Dr. Griffin, a retired emeritus professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology at the Claremont School of Theology, has published over 30 books and 150 articles. His 9/11 books have been endorsed by Robert Baer, William Christison, William Sloane Coffin Jr., Richard Falke, Ray McGovern, Paul Craig Roberts and Howard Zinn.
This is the 5th book that I have read by this author and 10th on the subject. If, like me and so many thousands of people all over the world, you suspect that the official story of what happened on 9-11 (The 9-11 Commission Report) is untrue, then read David Ray Griffin on the subject. His is the clearest and most articulate voice of the 9-11 Truth Movement. One caveat - researching this subject can be compelling and addictive - and depressing. The biggest lie ever sold. One of the greatest crimes in history. Demand a new investigation.
David Ray Griffin's clear presentation of the evidence, along with his insight and critical analysis, show the 9/11 Commission Report to be what it is--a total fabrication as untrustworthy as The Warren Report. If only the U.S. Congress and mainstream press had Mr. Griffin's courage and thirst for Truth, perhaps then the real perpetrators behind the false flag event known as 9/11 could be brought to justice. And the world would be a better place.
David Ray Griffin is one of the leading sources for truthful information about 9/11. I encourage everyone to read all of his books. They will change your perception of our government forever.
"The New Pearl Harbor Revisited" is a book based on the 9/11 Conspiracy. I had originally bought it to help me with my research project on the Conspiracy. My topic interested me alot, but the book was only average.
What I liked about the book was the topic. I am not anti America, but the evidence surrounding the 9/11 Conspiracy interests me. I can't beleive that there is a possibility that President Bush and the government were responsible for 9/11. I also enjoyed the topic because it helped me learn more about a tragic day in America that I was too young to remember. I have always wanted to learn more about the terrorist attacks on 9/11, and the book helped me alot. Another thing I liked about the book was the amount of useful information it contained. The "New Pearl Harbor Revisited" helped break down the conspiracy for me and find information for my report. It was more enjoyable to read because I knew I was getting alot out of it.
What I didn't like about the book was how confusing it was at certain parts. The book is actually a sequel to a previous book about the conspiracy, hence the word "Revisited." The author published the second book to correct incorrect statements he made in his first book, and to reveal new information he had collected. Because of this, the author referred to his old book as if the reader read it, which I had not. These parts where he referred back made the book frusturating to read. Despite an amzing topic, the book was also dry, boring, and slow moving at parts. The author was too specific, scientific, and in depth at certain points for me to really enjoy reading it for pleasure.
Some of the amazing things involving the 9/11 Conspiracy surprised me in this book. I never considered ideas like a controlled demolition for the real reason the Twin Towers collapsed, or the possibility that Flight 93 was shot down. The author also presented a lot of information to back his theories and beliefs up which made me reconsider what actually happened that day.
What impacted my thinking is the idea that the Government may have planned the attacks, or new about them in advance, and decided not to stop them. I hate imagining that our government could be responsible for the tradegy and death that occured that only for the intentions of going to war in the Middle East. It's a horrible thought, and as much as I hope it's wrong, there is a lot of evidence to back it up.
Overall, "The New Pearl Harbor Revisited" was an okay book for my intentions of collecting information for my report. If someone was interested in learning sbout the conspiracy however, I would not recomend it. The book was more designed for someone who already has background information on the 9/11 Conspiracy. Because of it's confusing and dull nature, I would rate this book two out of five stars.
I highly recommend this book to anyone who has even the slightest hint of a doubt about 9/11. You have to wonder what the Bush administration were really doing on that day