【A Natural Perspective / Northrop Frye / Columbia University Press, 1965】
Here's a violent maxim everybody knows but are really reluctant to accept: writing plays are, under some certain circumstances, surprisingly easy.
To our knowledge, Edward Albee found writing plays, including one of the biggest hits of 20th century, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, possible without planning, and Sam Shepard didn't know anything else than Waiting for Godot. One can write a play without taking care of anything - if you were under 'some certain circumstances.'
Frye pointed out some knacks to get in that kind of trance by analysing Shakespeare.
--This is particularly true if a dramatist who, like Shakespeare, refrains from trying to impose any sort of personal attitude on us, and shows no interest in anything except his play. (P34, 2)
--Shakespeare's impartiality is a totally involved and committed impartiality: it expresses itself in bringing everything equally to life. (P44, 2)
--The irrational or anticomic society mai be clearly defined in its social aims, like the one in Love's Labour's Lost, but the new society that is formed in the last moments of the comedy never is: (P75, 3)
--His (note: a clown / fool's ) enthusiasm is all the more generous in that he has just been sharply rebuked by the ladies for not being obscene in an upper-class way, as they are. (P94, 3)
--Some of the most haunting speeches in Shakespeare are connected with these shifts of perspective provided by alienated characters. (P101, 3)
--Thus the irrational law represents the comic equivalent of a social contract, something we must enter into if the final society is to take shape. (P121, 4)
Even though the shadow of mystical theory held by Frye augments by the conclusion (represented by his dwelling on seasonal cycle and its parallel to theater), it's still a cooling down read for those who'd think of theater at present. And yes, for my academic discipline, too.