I knew it would make me mad to read this book.
And I was right. But, I suppose that's a good thing.
Reading this book is designed to make you mad, to want to do something about the 'pigs at the trough' as Ariana Huffington calls them; no, not the welfare mothers with their $241/mo checks. Heck, that's small potatoes.
I'm talking about major corporate welfare here; the subsidization of millionaires and billionaires. Sounds absurd, doesn't it? Especially when you see it in black and white. I mean, what would these people need with government money when they have piles of money of their own?
What, indeed?
And yet they take it. By the handfuls, the bagfuls, the truckloads. The cataloging is precise, the figures unambiguous. Real wages for 90% of Americans have been declining over the last 30 years while corporate profits are through the roof. I was told, by one kind, compassion gentleman that, 'This is the new way, get used to it.' Of course, he was one of those corporate pirates, so should I be shocked by his flagrancy?
No one else seems to be. They shrug, and buy another IPod, or watch more reality TV.
Do I sound bitter? You bet. As a single parent, with one income, I struggle for every penny. I buy books for a quarter, not just because I love books so much but because economically - for me - that makes sense. I use the library (free) a lot, too. And I'm not saying it isn't the environmentally sensitive choice, either. I just resent being put into a forced position by someone else's rampant greed.
Did you know in this index there is no mention of philanthropy? Say what you will about the robber barons of old, but Carnegie left several endowments, trusts and libraries. Today's uber-rich spend it on themselves. Why? Because no one is telling them their greed is a bad thing; quite the contrary. We're being told their greed is a good thing because it keeps the economy afloat.
Now, you know you're screwed when you're relying on greedy rich people to keep you afloat...but I digress.
The book is a bit dry in parts, as to be expected. And the rambling, introductory anecdote about the golf course lost me and I almost gave up on the book (I can't stand golf or golf courses...I'm way too liberal and yep, see that land as future low-income housing! :P lol), but I hung in there.
It did pay off, though, in a moral sense, not just a statistical one. It pretty much put the 'no-regulation-needed' meme on permanent debunk. These guys are not more moral than most people; it's not hard work (or, if you insist *just hard work*) that got them where they are - a lot of it was bending or breaking rules, family connections, prior wealth as capital...a whole host of mitigating factors. And, not for nothing, raiding the government coffers for whatever they could get - and they usually could get quite a lot, depending on who was in power.
Sadly, the last chapter, entitled "What to do" is only 17 pages long. 17-freaking-pages. I think that says it all, don't you? The guy spent 282 pages detailing the abuses, the worst examples of greed (not even everything) and the the solution is a meager 17 pages long. But it can be boiled down to one phrase: "Watch these guys, don't trust them as far as you can throw them, and regulate, regulate, regulate."
Of course, we knew that already.