This book has shown readers about the numerous flaws of statistics in understanding public issues. Some statistics may be useful, but many can be doubtful in producing meaningful social 'facts'. Instead, they can be prefabricated. Several examples can be given: (a) the underrepresented group of voters in cities, (c) girls having anorexia, (c) the rising income gap in society, and so on. A part of the problem is that the production involves a process in which contentious issues are still in debate. Therefore, Best (the author) argues that readers should be critical when confronted with factual numbers described as statistics.
Some aspects are involved in the statistical process. First, public issues are where problems are viewed in the ideological values. Different values exist and are unlikely to resolve as they are often contradictory. Second, the technical aspect of the statistical methodology needs to be scrutinised for am accountability. Some statistics require further examination of sampling methods, data collection techniques and selection of research questions. Third, statistics serve a specific purpose for particular individuals/organisations. Raders must be aware of the agenda endorsed, sources of funds, and short-term interests of these parties.
At the end of the book, Best reminds us that a critical approach to statistics is intended to increase the usefulness of statistics in solving societal problems. Otherwise, society is trapped in less meaningful numbers, deception of others' agendas, and deviation from reality. By suggesting these, the author recommends more than efforts to improve statistical literacy.