Garthine Walker combines a quantitative and qualitative approach to investigate the interrelationship between gender, socioeconomic background, and criminality in Cheshire, England between the 1590s and 1660s. Her comparative reading of the legal documents and the narrative sources, e.g. found in the contemporaneous pamphlets and treatises, demonstrates how the popular discourses about women, virile pride, and fixed expectations about both genders informed the English subjects' understanding of justice and usage of the law. Her nuanced analysis of the criminal records involving female criminality offers alternative explanations for the underrepresentation of women in such documents. For example, she argues that disruptive feminine actions were often silenced, ridiculed, or depicted as inconsequential because they hurt or interfered with the honor of men. Moreover, she demonstrates that the law itself evolved in a way to treat women differently than men, although not necessarily to the detriment of the former. In my opinion, Walker's larger claim that the volatile political attitude towards the English monarchy transformed, through the state-household analogy, the general societal attitude regarding how the women should conduct themselves within the patriarchal household, is beguiling, yet not quite apparent from the evidence provided by her. Overall, Walker approaches the question of female criminality through the vantage point of the household and domesticity, which she regards as central to the early woman's daily life. She convincingly and innovatively argues that the contemporaneous philosophical, ethical, as well as legal discourses all centered on the concept of the household, both as the nuclear societal unit that needed to be preserved and as the framework by which the early-modern woman's activity and role in society were delineated.