This gets five stars for Marie-Louise von Franz, James Hillman's contribution to Jungian typology are practically irrelevant in my opinion.
Von Franz does an exquisite job of delineating the inferior function in each type, how it fits within Jung's model of the psyche, its role in adult psychological growth, and useful methods on how patients can access their inferior function.
She illuminates her arguments via case histories, mythological analogy, and anecdotal observations. This is hardly a rock-solid foundation for fact, but to hell with the facts--modern science has yet to outstrip the usefulness of the Jungians' anecdotal insights, despite "Psychological Types" nearing its centennial. I would be more skeptical if I hadn't observed and applied these principles for myself, but the laboratory that is life continues to vindicate these findings.
First Hillman writing I came across, "The Feeling Function." I didn't understand as many as half the words but his writing somehow lit a fire in my capacity to imagine, and perhaps that confusion was a precise necessity to ignite the aether of the imaginal....
As always, the discussions from von Franz were insightful and clearly analyzed. The examples that she gave were also extremely helpful for one to understand the four functions and the inferior functions. Hillman's discourse on the feeling function, on the other hand, was dry and not as helpful. He did pick a difficult topic to elaborate on, but I did not feel like it added any more insights or value to the book. I would rather have had von Franz's insights on the feeling function discussed instead.
В «Лекции по юнговской типологии» входят лекции Марии-Луизы фон Франц, посвящённые подчинённой функции, и лекции Джеймса Хиллмана о конкретной чувствующей функции. Тогда как лекции фон Франц показались мне качественными и интересными, лекции Хиллмана навели тоскливое состояние и вызвали ноль резонанса, показавшись бессвязной плохой литературой, в практическом плане практически бесполезной. Маленький объём книги обманчив: тогда как фон Франц читается довольно легко, от Хиллмана засыпаешь. Как обычно, непрофессионально выполненное издание «Института общегуманитарных исследований»: плохая вёрстка, множество опечаток.
At the time, this book made advances on the unconscious (4th or inferior) function. Unlike other typology books, the information contained here mostly still holds today, probably because it is dealing with the unconscious, which is underdeveloped and so more uniform across types and times.
In addition, Marie-Louise von Franz's style and her symbloism make this work engaging in its own right. I will always remember her description of the horse as an image of the unconscious, the nose as an image of intuition, and the image of the unconsious as a room with a door on each wall in which three doors can closed but one will forever remain shut.
li esse como se fosse um romance de ficção científica. observando a minha vivência, e a vivência das pessoas ao meu redor, achei ultrapassado demais. posso mudar de opinião algum dia, quem sabe. a impressão que ficou é que, se eu for levar ao pé da letra essa teoria, vou ter que ficar correndo atrás do meu próprio rabo, colocando todo mundo em caixinhas claustrofóbicas e esmagadoras .. achei muito limitado e retrogrado. tá na hora de alguém contemporâneo re-escrever
Li como recomendação da minha psicóloga. Pedi a ela um livro de psicologia para leigos e ela me passou esse. Eu AMEI!
É um livro técnico e precisei pesquisar algumas coisas no Google para entender melhor, mas é ótimo para ter um overview da psicologia jungiana. Recomendo!!
This was a fantastic book of essays. Marie Louise von Franz's was, as usual, clear and elucidating, and Hillman's longer lecture on the feeling function was extremely valuable in clarifying what the feeling function is and how it works.
MLvF's part: 5/5. Her detailed descriptions of the types and their inferior functions led to useful insights and made me feel seen (as always with her writing).
JH's part: 4/5. Had to power through the beginning (not a fan of history), but the insight into the feeling function was incredible. I can now differentiate negative/positive feelings from superior/inferior feeling as a function – and see how they interact. I also learned more about how the mother complex and the anima/animus manifest in cognition (in the feeling function).
3.5 stars for von Franz, 2 stars for Hillman. 2.75 overall. I cannot deal with amount of psycholanalytic language that Hillman uses in the second half of his part; there's even an entire section on the mother complex!