Hare and the trial of Burke. It's not a bad book, just a fairly basic one (though the Appendices at the end are interesting). Not one to read if you are looking for any analysis of the bigger picture, but a decent book nevertheless.
don't usually read non-fiction books, was more to try and borrow on new ereader from the library.It is interesting, but I found it at times a little bit confusing. Still I read it all and it's ok.
Forgot I read this until I started reading the Dickensian book by Sheri Holman called The Dress Lodger and so glad I had as I understand the hysteria of the time. Both excellent reads