Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Themes in British Social History

Gender in English Society, 1650-1850: The Emergence of Separate Spheres?

Rate this book
Book by Shoemaker, Robert B.

344 pages, Hardcover

First published March 6, 1998

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

W.A. Speck

24 books3 followers
William Arthur Speck (born 1938) is a British historian specializing in late 17th and 18th-century British and American history.

Speck was educated at Bradford Grammar School and The Queen's College, Oxford, gaining a BA in 1960 and a D.Phil in 1966. He is Emeritus Professor of History at the University of Leeds and a Special Professor in the School of English Studies at the University of Nottingham where he co-convenes an Interdisciplinary Eighteenth-Century Research Seminar.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (14%)
4 stars
9 (42%)
3 stars
8 (38%)
2 stars
1 (4%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Mir.
4,984 reviews5,334 followers
May 14, 2015
Shoemaker characterizes the long 18th century as marked by increased separation of male and female roles. Since the book was published 1998, this argument was hardly novel; in fact, it followed a decade of increased questioning of the adequacy of this model following the 1989 translation of Habermas' The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society and its more nuanced examination of the public/private divide. Shoemaker alludes briefly to this historiographical debate in his short conclusion but does not proceed to any in-depth conceptual discussion, perhaps because he covers the more theoretical dimensions of this subject in another work coauthored with Mary Vincent. This collection includes material by Amanda Vickery (an established critic of the separate spheres model), John Tosh, and Leonore Davidoff, Gisela Bock, Joan W. Scott, and Lyndal Roper.

I would recommend this book primarily for undergraduate history majors. Chapters are arranged thematically: sexuality, family life, religion, politics, society and culture. It is clear and easy enough to follow, although as one may guess from the preceding paragraph, somewhat dated in its lack of theoretical engagement. It also fails to discuss the feminist movement and its role in shaping this field of study -- note that "gender," as was generally the case in this period, means "women".
Profile Image for Andie .
81 reviews2 followers
May 10, 2022
So informative! I loved this!!!
(I read this through the months of January and February for my master’s dissertation)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews