There’s a very interesting idea behind Names of the Women. The history of the Christian church has been written by men, but it is clear from even a superficial reading of the New Testament, that there are many women involved in the story. Most of these women disappear into the background and even many of those that feature as individuals are not named. This book names fifteen women and tells their stories. It does this via a mixture of Biblical evidence, church tradition and imagination. In some ways, I have to say that the author here was, when I was reading the book, preaching to converted because I have been involved in the Christian church for 50 years and have, as far as I remember, always considered the women in the story to be key. However, it is definitely true that scant detail is provided in the Bible for most of these women and some who Thayil picks up on are ignored completely.
Some of the women are well known, even outside of Christianity. Mary, mother of Jesus, for example. Or Mary of Magdala. Some might require a working knowledge of the New Testament. The widow who dropped two mites into a collection box, for example. Some might require you to have had exposure to specific church traditions. Jesus’ two older sisters would be the prime example here. As I say, I have been a Christian for 50 of my 60 years, so I had a bit of head start. I couldn’t guess the name of every woman, but this is because they do not have names recorded anywhere and Thayil has imagined names for them here, but I did manage to place all of them in the story fairly quickly in their respective chapters.
We start at the crucifixion. As Jesus hangs on the cross, he speaks to Mary and we then jump forward a few days to Mary’s experience of the risen Jesus and her frustration at the men (his disciples) who will not believe her story but who then appropriate it once they have seen for themselves.
Later, on the next day and the days to come, when they tell the story of the risen body, they will paint themselves as brave men who went to the tomb to see for themselves. They will leave out the story of the woman who was first to enter the tomb. But they will not be able to erase completely the name of the woman.
The we meet Susanna the Barren who follows two men on the road to Emmaus where they encounter the risen Jesus. The men fail to understand what is happening and it takes an intervention by Susanna to explain things. And we read:
WIth the passing of time the elders of the Church will ignore or forget his teaching with respect to women. They will build the Church on the witness of the women but they will refuse to record their names.
But this they cannot change, that the risen Christ appeared first to Mary of Magdala and it was the women who were the first leaders of the Church.
From there, a large part of the book works gradually backwards in time identifying women who have been ignored to one degree or another by church history. These early chapters have set the context for the book: the women who have been written out by male-dominated history have something to teach us and we need to hear their stories.
Some of the chapters have mixed timelines, but the general thrust of each one, for most of the book, takes us a bit further back. Towards the end of the book, this approach changes and the timelines becomes more mixed. This works less well for me: I preferred reading the book when there was a sense of (backwards) progression to each chapter.
But, so far so good. This idea of recovering the stories of the women in the Gospels feels challenging and thought-provoking.
However, there is a second idea very much at work as these women’s stories are told. The “cover up” that has led to these women being ignored has, at the same time, radically altered the message that Jesus taught. What the (male dominated) Church has been promulgating for 2000 years is a corrupted version of the truth. Interspersed among the stories of the women, we read of Jesus talking to Mary as he hangs on the cross. He is delivering a message that has been ignored by the church as the women have been written out of the story.
Despite my decades of living as a Christian, I would not claim that this is an entirely false position. It is hard to believe that 2000 years of human interpretation has not in some places changed the message. It is all too human to interpret things in a way that suits us. In fact, it is hard to do otherwise. We see this in our own relatively recent history that has used the Bible to justify wars, slavery and subjugation of women (for example).
But it is a big leap, for me, to get to the Jesus presented in this book. Here we have a Jesus who says
…for I want you to listen as I say to you that forgiveness is the recourse of the weak and we must not forgive.
Here we have a Jesus who is weakened because power leaves him when he performs miracles, who has a thirst for fame and renown, who makes sarcastic jokes at the expense of his disciples, who is talked into reluctantly resurrecting a man by the man’s two sisters (a miracle which all involved almost immediately regret, especially Lazarus, the man resurrected, who turns to drink because he cannot cope).
This is challenging stuff. The men in this book do not fare well. The Jesus presented in this book does not seem to be the kind of person who would attract thousands of followers during his life and billions afterwards. (But then, the “billions afterwards” are following the Jesus presented by the male-dominated version of the story.)
Overall, I found this to be a very uneven book. It started out challengingly and started to draw me in. The stories of the women are challenging and interesting. I struggle with the Jesus it presents, but I acknowledge this might just be 50 years of programming in my brain. If it had just been the stories of the women, it could easily have been a 4 or 5 star book for me, but the interpretation of the men in the book, especially Jesus, made it a struggle for me.
3.5 stars rounded down for now.
My thanks to the publisher for an ARC via NetGalley.