What do Mae West, John F. Kennedy, Victor Hugo, and H. L. Mencken have in common? They all indulged in chiasmus-a literary device in which word order is reversed to hilarious or poignant effect. When Mae West said, "It's not the men in my life, it's the life in my men," she was using chiasmus; when John F. Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country," he was doing the same. Dr. Mardy Grothe has compiled hundreds of examples of chiasmus in this whimsically illustrated collection, bringing this witty and thought-provoking device out of obscurity and into the public imagination.
First Things First (But Not Necessarily in That Order)
The subject matter of this short, fun book (though it's more an appetiser than a meal) is chiasmus, of which its title is a great example.
But, first, how do you pronounce it? That's easy:
"ky-AZ-mus"
The Meaning of Chiasmus
Second things second. What does this weird looking word mean?
Here are some definitions:
"A reversal in the order of words in two otherwise parallel phrases." (OED)
"In rhetoric, chiasmus (Latin term from Greek χίασμα, "crossing", from the Greek χιάζω, chiázō, "to shape like the letter Χ") is the figure of speech in which two or more clauses are related to each other through a reversal of structures in order to make a larger point; that is, the clauses display inverted parallelism." (wiki)
The reversal of the phrases or clauses is important.
If there are two words in each phrase and they are reversed, then Dr Mardy represents the reversal as an X, a crossing or a criss-cross.
In the book title, the words "fool" and "kiss" are reversed or criss-crossed.
There's a more detailed explanation on the author's website:
When I was watching a movie with my dad, I told him I hate when sentences are flipped on themselves and couldn’t think of a word for them. He apparently had a book full of them and they’re called chaismuses. I groan when I hear them but some are nice little nuggets of wisdom. Writing a review so I remember what these types of sentenced are called later
Apparently, I'm a total language geek, because I saw this book and had to read it. This one focuses on chiasmus, which is a literary device that switches word order to impact meaning. There are tons of them, but a few are so well done (like the title, and JFK's "Ask you country") that they end up as quite memorable. Here are a few of my favs:
"Those who mind, don't matter. Those who matter, don't mind." - Bernard Baruch
"The stage can be defined as a place where Shakespeare murdered Hamlet and a great many Hamlets murdered Shakespeare." - Robert Morse
"Political freedom cannot exist in any land where religion controls the state, and religious freedom cannot exist in any land where the state controls religion." - Sam Ervin, Jr.
"With Congress - every time they make a joke, it's a law. And every time they make a law, it's a joke." - Will Rogers
And a slightly naughty one from the glorious Mae West: "A good man is hard to find, and a hard man is good to find."
This book was somewhat odd to read, as it is mostly lots of chiastic phrases. However, the author places them in context and gives you information about how they have been used to great effect over the years by thousands of people - philosophers, comedians, politicians, and many others. My favorite chiasmus from the book comes from Blaise Pascal: Earthly things must be known to be loved; divine things must be loved to be known. A fun book, but really best read in snippets since there is no story line.
I adore wordplay, so any book about wordplay is going to thrill me. There were a lot of good examples of chiasmus (otherwise known as inverted parallelism). The second half of the book the examples were less witty but it was still worth the 62 cents I paid on Amazon to get it.
This book is fabulously fun. I picked it up and didn't set it down until I was finished. Anyone who likes to write should read this book. It is a definate read it again and again. Some examples are explicit and rude therefore I can't reccommend it without a caution, but I do recommend it.
Hilarious and simply witty. My only dislike is patriarchal notions and objectification of women that came from some well-meaning jokes. Aside from this oppression, I thoroughly enjoyed the book.