What do you think?
Rate this book
The story of Alexander before he became “the Great.”
Finished with schooling, Alexandros is appointed regent of Makedon while his father is away on campaign. He thrives with his new authority—this is the role he was born for — yet it creates conflict with his mother and Hephaistion. And when his soldiers, whom he leads with unexpected skill, start to call him “The Little King,” his father is less than delighted.
Tensions escalate between Alexandros and his father, and between Makedon and the city-states of southern Greece. As the drums of war sound, king and crown prince quarrel during their march to meet the Greeks in combat. Among other things, his father wants to know he can produce heirs, and thinks he should take a mistress, an idea Alexandros resists.
After the south is pacified, friction remains between Alexandros and the king. Hostilities explode at festivities for his father’s latest wedding, forcing Alexandros to flee in the middle of the night with his mother and Hephaistion. The rigors of exile strain his relationships, but the path to the throne will be his biggest challenge yet: a face-off for power between the talented young cub and the seasoned old lion.
Finished with schooling, Alexandros is appointed regent of Makedon while his father is away on campaign. He thrives with his new authority—this is the role he was born for — yet it creates conflict with his mother and Hephaistion. And when his soldiers, whom he leads with unexpected skill, start to call him “The Little King,” his father is less than delighted.
Tensions escalate between Alexandros and his father, and between Makedon and the city-states of southern Greece. As the drums of war sound, king and crown prince quarrel during their march to meet the Greeks in combat. Among other things, his father wants to know he can produce heirs, and thinks he should take a mistress, an idea Alexandros resists.
After the south is pacified, friction remains between Alexandros and the king. Hostilities explode at festivities for his father’s latest wedding, forcing Alexandros to flee in the middle of the night with his mother and Hephaistion. The rigors of exile strain his relationships, but the path to the throne will be his biggest challenge yet: a face-off for power between the talented young cub and the seasoned old lion.
350 pages, Kindle Edition
First published October 21, 2019
32 people are currently reading
382 people want to read
About the author
Jeanne Reames
5 books88 followersMother, writer, history professor, Homer fangirl and Alexander the Great geek. Interviewed expert for The History Channel's "Ancient Empires: Alexander the Great."
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 74 reviews
November 7, 2019
A charming account of Alexander’s rise to power and his love for his closest friend, Hephaestion
Anyone who enjoyed the first book will likely love this one, which feels more like a completed story than that did. To recap, the last one’s arc was entirely character-driven and took us from Alexander and Hephaestion’s meeting to their eventual romance. There’s more going on, but that is the spine. This time the book’s main storyline is the conflict between him and Philip during the leadup to Philip’s invasion of Persia. Anyone who knows anything about the two can guess where the book ends.
With the book moving beyond Alexander’s childhood into the much broader range of adulthood, it’s interesting to see what does and does not get focused on. There aren’t really any surprises actually. The book is still focusing on character and setting. Alexander’s personality gets a little more drawn out and he’s starting to seem a bit more like I imagine him. The pride, the stubbornness, the unending, unquenchable, relentless lust for glory. It’s all here.
His relationship with Hephaestion is still a highpoint, with the two opposites providing exactly what the other needs. It’s got to be hard being a prince and dealing with all the endless sycophants struggling to get near you. But Hephaestion loves the man, he finds the prince rather a nuisance. You can see why emotionally needy Alexander would go crazy for that. The other key relationship is between Alexander and his father. This one really breaks my heart. The two are absolutely poison to each other. One is too proud to admit his emotions, the other incapable of not doing so. And both are too stubborn to back down.
Another element that is handled very well is the loving depiction of everyday Macedonian life and society. Religion continues to be strongly presented as does the love of literature and other cultural allusions. Sexuality really kicks into overdrive. Now that Alex and Phaestas are a couple they’re screwing like rabbits. It actually gets uncomfortably explicit sometimes. What’s more interesting (at least to me; other views may vary) are the mores that come with the act. Some of which are quite bizarre. Phaestas and Al are a lot like a modern gay couple compared to the strict pederasty of the time. It’s sweet, but emotionally devastating for them to come to terms with.
What continue to get very little attention are some of the elements you might expect to see more of in Alexander’s adulthood. Elements like warfare. We do get some of course, since it would be impossible to avoid. We even get a whole chapter on Chaeroneia. But the buildup to the battle (both political and military) is hardly setting the scene for the importance of the match. And the battle itself seems detached and emotionally distant. We mainly follow Hephaestion as he stumbles around trying to hold off a single warrior. The aftermath is rather more memorable than the event. Politics is also a little sidelined, although again we do get some. Most of what we see are of the family politics variety, where the interaction between marriages and the highland/lowland clans are well handled. But of foreign affairs or the alliances between Macedon and the Greek states we’re left pretty vague.
The book’s interests are not too far from my own when reading historical fiction (people who write great battle scenes or good political maneuvering often struggle to write anything else) so this is mainly there to give fair warning to people expecting this account of one of history’s greatest conquerors to include a lot of, well, conquering. If there are future books (and I certainly hope there are!) we may get a bit of that. For now, Al is still struggling to get on top.
If nothing else, I have to enjoy this book for introducing me to a whole new array of Greek obscenities. Since Liddell-Scott and other dictionaries are products of the rather puritanical 19th century and have only limited English-Greek functionality it’s rather hard to locate such expressions.
Anyone who enjoyed the first book will likely love this one, which feels more like a completed story than that did. To recap, the last one’s arc was entirely character-driven and took us from Alexander and Hephaestion’s meeting to their eventual romance. There’s more going on, but that is the spine. This time the book’s main storyline is the conflict between him and Philip during the leadup to Philip’s invasion of Persia. Anyone who knows anything about the two can guess where the book ends.
With the book moving beyond Alexander’s childhood into the much broader range of adulthood, it’s interesting to see what does and does not get focused on. There aren’t really any surprises actually. The book is still focusing on character and setting. Alexander’s personality gets a little more drawn out and he’s starting to seem a bit more like I imagine him. The pride, the stubbornness, the unending, unquenchable, relentless lust for glory. It’s all here.
His relationship with Hephaestion is still a highpoint, with the two opposites providing exactly what the other needs. It’s got to be hard being a prince and dealing with all the endless sycophants struggling to get near you. But Hephaestion loves the man, he finds the prince rather a nuisance. You can see why emotionally needy Alexander would go crazy for that. The other key relationship is between Alexander and his father. This one really breaks my heart. The two are absolutely poison to each other. One is too proud to admit his emotions, the other incapable of not doing so. And both are too stubborn to back down.
Another element that is handled very well is the loving depiction of everyday Macedonian life and society. Religion continues to be strongly presented as does the love of literature and other cultural allusions. Sexuality really kicks into overdrive. Now that Alex and Phaestas are a couple they’re screwing like rabbits. It actually gets uncomfortably explicit sometimes. What’s more interesting (at least to me; other views may vary) are the mores that come with the act. Some of which are quite bizarre. Phaestas and Al are a lot like a modern gay couple compared to the strict pederasty of the time. It’s sweet, but emotionally devastating for them to come to terms with.
What continue to get very little attention are some of the elements you might expect to see more of in Alexander’s adulthood. Elements like warfare. We do get some of course, since it would be impossible to avoid. We even get a whole chapter on Chaeroneia. But the buildup to the battle (both political and military) is hardly setting the scene for the importance of the match. And the battle itself seems detached and emotionally distant. We mainly follow Hephaestion as he stumbles around trying to hold off a single warrior. The aftermath is rather more memorable than the event. Politics is also a little sidelined, although again we do get some. Most of what we see are of the family politics variety, where the interaction between marriages and the highland/lowland clans are well handled. But of foreign affairs or the alliances between Macedon and the Greek states we’re left pretty vague.
The book’s interests are not too far from my own when reading historical fiction (people who write great battle scenes or good political maneuvering often struggle to write anything else) so this is mainly there to give fair warning to people expecting this account of one of history’s greatest conquerors to include a lot of, well, conquering. If there are future books (and I certainly hope there are!) we may get a bit of that. For now, Al is still struggling to get on top.
If nothing else, I have to enjoy this book for introducing me to a whole new array of Greek obscenities. Since Liddell-Scott and other dictionaries are products of the rather puritanical 19th century and have only limited English-Greek functionality it’s rather hard to locate such expressions.
February 7, 2020
In college I took a Roman history course. It was a very detailed and in-depth study of Roman society and I LOVED it mostly because the professor sold it. They were into it and brought that energy to the classroom and it was infectious. I was actually excited to go to class, a rarity indeed during undergrad.
In my opinion, this book needs the author to tell it in person. It needs life and vitality and more fiction in this historical fiction. Alexander and Hephaistion are historical figures and while it's clear the author knows them inside and out I don't feel like I know them. Maybe it's due to an over reliance on the presumption that they are famous historical figures and therefore known but I would've liked to know Reames' version of them. Perhaps that's anathema or verboten but there it is.
What's clear is Alexander and Hephaistion care for, trust and love each other but they never achieved fully realized status in my mind, mostly owing to an abundance of head hopping. There were so many different POVs that not only pulled me out of the story time and time again but more importantly stymied my connection to them. Their chemistry as lovers never gelled. Best friends and confidantes, yes. Soulmates, erm?
Another hurdle was the ridiculous number of names dropped throughout this novel that came across as pedantic filler. It didn't advance the story and became tiresome. Case in point:
If there were a test I would fail, BECAUSE I. DON'T. CARE.
In this same vein, too much time was spent stringing historical events together and incorporating a multitude of secondary characters all of which served to drain this story of its lifeblood. Capitalizing on Alexander and Hephaistion's inchoate connection would've given this story a soul but sadly that connection was only briefly touched on in erratic fits and starts. Even Alexander's relationship with his father Philip skirted something that could've been brilliant. Flawed characters offer a wealth of opportunities but unfortunately none of these onions were peeled.
Yet, something compelled me to finish it and that counts for something. Reames clearly has the intellectual chops and passion for this genre as well as an affinity language; translating all that passion into an engaging tale with characters that captivate and enchant me is where this novel fell short.
However, my opinions are my own and YMMV.
A copy was provided by NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
In my opinion, this book needs the author to tell it in person. It needs life and vitality and more fiction in this historical fiction. Alexander and Hephaistion are historical figures and while it's clear the author knows them inside and out I don't feel like I know them. Maybe it's due to an over reliance on the presumption that they are famous historical figures and therefore known but I would've liked to know Reames' version of them. Perhaps that's anathema or verboten but there it is.
What's clear is Alexander and Hephaistion care for, trust and love each other but they never achieved fully realized status in my mind, mostly owing to an abundance of head hopping. There were so many different POVs that not only pulled me out of the story time and time again but more importantly stymied my connection to them. Their chemistry as lovers never gelled. Best friends and confidantes, yes. Soulmates, erm?
Another hurdle was the ridiculous number of names dropped throughout this novel that came across as pedantic filler. It didn't advance the story and became tiresome. Case in point:
Those who'd awaited Alexandros hailed largely from the south or midlands: Ptolemaios and Marsyas or Eordaia, Harpalos and Derdas of Elimeia, and Attalos Andromenous from Tymphaia. Hephaistion, Nearkhos, and Erigyios didn't count. Yet both Krateros and Perdikkas of Orestis soon joined them, as well as Leonnatos of Lynkestis, Lysimakhos of Thessaly, and Hector, Parmenion's son.
If there were a test I would fail, BECAUSE I. DON'T. CARE.
In this same vein, too much time was spent stringing historical events together and incorporating a multitude of secondary characters all of which served to drain this story of its lifeblood. Capitalizing on Alexander and Hephaistion's inchoate connection would've given this story a soul but sadly that connection was only briefly touched on in erratic fits and starts. Even Alexander's relationship with his father Philip skirted something that could've been brilliant. Flawed characters offer a wealth of opportunities but unfortunately none of these onions were peeled.
Yet, something compelled me to finish it and that counts for something. Reames clearly has the intellectual chops and passion for this genre as well as an affinity language; translating all that passion into an engaging tale with characters that captivate and enchant me is where this novel fell short.
However, my opinions are my own and YMMV.
A copy was provided by NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
April 27, 2021
The second half of Reames’s novel about Alexander’s youth knocks it out of the park for me. Dancing with the Lion (both halves) emerges as an excellent retelling of Alexander’s youth, easily on a par with (if different from) Renault’s Fire from Heaven, and exceeding Annabel Lyon’s The Golden Mean, never mind Valerio Manfredi’s Child of a Dream.
She captures human complexity, and in her hands, everyone seems multifaceted. Her characters do not behave in trite ways, and her dialogue is rarely pedestrian. Her Alexandros felt genuine in a way hard to generate for a semi-mythic historical figure, and her Hephaistion is simply the best version I’ve yet encountered (although Jo Graham’s Stealing Fire is a close second). Even secondary characters emerge as layered and distinct.
For me, the stand-out secondary character was Amyntor, Hephaistion’s father, as a contrast to Philip. But characters usually given short shift in Alexander novels (Philip and Olympias) are treated fairly. They’re far from perfect, but Philip is not an incompetent drunk and Olympias is not a crazy bitch (thank God). In fact, I rather liked her Philippos, and one can see how he and Alexandros would strike sparks without turning him into a monster.
Similarly, I was struck by her portrayal of Pausanias, Philip’s assassin. On the one hand, it’s clear he’s a jerk. But it’s made equally clear that being a jerk doesn’t excuse what happened to him. Is justice due for all, or only those “deserving”?
I will say that readers who prefer a more “heroic” Alexander, ala Mary Renault, or who want more romance between Alexander and Hephaistion may be disappointed. The books were marketed as romance by the publisher, but really aren’t (which is fine with me, but YMMV).
Several religious ceremonies/events continue a flirtation with fantastical elements. It’s not historical fantasy like Graham’s but walks the edge of magical realism. Readers are left to wonder what, exactly, Alexandros is seeing. Or if he’s a little batty.
One thing I appreciated more in Rise than Becoming were more scenes in the women’s quarters. Kleopatra is a wonderful character, and the women have their own plot thread. Don’t want to say too much, but Kleopatra shows she’s her mother’s (clever) daughter. I did get a laugh out of the elder sister, Kynane, showing up in armor with a sword to move the new wife's loom. That's some serious overkill!
Her treatment of Alexander and Hephaistion’s sexual relationship is frank, but she avoids modernizing it. As a result, we get a fairly nuanced look at why it would have been considered a little transgressive…but not for any of the reasons it would be today. It’s all about status and who’s active and who’s passive, which is bound up with some pretty serious Greek misogyny and fear of (male) penetration. In a scene near the end, Hephaistion manages a magnificent reversal on how he thinks about it, which takes Alexandros by surprise and cements my affection for Hephaistion's character.
In fact, while Alexander would seem the obvious protagonist, sympathetic and likeable if occasionally annoying, Hephaistion emerges as the novels’ true hero. Outwardly, he appears cynical, prickly, sarcastic, and judgmental, but in truth, he’s kind, honest, fundamentally strong, and emotionally stable. He’s exactly what Alexander needs.
(SPOILERS)
Two deaths are gut-wrenching; you WILL need tissues. The battlefield casualty of Hephaistion’s horse was bad enough. But the death of Amyntor? Hephaistion lost his brothers, his beloved horse, then his father. He just keeps getting hit emotionally, and that he’s still standing by the end of the novel is a testament to his strength. That Alexandros withheld the truth about Amyntor's condition when they went into exile made sense for his fears in the moment, but it was a jack@ss choice. And it’s not excused, which I appreciated
She captures human complexity, and in her hands, everyone seems multifaceted. Her characters do not behave in trite ways, and her dialogue is rarely pedestrian. Her Alexandros felt genuine in a way hard to generate for a semi-mythic historical figure, and her Hephaistion is simply the best version I’ve yet encountered (although Jo Graham’s Stealing Fire is a close second). Even secondary characters emerge as layered and distinct.
For me, the stand-out secondary character was Amyntor, Hephaistion’s father, as a contrast to Philip. But characters usually given short shift in Alexander novels (Philip and Olympias) are treated fairly. They’re far from perfect, but Philip is not an incompetent drunk and Olympias is not a crazy bitch (thank God). In fact, I rather liked her Philippos, and one can see how he and Alexandros would strike sparks without turning him into a monster.
Similarly, I was struck by her portrayal of Pausanias, Philip’s assassin. On the one hand, it’s clear he’s a jerk. But it’s made equally clear that being a jerk doesn’t excuse what happened to him. Is justice due for all, or only those “deserving”?
I will say that readers who prefer a more “heroic” Alexander, ala Mary Renault, or who want more romance between Alexander and Hephaistion may be disappointed. The books were marketed as romance by the publisher, but really aren’t (which is fine with me, but YMMV).
Several religious ceremonies/events continue a flirtation with fantastical elements. It’s not historical fantasy like Graham’s but walks the edge of magical realism. Readers are left to wonder what, exactly, Alexandros is seeing. Or if he’s a little batty.
One thing I appreciated more in Rise than Becoming were more scenes in the women’s quarters. Kleopatra is a wonderful character, and the women have their own plot thread. Don’t want to say too much, but Kleopatra shows she’s her mother’s (clever) daughter. I did get a laugh out of the elder sister, Kynane, showing up in armor with a sword to move the new wife's loom. That's some serious overkill!
Her treatment of Alexander and Hephaistion’s sexual relationship is frank, but she avoids modernizing it. As a result, we get a fairly nuanced look at why it would have been considered a little transgressive…but not for any of the reasons it would be today. It’s all about status and who’s active and who’s passive, which is bound up with some pretty serious Greek misogyny and fear of (male) penetration. In a scene near the end, Hephaistion manages a magnificent reversal on how he thinks about it, which takes Alexandros by surprise and cements my affection for Hephaistion's character.
In fact, while Alexander would seem the obvious protagonist, sympathetic and likeable if occasionally annoying, Hephaistion emerges as the novels’ true hero. Outwardly, he appears cynical, prickly, sarcastic, and judgmental, but in truth, he’s kind, honest, fundamentally strong, and emotionally stable. He’s exactly what Alexander needs.
(SPOILERS)
Two deaths are gut-wrenching; you WILL need tissues. The battlefield casualty of Hephaistion’s horse was bad enough. But the death of Amyntor? Hephaistion lost his brothers, his beloved horse, then his father. He just keeps getting hit emotionally, and that he’s still standing by the end of the novel is a testament to his strength. That Alexandros withheld the truth about Amyntor's condition when they went into exile made sense for his fears in the moment, but it was a jack@ss choice. And it’s not excused, which I appreciated
June 16, 2025
Ho appena terminato il secondo volume della dilogia "Dancing with the lion" e mi sento assolutamente soddisfatta. Qui ci sono le cinque stelle piene (e quindi il primo volume si tiene le sue quattro stelle), per diversi motivi.
Prima di tutto la trama. Qui la presenza della storia è ancora più marcata rispetto al primo libro. È vero che l'autrice, alla fine dell'opera, spiega come nel primo volume avesse la necessità di focalizzarsi maggiormente sui personaggi, a discapito delle trame politiche, che sì, ci sono, ma sono nettamente minori rispetto a questo secondo volume. Qui abbiamo campagne militari, intrighi familiari e/o politici... Praticamente avevo gli occhi a cuore per tutto il libro 😍
Ciò non significa che il rapporto tra Alexandros e Hephaistion non sia presente, anzi! Pur non trovandoceli davanti in tutte le pagine, si è sicuri del loro legame e di quanto sia forte esattamente come si è sicuri del sole in cielo. Paradossalmente proprio nell'assenza si sente ancora di più la loro presenza. Menzione speciale alla fine del capitolo dieci, che fa un male cane 🥺
Ringrazio infinitamente l'autrice per tutte le spiegazioni alla fine della sua opera, dove, tra le altre cose, spiega anche le motivazioni di alcune sue scelte, come quella di basare la morte di Philippos non su un intrigo della moglie Myrtalē per far salire al trono Alexandros, ma su tutt'altro. Ci sta, dato che ci sono le basi storiche per poter agire in questo modo, ma soprattutto ciò che accade sul finale (che poi giustificherà l'omicidio di Philippos) porta a uno splendido, ultimo scambio di opinioni tra padre e figlio, che riecheggerà nelle ultime parole pronunciate da Alexandros alla fine del libro.
«Scelgo l'eccellenza».
(e non aggiungo altro per non fare spoiler, ma se vi ho uncuriositə almeno un pò andate a recuperare quest'opera!).
In questo secondo libro mi ha fatto ancora più male proprio il rapporto tra Philippos e Alexandros, il loro volersi bene ma non riuscire in nessun modo a esprimere questi sentimenti a parole. Lo vediamo già nel primo libro, ma qui è molto più accentuato e ammetto che, pur non sapendo fino a che punto sia vero o romanzato, mi ha fatto venire parecchio magone 😔
Infine, di nuovo loro, Alexandros e Hephaistion, con la loro umanità, coi loro difetti, coi loro litigi, con la loro capacità di rimanere sempre l'uno accanto all'altro nonostante tutto... Li ho adorati dall'inizio alla fine 💖
La mia unica speranza è che l'autrice, prima o poi, scriva il famigerato terzo volume (sì, questa è una dilogia che sa di trilogia mancata) per darci "il resto della storia", per farci leggere la sua versione della parte più conosciuta della storia di Alexandros, e con lui di Hephaistion. Incrocio le dita perché le riesca 🤞
Prima di tutto la trama. Qui la presenza della storia è ancora più marcata rispetto al primo libro. È vero che l'autrice, alla fine dell'opera, spiega come nel primo volume avesse la necessità di focalizzarsi maggiormente sui personaggi, a discapito delle trame politiche, che sì, ci sono, ma sono nettamente minori rispetto a questo secondo volume. Qui abbiamo campagne militari, intrighi familiari e/o politici... Praticamente avevo gli occhi a cuore per tutto il libro 😍
Ciò non significa che il rapporto tra Alexandros e Hephaistion non sia presente, anzi! Pur non trovandoceli davanti in tutte le pagine, si è sicuri del loro legame e di quanto sia forte esattamente come si è sicuri del sole in cielo. Paradossalmente proprio nell'assenza si sente ancora di più la loro presenza. Menzione speciale alla fine del capitolo dieci, che fa un male cane 🥺
Ringrazio infinitamente l'autrice per tutte le spiegazioni alla fine della sua opera, dove, tra le altre cose, spiega anche le motivazioni di alcune sue scelte, come quella di basare la morte di Philippos non su un intrigo della moglie Myrtalē per far salire al trono Alexandros, ma su tutt'altro. Ci sta, dato che ci sono le basi storiche per poter agire in questo modo, ma soprattutto ciò che accade sul finale (che poi giustificherà l'omicidio di Philippos) porta a uno splendido, ultimo scambio di opinioni tra padre e figlio, che riecheggerà nelle ultime parole pronunciate da Alexandros alla fine del libro.
«Scelgo l'eccellenza».
(e non aggiungo altro per non fare spoiler, ma se vi ho uncuriositə almeno un pò andate a recuperare quest'opera!).
In questo secondo libro mi ha fatto ancora più male proprio il rapporto tra Philippos e Alexandros, il loro volersi bene ma non riuscire in nessun modo a esprimere questi sentimenti a parole. Lo vediamo già nel primo libro, ma qui è molto più accentuato e ammetto che, pur non sapendo fino a che punto sia vero o romanzato, mi ha fatto venire parecchio magone 😔
Infine, di nuovo loro, Alexandros e Hephaistion, con la loro umanità, coi loro difetti, coi loro litigi, con la loro capacità di rimanere sempre l'uno accanto all'altro nonostante tutto... Li ho adorati dall'inizio alla fine 💖
La mia unica speranza è che l'autrice, prima o poi, scriva il famigerato terzo volume (sì, questa è una dilogia che sa di trilogia mancata) per darci "il resto della storia", per farci leggere la sua versione della parte più conosciuta della storia di Alexandros, e con lui di Hephaistion. Incrocio le dita perché le riesca 🤞
January 28, 2020
Once upon a time, I used to not be able to read any fiction on Alexander the Great because of how off the characterization would seem to me. Now, I feel like I'm too spoiled; how can anything top the delight that was the Dancing with the Lion duology? This second part was a thrilling read, fast-paced and steeped in Macedonian political intrigue. In story that's been being told for millenia now, it's amazing how the author came up with such exciting twists and spins while staying close to the truth of the era. For me, two things stood out in particular. First, it's very clear to me that the author is truly familiar with greek culture and the actual places she's describing, not just as abstract ideas or concepts (which is a big pet peeve of mine when it comes to stories set in Ancient Greece). Second, she knows her characters very well and makes you invested in them. Alekos and Hephaistion in this novel stay completely true to how they were described in the first installment of the series and that's great, because it's an interpretation of their characters I'm all for. This book even got me invested in the relationship between Philippos and Alekos in a way I never thought I would. It's a definite must read for anyone interested in the time period or good historical fiction in general and I'D LOVE to see a continuation dealing with Alex's persian campaing. Until then, I'm going to use all the excitement this book caused me to overcome my procrastinating habbits and actually finish that seminar essay on Alexander the Great I have to write myself.
September 2, 2019
my review will be posted on my blog Sep 21, 2019
-=-=-=-
This was a great continuation of the Dancing With the Lion series. This book brings the author back to the world of Alexandros as he is coming into his own as a leader, a man, and a partner. It’s so difficult to read a book like this and then come up with a succinct summary. Reames is a great writer, using detail when it’s appropriate and simply letting her main characters speak through their actions.
This book is just as much about family and friendship as it is about the general military history of Alexander the Great. There are a lot of differences between Alexandros and his best friend and sometime lover Hephaistion. The most pointed difference in my mind is the way they were raised. Hephaistion’s father was loving, familiar, stern when he had to be… and offered his son advice when he thought it warranted. As the son of a king, Alexandros had a distant relationship with his father. The King has politics and ruling forefront in his mind and his familial bond with Alexandros is fragile. Like Reames, I have no doubt that Philippos loved his son, he just seemed incapable of parenting a son rather than raising an heir. I’m simplifying this greatly in light of the wonderful way that Reames has written the complicated bonds between fathers and sons in this book.
What is clear in the book is that the relationships Alexandros has with all the people in his life are what shapes him into the leader he will become. While his father challenges him at every turn, Alexandros receives more gentle parenting from Hephaistion’s father, Amyntor. And again, Hephaistion… he is Alexandros’ best friend, his brother-in-arms, his lover and in many ways his teacher. The bond between these two characters is beautiful and complex. There are moments that are poignant without being over-the-top…. and I loved that. The bonding ceremony between Alexandros and Hephaistion is beautiful and symbolic of much of the depth of their relationship.
As these two young men mature and grow, their relationship morphs. They are lovers on occasion, friends always and unfailingly dedicated to one another. Hephaistion teaches Alexandros about weakness and true strength, the bonds of love and ultimately, the way to lead.
This series was a fantastic read. Yes, it’s historical, but Reames brings Alexander the Great back to life. I thoroughly enjoyed both of these books, 4 stars from me!
-=-=-=-
This was a great continuation of the Dancing With the Lion series. This book brings the author back to the world of Alexandros as he is coming into his own as a leader, a man, and a partner. It’s so difficult to read a book like this and then come up with a succinct summary. Reames is a great writer, using detail when it’s appropriate and simply letting her main characters speak through their actions.
This book is just as much about family and friendship as it is about the general military history of Alexander the Great. There are a lot of differences between Alexandros and his best friend and sometime lover Hephaistion. The most pointed difference in my mind is the way they were raised. Hephaistion’s father was loving, familiar, stern when he had to be… and offered his son advice when he thought it warranted. As the son of a king, Alexandros had a distant relationship with his father. The King has politics and ruling forefront in his mind and his familial bond with Alexandros is fragile. Like Reames, I have no doubt that Philippos loved his son, he just seemed incapable of parenting a son rather than raising an heir. I’m simplifying this greatly in light of the wonderful way that Reames has written the complicated bonds between fathers and sons in this book.
What is clear in the book is that the relationships Alexandros has with all the people in his life are what shapes him into the leader he will become. While his father challenges him at every turn, Alexandros receives more gentle parenting from Hephaistion’s father, Amyntor. And again, Hephaistion… he is Alexandros’ best friend, his brother-in-arms, his lover and in many ways his teacher. The bond between these two characters is beautiful and complex. There are moments that are poignant without being over-the-top…. and I loved that. The bonding ceremony between Alexandros and Hephaistion is beautiful and symbolic of much of the depth of their relationship.
As these two young men mature and grow, their relationship morphs. They are lovers on occasion, friends always and unfailingly dedicated to one another. Hephaistion teaches Alexandros about weakness and true strength, the bonds of love and ultimately, the way to lead.
This series was a fantastic read. Yes, it’s historical, but Reames brings Alexander the Great back to life. I thoroughly enjoyed both of these books, 4 stars from me!
Read
February 21, 2021EXTRA & CUT SCENES!
For those who enjoyed the novels (book 1 Becoming and book 2 Rise), and would like more from the boys, I have several cut scenes on my website, as well as 3 others that occur between the books.
These 3 include "Moth & Flame," a bit of romantic floof, "Two Scorpions," Olympias takes on Hephaistion in a one-on-one confrontation, and finally, the novelette "For the Love of Geometry," which shows the boys from the point of view of the adults, plus a bet between King Philippos and Aristoteles.
Just click on the link above to go straight to that page on my website. They're available in both PDF and HTML formats, depending on which you prefer to read, and what device you're reading them on. While on the site, take time to explore a little. There are a number of extras, including hearing their names, a brief glossary, and even video blogs of the Macedonian countryside showing places mentioned in the books.
Hope you enjoy these titbits!
October 22, 2019
As much as I enjoyed the first book in the series("Becoming") I really LOVED the second book of "Dancing with the lion: Rise". It continues the story of Alexandros of Macedon, from the time of being regent at the age of 16 to his ascension to the throne four years later. It includes quite a few well known historical events, but with the author's own clever interpretations which explain some of the puzzles historians have been trying to solve for centuries. Reames's academic background comes through the finest at those moments. Comparing to "Becoming", "Rise" is more plot driven and faster paced. There isn't a dull moment.
Nonetheless all the twists and turns are not at the expense of character development and emotional depth. Alexandros and Hephaistion both come alive vividly, through joy and pain and devotion, each with his own set of virtues and faults. Their relationship is complex due to their different social standings, upbringing and personalities. One cannot help but feel deeply invested in their lives and quests for excellence(in the Aristotelian sense). As the book progresses, the intensity of events and emotions rises steadily until the final crescendo, which definitely leaves readers to crave for more.
As in the first book, the supporting cast gets much love. But the father/son dynamics have generated much emotional turmoil, with stark contrast between Philippos and Amyntor, each loving his son in his own way. There are a few new characters as well. The women get stronger voices - from royals to slaves. None is perfect, all with dignity.
Reames is an excellent writer, not just an excellent writer for a historian. The plots are well constructed, the characters well developed, the historical details authentic. While the first book may feel unfinished, the second one stands well on its own even if one skips the first. But there are some amazing parallels between the two that might take a couple reads to get. Like olives - the Greek favorite - the longer you savor, the more you'll enjoy.
Nonetheless all the twists and turns are not at the expense of character development and emotional depth. Alexandros and Hephaistion both come alive vividly, through joy and pain and devotion, each with his own set of virtues and faults. Their relationship is complex due to their different social standings, upbringing and personalities. One cannot help but feel deeply invested in their lives and quests for excellence(in the Aristotelian sense). As the book progresses, the intensity of events and emotions rises steadily until the final crescendo, which definitely leaves readers to crave for more.
As in the first book, the supporting cast gets much love. But the father/son dynamics have generated much emotional turmoil, with stark contrast between Philippos and Amyntor, each loving his son in his own way. There are a few new characters as well. The women get stronger voices - from royals to slaves. None is perfect, all with dignity.
Reames is an excellent writer, not just an excellent writer for a historian. The plots are well constructed, the characters well developed, the historical details authentic. While the first book may feel unfinished, the second one stands well on its own even if one skips the first. But there are some amazing parallels between the two that might take a couple reads to get. Like olives - the Greek favorite - the longer you savor, the more you'll enjoy.
October 28, 2019
If I'm going to dub this the definitive Alexander fictionalization, (which I am) I'm subheading the second part of the series "The Definitive Hephaistion fictionalization".
Holy wow.
I mean, this and part one are CLEARLY one novel, as this book just hits you with emotional payoff after emotional payoff for the things set up in part one. And I'm freaking impressed at the fact that its turned out to be an anti-war novel about a guy who is best known for being EXCEPTIONALLY GOOD AT WAR that DOESN'T demonize any character. That's a feat of subtlety right there!!
I'm actually most excited about seeing a visibly demisexual character in this iteration of Hephaistion. You don't get to see demi representation very often.....and never outside of VERY LGBT+ pander-y situations. But having him up and say he can't experience attraction without connection with those historically and culturally significant words meant a lot to me and I'm sure to a lot of people of similar experience.
I have only one critique:
HOW DARE YOU DO THAT TO BREPHAS I AM STILL CRYING AND LIKELY WILL BE FOR THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE.
(It was perfect. I'm in PAIN.)
Holy wow.
I mean, this and part one are CLEARLY one novel, as this book just hits you with emotional payoff after emotional payoff for the things set up in part one. And I'm freaking impressed at the fact that its turned out to be an anti-war novel about a guy who is best known for being EXCEPTIONALLY GOOD AT WAR that DOESN'T demonize any character. That's a feat of subtlety right there!!
I'm actually most excited about seeing a visibly demisexual character in this iteration of Hephaistion. You don't get to see demi representation very often.....and never outside of VERY LGBT+ pander-y situations. But having him up and say he can't experience attraction without connection with those historically and culturally significant words meant a lot to me and I'm sure to a lot of people of similar experience.
I have only one critique:
HOW DARE YOU DO THAT TO BREPHAS I AM STILL CRYING AND LIKELY WILL BE FOR THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE.
(It was perfect. I'm in PAIN.)
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
October 21, 2019
A Joyfully Jay review.
4.25 stars
Rise is the second in the Dancing with the Lion series and, at least for now, the last. The author mentions she plans on writing more about Alexandros and Hephaistion in the future, but there’s no book currently on the horizon. And that makes Rise slightly problematic. It is a very much an “in-between” novel. Alot of things happened in the first book, Becoming, and Rise ends with a pivotal event in the life of Alexander the Great. Which leaves the bulk of Rise dealing with the in between. There are things happening to be sure ,but it almost reads as filler, taking up the space between Becoming and whatever happens after Rise. And if there were another book in the series, I think it would be fine. It would make sense and have a purpose. But as the “end” of a series, it comes up short. The pacing is more scattered and events occur during leaps of time; weeks and months will pass between chapters. So it’s harder to measure continuity in Rise and, because of that, when the end comes it feels abrupt and jarring.
The historical aspect is still stellar. The author does an amazing job of building a credible and realistic world around Alexandros and his compatriots.
Read Sue’s review in its entirety here.
4.25 stars
Rise is the second in the Dancing with the Lion series and, at least for now, the last. The author mentions she plans on writing more about Alexandros and Hephaistion in the future, but there’s no book currently on the horizon. And that makes Rise slightly problematic. It is a very much an “in-between” novel. Alot of things happened in the first book, Becoming, and Rise ends with a pivotal event in the life of Alexander the Great. Which leaves the bulk of Rise dealing with the in between. There are things happening to be sure ,but it almost reads as filler, taking up the space between Becoming and whatever happens after Rise. And if there were another book in the series, I think it would be fine. It would make sense and have a purpose. But as the “end” of a series, it comes up short. The pacing is more scattered and events occur during leaps of time; weeks and months will pass between chapters. So it’s harder to measure continuity in Rise and, because of that, when the end comes it feels abrupt and jarring.
The historical aspect is still stellar. The author does an amazing job of building a credible and realistic world around Alexandros and his compatriots.
Read Sue’s review in its entirety here.
November 13, 2019
A beautifully written sequel to 'Becoming', the story of Alexander's boyhood. The novel bursts with information about Macedonia and Ancient Greece and, despite the author's admitted inventions and historical acrobatics, gives a believable picture of Alexander's life and loves, friends and enemies, during the period of his adolescence, immediately prior to the start of his Asian adventure. His father, Phillippos II, is finely drawn, and shows a man, a king, a ruler, an unstable drunkard and a hero, with a love/hate relationship with his son. Alexander's boyhood friend and lover, Hephaistion, is exquisitely rendered as a sensitive, thoughtful and mature man who falls deeply in love with his xtraordinary prince and companion. Alexander is the complex young man, who by rank, nature and personality, will become Alexander the Great. A lovely book, which must be followed by Alexander's conquest of Asia.
January 9, 2020
Excellent in every respect!
Alexander and Hephaistion travel the rocky road of love, growing closer yet frightened by their need for the other, learning to trust yet accept their differences, discovering ways to guard bodies and hearts during problems with their fathers.
Hephaistion thought, "Men fought wars and played politics; women suffered the results of both." The women in this story handle the drama men cause, including new wives, arranged marriages, and exile. Please tell me there's a Book Three!
Be sure to check out the author's extras, including videos of the setting: https://jeannereames.net/Dancing_with...
Alexander and Hephaistion travel the rocky road of love, growing closer yet frightened by their need for the other, learning to trust yet accept their differences, discovering ways to guard bodies and hearts during problems with their fathers.
Hephaistion thought, "Men fought wars and played politics; women suffered the results of both." The women in this story handle the drama men cause, including new wives, arranged marriages, and exile. Please tell me there's a Book Three!
Be sure to check out the author's extras, including videos of the setting: https://jeannereames.net/Dancing_with...
April 20, 2025
Alejandro no era ni un demonio ni un dios, lo que sea que haya querido creer sobre sí mismo. Era un hombre, capaz de crueldad y simpatía, brillantez y ofuscación, paranoia y una generosidad abierta.
Tan notable como era, era humano.
Y eso es lo que lo vuelve interesante. ❤️
Si algún día la autora decide continuar con las aventuras de Alejandro y Hefestión por Asia, estoy más que dispuesta a leerla.
Título: Dancing With The Lion: Rise
Autora: Jeanne Reames
Libro 2 de la duología Dancing with the Lion
Idioma: Inglés
Etiquetas: Ficción histórica, Romance M/M, Ficción
Disponible en: Amazon Kindle
⭐ Valoración: 4.5/5
En esta segunda entrega de la duología Dancing with the Lion, acompañamos a Alejandro en su nueva etapa como regente de Macedonia. Las tensiones con su padre, la amenaza constante de ser reemplazado por un nuevo heredero, y los hostigamientos de su madre para mantenerlo a salvo en el trono marcan el inicio de una trama mucho más política e intensa. A esto se suma el desprecio de su padre por el apodo “pequeño Rey”, lo que desencadena un conflicto cada vez más peligroso. En medio de esta inestabilidad, Alejandro se pregunta si su amistad con Hefestión podrá sobrevivir a las intrigas palaciegas y las estrategias de su madre.
💬 “Esto, pensó, no era brutalidad animal. Los animales no hacían esto. Esta era la maldad humana.”
Una de las cosas que más me sorprendió y disfruté de esta novela fue la oportunidad de ver a Alejandro más allá de su juventud como pupilo de Aristóteles. Son pocos los libros de ficción que abordan esta etapa de su vida con tanto detalle y realismo, y fue una grata sorpresa sumergirme en esta versión tan compleja y humana del personaje.
La tensión política y la creciente brecha entre Alejandro y su padre están magistralmente desarrolladas. Jeanne Reames tiene un estilo que logra equilibrar muy bien la rigurosidad histórica con la emoción narrativa, y eso hace que cada escena tenga un peso particular.
Me gustó especialmente cómo se retrata a Olimpia, la madre de Alejandro. Lejos de caer en el estereotipo de la madre ambiciosa y manipuladora, la autora la presenta con muchos matices: inteligente, estratégica, pero también con conocimientos en medicina y una fuerte influencia en la corte. Además, se agradece la inclusión de personajes femeninos poco explorados, como las hermanas de Alejandro y las demás esposas del rey.
💬 “No podría dejar de amarte más de lo que puedo volar. Me siento muy caliente. Todo fuego. Intento contraerlo, y luego vuelves a prenderlo y el fuego me quema.”
En lo personal, no tengo problema cuando el romance es un elemento secundario en la trama, especialmente en historias centradas en figuras históricas como Alejandro Magno. Aun así, la relación con Hefestión se siente íntima y poderosa, sin restarle peso a la política ni a las batallas. Es un equilibrio precioso entre la vulnerabilidad emocional y la estrategia militar, que construye un Alejandro profundamente humano y admirable.
Sin duda, esta novela se posiciona entre mis favoritas del año. Si les interesa la figura de Alejandro Magno, el contexto histórico o las historias de amor sutiles pero intensas, les recomiendo muchísimo no solo el libro, sino también visitar el sitio web de la autora. Allí encontrarán contenido adicional, investigaciones y material que complementa y enriquece la lectura.
Tan notable como era, era humano.
Y eso es lo que lo vuelve interesante. ❤️
Si algún día la autora decide continuar con las aventuras de Alejandro y Hefestión por Asia, estoy más que dispuesta a leerla.
Título: Dancing With The Lion: Rise
Autora: Jeanne Reames
Libro 2 de la duología Dancing with the Lion
Idioma: Inglés
Etiquetas: Ficción histórica, Romance M/M, Ficción
Disponible en: Amazon Kindle
⭐ Valoración: 4.5/5
En esta segunda entrega de la duología Dancing with the Lion, acompañamos a Alejandro en su nueva etapa como regente de Macedonia. Las tensiones con su padre, la amenaza constante de ser reemplazado por un nuevo heredero, y los hostigamientos de su madre para mantenerlo a salvo en el trono marcan el inicio de una trama mucho más política e intensa. A esto se suma el desprecio de su padre por el apodo “pequeño Rey”, lo que desencadena un conflicto cada vez más peligroso. En medio de esta inestabilidad, Alejandro se pregunta si su amistad con Hefestión podrá sobrevivir a las intrigas palaciegas y las estrategias de su madre.
💬 “Esto, pensó, no era brutalidad animal. Los animales no hacían esto. Esta era la maldad humana.”
Una de las cosas que más me sorprendió y disfruté de esta novela fue la oportunidad de ver a Alejandro más allá de su juventud como pupilo de Aristóteles. Son pocos los libros de ficción que abordan esta etapa de su vida con tanto detalle y realismo, y fue una grata sorpresa sumergirme en esta versión tan compleja y humana del personaje.
La tensión política y la creciente brecha entre Alejandro y su padre están magistralmente desarrolladas. Jeanne Reames tiene un estilo que logra equilibrar muy bien la rigurosidad histórica con la emoción narrativa, y eso hace que cada escena tenga un peso particular.
Me gustó especialmente cómo se retrata a Olimpia, la madre de Alejandro. Lejos de caer en el estereotipo de la madre ambiciosa y manipuladora, la autora la presenta con muchos matices: inteligente, estratégica, pero también con conocimientos en medicina y una fuerte influencia en la corte. Además, se agradece la inclusión de personajes femeninos poco explorados, como las hermanas de Alejandro y las demás esposas del rey.
💬 “No podría dejar de amarte más de lo que puedo volar. Me siento muy caliente. Todo fuego. Intento contraerlo, y luego vuelves a prenderlo y el fuego me quema.”
En lo personal, no tengo problema cuando el romance es un elemento secundario en la trama, especialmente en historias centradas en figuras históricas como Alejandro Magno. Aun así, la relación con Hefestión se siente íntima y poderosa, sin restarle peso a la política ni a las batallas. Es un equilibrio precioso entre la vulnerabilidad emocional y la estrategia militar, que construye un Alejandro profundamente humano y admirable.
Sin duda, esta novela se posiciona entre mis favoritas del año. Si les interesa la figura de Alejandro Magno, el contexto histórico o las historias de amor sutiles pero intensas, les recomiendo muchísimo no solo el libro, sino también visitar el sitio web de la autora. Allí encontrarán contenido adicional, investigaciones y material que complementa y enriquece la lectura.
March 26, 2020
I wish there were more books in the series, especially during this time of turmoil. I found myself picking up these books as a release from my worries about the pandemic.
We get a lot of insight on various characters in this book. There are some beautiful moments between Hephaistion and Alexandros and some tumultuous moments, the book ends for them tenderly. I would have liked more of those moments. They didn’t have to be romantic, but something to show the reader why they are such iconic soul mates to the point that real historical Alexander the Great went to such extremes upon Hephaistion’s death. I’m thinking along the lines of Wuthering Heights. That book is not romantic, Cathy and Heathcliff are a train wreck but they have an unbreakable bond that carries on past death (“If all else perished, and he remained, I should still continue to be; and if all else remained, and he were annihilated, the universe would turn to a mighty stranger.” Cathy about Heathcliff). If this book gave us a bit more of the bond between Hephaistion and Alexandros, it would have been a full five stars.
Alexander the great is what this series is about but Hephaistion is my favorite. I could read a whole separate series just about Hephaistion. I would have loved to have seen more of his time with his mother and baby brother and his time with Kampaspē. He started out having a jealous hatred for her. I don't want to give spoilers but during his time with her he could have gotten even more bitter and cruel towards her or used her in other ways instead they became friends. This moment really solidified my love for him as a character:
“Thank you,” he said, face grave, “for helping my mother these past months.” She stared. One didn’t thank the slaves. “You’re welcome.” She stood on the bottom landing, looking up after him. The deep-down natures of men were revealed in small things.
Honestly, I’d love a novella just about Kampaspē.
We all know how the real story ends but I still hope there is eventually more to this series especially from Hephaistion's voice.
We get a lot of insight on various characters in this book. There are some beautiful moments between Hephaistion and Alexandros and some tumultuous moments, the book ends for them tenderly. I would have liked more of those moments. They didn’t have to be romantic, but something to show the reader why they are such iconic soul mates to the point that real historical Alexander the Great went to such extremes upon Hephaistion’s death. I’m thinking along the lines of Wuthering Heights. That book is not romantic, Cathy and Heathcliff are a train wreck but they have an unbreakable bond that carries on past death (“If all else perished, and he remained, I should still continue to be; and if all else remained, and he were annihilated, the universe would turn to a mighty stranger.” Cathy about Heathcliff). If this book gave us a bit more of the bond between Hephaistion and Alexandros, it would have been a full five stars.
Alexander the great is what this series is about but Hephaistion is my favorite. I could read a whole separate series just about Hephaistion. I would have loved to have seen more of his time with his mother and baby brother and his time with Kampaspē. He started out having a jealous hatred for her. I don't want to give spoilers but during his time with her he could have gotten even more bitter and cruel towards her or used her in other ways instead they became friends. This moment really solidified my love for him as a character:
“Thank you,” he said, face grave, “for helping my mother these past months.” She stared. One didn’t thank the slaves. “You’re welcome.” She stood on the bottom landing, looking up after him. The deep-down natures of men were revealed in small things.
Honestly, I’d love a novella just about Kampaspē.
We all know how the real story ends but I still hope there is eventually more to this series especially from Hephaistion's voice.
February 25, 2023
It’s taken me while to review, I’ve been busy with my postgrad stuff and honestly Rise was such a welcome escape from it all!
Whilst there are differences stylistically from Becoming, Reames has improved her narrative voice and we learn more about the characters, what motivates them, etc.
Alexandros and Hephaistion go through it in Rise... But like any relationship there are always going to be trials and Alexandros and Hephaistion come out of it stronger, displaying the depth of their bond.
Kampaspē is such a brilliantly interesting character, I wasn’t too sure about her at first but honestly she’s fantastic. Reames writes some hecking wonderful female characters, (Kampaspē included) such as Kleopatra, Myrtalē, Kyanne, etc. We also get the pleasure of meeting Hephaistion’s mother, who doesn’t get as much page time as I’d have liked, I want to know more about her!
I was devastated by Philippos’ death, which I really didn’t expect to be so moved by, but having read the extra and cut scenes it’s so obvious that Philippos cares about his son. Philippos and Alexandros never get the chance to fix their relationship fully which is heartbreaking.
So much happens in this novel that I couldn’t possibly touch on it all but, the scene with the Theban Band’s oath will probably remain an absolute favourite!
The covers of the novels aren’t great, I feel like there’s a risk of someone avoiding it and going for a book with a pretty cover instead... BUT, remember that old saying, because really don’t judge the Dancing with the Lion books by their covers. I do
think it’s unfortunate that Becoming & Rise were written as one book and then cut into two because I suspect as one book it would have been perfect. As a side note, I’d love for both books to be made into audiobooks at some point!
Personally, I love the Dancing with the Lion books, if you don’t like them don’t read them... I hope Reames finds a way to continue with the series as I’d definitely like to read more!
Whilst there are differences stylistically from Becoming, Reames has improved her narrative voice and we learn more about the characters, what motivates them, etc.
Alexandros and Hephaistion go through it in Rise... But like any relationship there are always going to be trials and Alexandros and Hephaistion come out of it stronger, displaying the depth of their bond.
Kampaspē is such a brilliantly interesting character, I wasn’t too sure about her at first but honestly she’s fantastic. Reames writes some hecking wonderful female characters, (Kampaspē included) such as Kleopatra, Myrtalē, Kyanne, etc. We also get the pleasure of meeting Hephaistion’s mother, who doesn’t get as much page time as I’d have liked, I want to know more about her!
I was devastated by Philippos’ death, which I really didn’t expect to be so moved by, but having read the extra and cut scenes it’s so obvious that Philippos cares about his son. Philippos and Alexandros never get the chance to fix their relationship fully which is heartbreaking.
So much happens in this novel that I couldn’t possibly touch on it all but, the scene with the Theban Band’s oath will probably remain an absolute favourite!
The covers of the novels aren’t great, I feel like there’s a risk of someone avoiding it and going for a book with a pretty cover instead... BUT, remember that old saying, because really don’t judge the Dancing with the Lion books by their covers. I do
think it’s unfortunate that Becoming & Rise were written as one book and then cut into two because I suspect as one book it would have been perfect. As a side note, I’d love for both books to be made into audiobooks at some point!
Personally, I love the Dancing with the Lion books, if you don’t like them don’t read them... I hope Reames finds a way to continue with the series as I’d definitely like to read more!
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
April 26, 2024
Ma quindi Alessandro ed Efestione erano amanti?
Avrebbero potuto esserlo. Il confine tra l’amicizia profonda (φιλία), il rapporto platonico e la relazione amorosa era molto labile. La Grecia era una realtà completamente diversa dalla nostra.
La storia continua ad essere appassionante, la scrittura dell’autrice è sempre ben misurata, e, come immaginavo, con la crescita di Alessandro perfino gli eventi descritti diventano più interessanti.
In questo volume vediamo finalmente Alessandro ritagliarsi uno spazio nella scacchiera politica come degno figlio di suo padre, nonostante la minaccia di un nuovo erede di Filippo, figlio dell’ennesima moglie greca del re.
La narrazione è sempre storicamente accurata, e da questa emerge tutta l’attenzione dell’autrice per le fonti. Assistiamo all’ascesa del leoncino di Filippo e alla celeberrima battaglia di Cheronea, battaglia in cui Alessandro si distingue per la prima volta, appena maggiorenne, combattendo fianco a fianco con il padre.
Ho apprezzato la scelta dell’autrice di voler in qualche modo scagionare Myrtale/Olimpiade per il finale, scartando l’ipotesi più accreditata storicamente e ricercandone un’altra in fonti alternative. (Non dico di più)
Di certo, l’esperienza della Reames come docente universitaria e la sua specializzazione in storia Macedonica si sentono tutte!
Spero vivamente che decida di andare avanti con la narrazione. La dilogia finisce qui, ma non la storia di Alessandro, che in effetti entra nel vivo. Sarebbe meraviglioso continuare questa avventura leggendo, dalla penna della Reames, le future campagne persiane e le relazioni di Alessandro con Statira e Roxane.
March 8, 2020
The continuation of the story of Alexander and Hephaistion before Alexander became king. Beautiful telling of their love for each other and its complexities in a world which allowed it, yet still had rules. I found the characterizations to be finely drawn and not continuing stereotypes of who they have been portrayed. The various viewpoints add to the story. I thoroughly love Amyntor. Jeanne Reames has written my favorite Alexander and Hephaistion novels. LOVE THEM BOTH.
December 28, 2020
Very good
June 24, 2022
!!!!!
I need a third volume. I really, really do.
Thank you Jeanne Reames, you truly brought joy to my routine with these two books.
I need a third volume. I really, really do.
Thank you Jeanne Reames, you truly brought joy to my routine with these two books.
July 20, 2024
Voto: 5 presagi confusi ma tu ti fidi del tuo cuore e, in faccia agli dei, parti all'avventura
Io non so bene come troverò le parole o un filo logico per fare questa recensione. Sono confusa, ma di brutto. Ho messo 5 stelle, sì. Ma la storia per me non è assolutamente un 10. Eppure lo è. Lo è perché mi ha rubato un pezzetto di sanità (l'ultimo che mi rimaneva, RIP), perché mi ha mandato in crisi, perché mi ha fatto leggere persino alle 8 di mattina sui mezzi (cosa che non faccio mai!). Leggevo con l'attesa che succedesse ciò che volevo io anche se se sapevo che non sarebbe mai successo. Insomma, alla fine l'ho capito che è uno storico su Alessandro Magno, che il resto è tutto un contorno. Ma quanto avrei voluto che quel contorno fosse qualcosina di più! Comunque... Questa attesa mi ha logorato dentro e non ho capito quando l'attesa è diventata un "oddio, però io voglio davvero leggere e capire e scoprire". Non sono una fan della storia, ma tipo che sono ignorantissima e non so niente di niente, le cose studiate a scuola sono già un ricordo lontano e di Alessandro non ricordo proprio nulla, quindi alla fine è stata anche una storia che comunque non conoscevo. Mi interessava? Non particolarmente, i pezzi di guerra, di strategia politica, nomi su nomi che non capivo (e pure in ellenico, che mi hanno di nuovo confusa), città, robe... Non mi hanno fatto impazzire quei momenti, però sono andata avanti.
Questo secondo libro rispetto al primo ha una vera e propria trama. Il primo era una accozzaglia di scene, qui invece si ha tutto un filo che va dalle conquiste di Filippo, al matrimonio da cui poi scaturisce l'auto esilio di Alessandro, al suo ritorno e poi al suo diventare re. Nel mezzo ovviamente con tante cosine più o meno belle (per il mio cuore e quella sanità di cui parlavamo).
Partiamo da Alessandro. Eh. Allora. L'ho odiato di brutto per gran parte del libro. Non lo capivo proprio, l'adolescenza lo ha rincretinito. È diventato egoista, vede solo ciò che ha davanti e non ciò che ha intorno, dice una cosa e pensa l'opposto, vive nelle congetture dentro la sua testa, tutto gli è dovuto e agisce in questo senso... senza manco accorgersene! Lo fa spontaneamente. Ed è tonto, è immaturo, non capisce i sentimenti, non si sforza di comprendere quelli degli altri (Efestione *coffcoff*), gira tutto attorno alla sua figura. È lui che non deve apparire debole, che deve dimostrare onore qua, onore là... E veniamo alla sua relazione con Efestione. Declama tanto di amarlo, ma non fa assolutamente nulla per lui. No, è solo un continuo litigio e allontanarsi. Non parlano sti due, ok è anche colpa dell'orgoglio di Efestione, ma quello di Alessandro è più grande. Dice alcune cose belle e il momento dopo le rovina. C'è stata la parte del giuramento che sarebbe dovuta essere sensazionale, e beh sì, Alessandro lì dice delle cose stupende, ma mi è sembrato un po' freddo, forse solo perché lo ha preso come momento ultra solenne. Poi arriva la tipa schiava (di cui ovviamente non ricordo il nome...) e boh... Solo rabbia. Ok, non ha senso arrabbiarsi per una cosa del genere, me ne rendo conto, stiamo parlando dell'antica Grecia. Ma perché Alessandro deve entrare nelle sue cosce quando ha quelle di Efestione? Ah sì, perché con Efestione non fa quasi una mazza. Ah sì, perché amore ed eros sono due cose distinte. Ah sì, Efestione non andrebbe mai con nessun altro a parte te, idiota macedone, mentre tu ti senti obbligato a trovare una con cui ti vada bene. Ripeto, mi rendo conto che è stupido, ma è anche stupido dover per forza andare con un'altra per svuotarsi le palle solo perché è simpatica (parole sue) a dispetto delle altre. "Con te è amore, con lei solo sesso" (altre parole sue). Gna faccio.
Ecco, quindi io sono andata avanti 4 giorni a insultarlo di brutto e a lamentarmi di qualsiasi cosa. E poi. La scena. Ormai al 90% del secondo libro. Che mi apre gli occhi. L'attesa è stata ripagata. Ma tanto. Con la verità più dolce, imbarazzata, sentita, genuina di sempre. Alessandro continua a essere tutto ciò che ho detto sopra, ma adesso mi ha dato una spiegazione a tutto. Ma intendo tutto tutto. Ed è super sensato, è super tenero, super da abbracciò potente. Super da sberle potenti anche, mannaggia. Ed è tutta colpa di Aristotele! Quella vecchia capra! No comment, davvero. Comunque, Alessandro finalmente si mostra, mostra i suoi pensieri, quelli veri, mostra le sue debolezze che tanto odia e capisce che non sono debolezze. Si mostra, si apre. Punto. E il mio cuore si riempie d'amore. Ed è lì che penso "oddio, già ero in crisi, ma adesso sono f0ttuta".
È stata la mia seconda scena preferita, soltanto perché c'è un'altra scena che esprime tantissimo senza il bisogno di nemmeno una parola. Ovvero quando dopo la punizione di Alessandro chiuso in camera come i bambini, lui esce in cortile e vede Efestione insieme agli amici e si butta su di lui. E c'è quell'abbraccio che è proprio un abbraccio dell'anima, si sente nelle ossa. E poi rendono ancora più perfetta la scena gli amici che abbracciano a sua volta Efestione. È stato il momento più bello di tutti. Da lacrime.
E a proposito di Efestione, nel primo avevo detto che non usciva tanto. Beh, nel secondo è il mio bimbo protetto. Please, datemene uno da coccolare che è un pargolo dolce del mio cuore. Pungente, severo, orgoglioso, reale, genuino, non si fa condizionare. Leale, forte, deciso, pronto a sorreggere quando necessario, pronto a sminuirsi per l'onore di Alessandro. Pronto a tutto per lui. Sotto un treno Efestione. Cavolo, è fantastico. E poi si scopre che è demisessuale con un discorso che fa ed è ancora più dolcino. Lui ha fatto un gran salto di qualità. Mi colpisce la sua pragmaticità, ma anche la sua capacità di adattamento. È sempre lui alla fine che deve trattenere, reprimere... Ed esplode, ovvio. Lui sarà pure sotto un treno ma i piedi in testa non se li fa mettere. A lui non interessa che Alessandro è il leoncino di Macedonia, a lui interessa Alessandro, il suo amico di infanzia, il suo amato, il suo amante, il suo tutto. Sparatemi al cuore che facciamo prima. Comunque, lui ha anche una crescita personale niente male.
Tematica centrale del libro è di nuovo il rapporto con la famiglia, ma adesso è sviscerato più in profondità. Abbiamo da una parte Filippo che pensa di amare Alessandro, e sicuro lo fa, ma non è capace. Non sa proprio fare il padre, come dice Amyntor. Semplicemente il re sovrasta il padre. E si chiede come mai Alessandro dubiti di lui e non si fida e lo sfida. Beh, caro, fatti due domande. Lo tratti come un povero mentecatto ribelle. E la cosa triste è che Alessandro, in perenne sfida con lui, è anche in perenne ricerca della sua approvazione. Lui ama suo padre, è inevitabile. E ama sua madre, ma in questo secondo libro la vediamo più con gli occhi da adulto che da bambino che la adora e scopriamo che è molto più serpe e acida. Molto rancorosa, molto spaventosa... Lei ha fatto il salto di qualità al contrario, non l'ho sopportata mai.
Fantastica invece Kleopatra (la sorella, no perché qui la gente ha gli stessi nomi e vai in confusione), penso sia il personaggio secondario meglio riuscito insieme ad Amyntor. Ecco, tornando alle famiglie, Amyntor è un padre eccellente, un marito straordinario, lui fa tutto per Efestione. E infatti si ha questa contrapposizione tra le due famiglie che genere una invidia sana però, molto reale. Oddio, sana ma con qualche risentimento, però non ci si può fare nulla.
Cos'altro? Non so, mi sento un po' prosciugata dopo tutto quello che ho scritto. So che ci sono sicuramente delle tematiche di cui avrei voluto scrivere, ma al momento mi sfuggono.
Un libro partito un po' così, che ho odiato per colpa di Alessandro, ma sotto l'odio c'era la curiosità e poi è diventato una droga sottopelle e non so che diamine sia successo. Il libro, per me e per ciò che mi piace/mi è piaciuto, non è da 10, come già detto, però non riesco a dargli meno del massimo. È un amore/odio che mi porterò sicuramente nel cuore nei prossimi mesi, con tanto di ricerca spasmodica di fanfiction (esistono, vero? No, perché io devo riempire quel buco Alestione che mi manca, voglio le fyccine romance senza il dramma del dopo) e pensieri miei notturni (e fu così che le scrissi io le fanfic).
Sicuramente, se l'autrice continuerà davvero la storia come ha detto, leggerò anche il seguito. Anche se mi spaventa molto sapendo che fine fanno (is not very difficult, la fine è sempre la stessa per tutte ste coppie ahahah) e non mi va di soffrire. Ma, donna, fammi soffrire. Ho bisogno di tutto. Di più.
E così, ho perso anche l'ultimo neurone.
Io non so bene come troverò le parole o un filo logico per fare questa recensione. Sono confusa, ma di brutto. Ho messo 5 stelle, sì. Ma la storia per me non è assolutamente un 10. Eppure lo è. Lo è perché mi ha rubato un pezzetto di sanità (l'ultimo che mi rimaneva, RIP), perché mi ha mandato in crisi, perché mi ha fatto leggere persino alle 8 di mattina sui mezzi (cosa che non faccio mai!). Leggevo con l'attesa che succedesse ciò che volevo io anche se se sapevo che non sarebbe mai successo. Insomma, alla fine l'ho capito che è uno storico su Alessandro Magno, che il resto è tutto un contorno. Ma quanto avrei voluto che quel contorno fosse qualcosina di più! Comunque... Questa attesa mi ha logorato dentro e non ho capito quando l'attesa è diventata un "oddio, però io voglio davvero leggere e capire e scoprire". Non sono una fan della storia, ma tipo che sono ignorantissima e non so niente di niente, le cose studiate a scuola sono già un ricordo lontano e di Alessandro non ricordo proprio nulla, quindi alla fine è stata anche una storia che comunque non conoscevo. Mi interessava? Non particolarmente, i pezzi di guerra, di strategia politica, nomi su nomi che non capivo (e pure in ellenico, che mi hanno di nuovo confusa), città, robe... Non mi hanno fatto impazzire quei momenti, però sono andata avanti.
Questo secondo libro rispetto al primo ha una vera e propria trama. Il primo era una accozzaglia di scene, qui invece si ha tutto un filo che va dalle conquiste di Filippo, al matrimonio da cui poi scaturisce l'auto esilio di Alessandro, al suo ritorno e poi al suo diventare re. Nel mezzo ovviamente con tante cosine più o meno belle (per il mio cuore e quella sanità di cui parlavamo).
Partiamo da Alessandro. Eh. Allora. L'ho odiato di brutto per gran parte del libro. Non lo capivo proprio, l'adolescenza lo ha rincretinito. È diventato egoista, vede solo ciò che ha davanti e non ciò che ha intorno, dice una cosa e pensa l'opposto, vive nelle congetture dentro la sua testa, tutto gli è dovuto e agisce in questo senso... senza manco accorgersene! Lo fa spontaneamente. Ed è tonto, è immaturo, non capisce i sentimenti, non si sforza di comprendere quelli degli altri (Efestione *coffcoff*), gira tutto attorno alla sua figura. È lui che non deve apparire debole, che deve dimostrare onore qua, onore là... E veniamo alla sua relazione con Efestione. Declama tanto di amarlo, ma non fa assolutamente nulla per lui. No, è solo un continuo litigio e allontanarsi. Non parlano sti due, ok è anche colpa dell'orgoglio di Efestione, ma quello di Alessandro è più grande. Dice alcune cose belle e il momento dopo le rovina. C'è stata la parte del giuramento che sarebbe dovuta essere sensazionale, e beh sì, Alessandro lì dice delle cose stupende, ma mi è sembrato un po' freddo, forse solo perché lo ha preso come momento ultra solenne. Poi arriva la tipa schiava (di cui ovviamente non ricordo il nome...) e boh... Solo rabbia. Ok, non ha senso arrabbiarsi per una cosa del genere, me ne rendo conto, stiamo parlando dell'antica Grecia. Ma perché Alessandro deve entrare nelle sue cosce quando ha quelle di Efestione? Ah sì, perché con Efestione non fa quasi una mazza. Ah sì, perché amore ed eros sono due cose distinte. Ah sì, Efestione non andrebbe mai con nessun altro a parte te, idiota macedone, mentre tu ti senti obbligato a trovare una con cui ti vada bene. Ripeto, mi rendo conto che è stupido, ma è anche stupido dover per forza andare con un'altra per svuotarsi le palle solo perché è simpatica (parole sue) a dispetto delle altre. "Con te è amore, con lei solo sesso" (altre parole sue). Gna faccio.
Ecco, quindi io sono andata avanti 4 giorni a insultarlo di brutto e a lamentarmi di qualsiasi cosa. E poi. La scena. Ormai al 90% del secondo libro. Che mi apre gli occhi. L'attesa è stata ripagata. Ma tanto. Con la verità più dolce, imbarazzata, sentita, genuina di sempre. Alessandro continua a essere tutto ciò che ho detto sopra, ma adesso mi ha dato una spiegazione a tutto. Ma intendo tutto tutto. Ed è super sensato, è super tenero, super da abbracciò potente. Super da sberle potenti anche, mannaggia. Ed è tutta colpa di Aristotele! Quella vecchia capra! No comment, davvero. Comunque, Alessandro finalmente si mostra, mostra i suoi pensieri, quelli veri, mostra le sue debolezze che tanto odia e capisce che non sono debolezze. Si mostra, si apre. Punto. E il mio cuore si riempie d'amore. Ed è lì che penso "oddio, già ero in crisi, ma adesso sono f0ttuta".
È stata la mia seconda scena preferita, soltanto perché c'è un'altra scena che esprime tantissimo senza il bisogno di nemmeno una parola. Ovvero quando dopo la punizione di Alessandro chiuso in camera come i bambini, lui esce in cortile e vede Efestione insieme agli amici e si butta su di lui. E c'è quell'abbraccio che è proprio un abbraccio dell'anima, si sente nelle ossa. E poi rendono ancora più perfetta la scena gli amici che abbracciano a sua volta Efestione. È stato il momento più bello di tutti. Da lacrime.
E a proposito di Efestione, nel primo avevo detto che non usciva tanto. Beh, nel secondo è il mio bimbo protetto. Please, datemene uno da coccolare che è un pargolo dolce del mio cuore. Pungente, severo, orgoglioso, reale, genuino, non si fa condizionare. Leale, forte, deciso, pronto a sorreggere quando necessario, pronto a sminuirsi per l'onore di Alessandro. Pronto a tutto per lui. Sotto un treno Efestione. Cavolo, è fantastico. E poi si scopre che è demisessuale con un discorso che fa ed è ancora più dolcino. Lui ha fatto un gran salto di qualità. Mi colpisce la sua pragmaticità, ma anche la sua capacità di adattamento. È sempre lui alla fine che deve trattenere, reprimere... Ed esplode, ovvio. Lui sarà pure sotto un treno ma i piedi in testa non se li fa mettere. A lui non interessa che Alessandro è il leoncino di Macedonia, a lui interessa Alessandro, il suo amico di infanzia, il suo amato, il suo amante, il suo tutto. Sparatemi al cuore che facciamo prima. Comunque, lui ha anche una crescita personale niente male.
Tematica centrale del libro è di nuovo il rapporto con la famiglia, ma adesso è sviscerato più in profondità. Abbiamo da una parte Filippo che pensa di amare Alessandro, e sicuro lo fa, ma non è capace. Non sa proprio fare il padre, come dice Amyntor. Semplicemente il re sovrasta il padre. E si chiede come mai Alessandro dubiti di lui e non si fida e lo sfida. Beh, caro, fatti due domande. Lo tratti come un povero mentecatto ribelle. E la cosa triste è che Alessandro, in perenne sfida con lui, è anche in perenne ricerca della sua approvazione. Lui ama suo padre, è inevitabile. E ama sua madre, ma in questo secondo libro la vediamo più con gli occhi da adulto che da bambino che la adora e scopriamo che è molto più serpe e acida. Molto rancorosa, molto spaventosa... Lei ha fatto il salto di qualità al contrario, non l'ho sopportata mai.
Fantastica invece Kleopatra (la sorella, no perché qui la gente ha gli stessi nomi e vai in confusione), penso sia il personaggio secondario meglio riuscito insieme ad Amyntor. Ecco, tornando alle famiglie, Amyntor è un padre eccellente, un marito straordinario, lui fa tutto per Efestione. E infatti si ha questa contrapposizione tra le due famiglie che genere una invidia sana però, molto reale. Oddio, sana ma con qualche risentimento, però non ci si può fare nulla.
Cos'altro? Non so, mi sento un po' prosciugata dopo tutto quello che ho scritto. So che ci sono sicuramente delle tematiche di cui avrei voluto scrivere, ma al momento mi sfuggono.
Un libro partito un po' così, che ho odiato per colpa di Alessandro, ma sotto l'odio c'era la curiosità e poi è diventato una droga sottopelle e non so che diamine sia successo. Il libro, per me e per ciò che mi piace/mi è piaciuto, non è da 10, come già detto, però non riesco a dargli meno del massimo. È un amore/odio che mi porterò sicuramente nel cuore nei prossimi mesi, con tanto di ricerca spasmodica di fanfiction (esistono, vero? No, perché io devo riempire quel buco Alestione che mi manca, voglio le fyccine romance senza il dramma del dopo) e pensieri miei notturni (e fu così che le scrissi io le fanfic).
Sicuramente, se l'autrice continuerà davvero la storia come ha detto, leggerò anche il seguito. Anche se mi spaventa molto sapendo che fine fanno (is not very difficult, la fine è sempre la stessa per tutte ste coppie ahahah) e non mi va di soffrire. Ma, donna, fammi soffrire. Ho bisogno di tutto. Di più.
E così, ho perso anche l'ultimo neurone.
July 30, 2025
Bellissimo!
A differenza del primo libro, questo l’ho praticamente divorato!
Il passaggio a un Alessandro più adulto ha reso la lettura ancora più avvincente. Il rapporto con Efestione, qui molto più presente, è una delle colonne portanti del racconto: un legame profondo e indissolubile, fatto di alti e bassi, tra due personalità forti. Non sorprende che in molti l’abbiano paragonato a quello tra Achille e Patroclo.
In questo volume, Alessandro non è più solo un ragazzo curioso, ma un giovane uomo alle prese con le prime battaglie, gli intrighi di corte e, soprattutto, con il rapporto teso e conflittuale con suo padre Filippo. È proprio quest’ultima dinamica a dare profondità emotiva alla storia, mostrandoci un protagonista ancora in formazione, che cerca disperatamente di essere all’altezza del ruolo che il destino gli ha assegnato.
L’accuratezza con cui vengono descritte scene, usi, costumi ed espressioni ti catapulta davvero in un mondo lontano, che spesso conosciamo solo dai libri di scuola. Qui, invece, la narrazione restituisce calore, vita e umanità: riusciamo finalmente a vedere l’uomo dietro il mito, e a comprendere meglio le radici della sua grandezza.
Ho apprezzato moltissimo anche la scelta dell’autrice di alternare il punto di vista, passando spesso ad altri personaggi. Questo arricchisce la trama di spunti e riflessioni che altrimenti ci saremmo persi, offrendo un quadro più ampio e sfaccettato non solo di Alessandro, ma anche del contesto storico e delle persone che lo circondavano.
Ho amato in particolare il fatto che l’autrice si sia soffermata su questa prima fase della sua vita. Tutti conosciamo il grande conquistatore, ma pochi raccontano il giovane che ha dovuto dimostrare di meritare quel titolo.
Se amate le storie intense, i legami profondi e i personaggi storici raccontati con sensibilità e accuratezza, non potete assolutamente perderlo.
5⭐️+++++
A differenza del primo libro, questo l’ho praticamente divorato!
Il passaggio a un Alessandro più adulto ha reso la lettura ancora più avvincente. Il rapporto con Efestione, qui molto più presente, è una delle colonne portanti del racconto: un legame profondo e indissolubile, fatto di alti e bassi, tra due personalità forti. Non sorprende che in molti l’abbiano paragonato a quello tra Achille e Patroclo.
In questo volume, Alessandro non è più solo un ragazzo curioso, ma un giovane uomo alle prese con le prime battaglie, gli intrighi di corte e, soprattutto, con il rapporto teso e conflittuale con suo padre Filippo. È proprio quest’ultima dinamica a dare profondità emotiva alla storia, mostrandoci un protagonista ancora in formazione, che cerca disperatamente di essere all’altezza del ruolo che il destino gli ha assegnato.
L’accuratezza con cui vengono descritte scene, usi, costumi ed espressioni ti catapulta davvero in un mondo lontano, che spesso conosciamo solo dai libri di scuola. Qui, invece, la narrazione restituisce calore, vita e umanità: riusciamo finalmente a vedere l’uomo dietro il mito, e a comprendere meglio le radici della sua grandezza.
Ho apprezzato moltissimo anche la scelta dell’autrice di alternare il punto di vista, passando spesso ad altri personaggi. Questo arricchisce la trama di spunti e riflessioni che altrimenti ci saremmo persi, offrendo un quadro più ampio e sfaccettato non solo di Alessandro, ma anche del contesto storico e delle persone che lo circondavano.
Ho amato in particolare il fatto che l’autrice si sia soffermata su questa prima fase della sua vita. Tutti conosciamo il grande conquistatore, ma pochi raccontano il giovane che ha dovuto dimostrare di meritare quel titolo.
Se amate le storie intense, i legami profondi e i personaggi storici raccontati con sensibilità e accuratezza, non potete assolutamente perderlo.
5⭐️+++++
November 20, 2023
RECENSIONE A CURA DI ELYXYZ
Questo secondo volume conclude la dilogia sul giovane Alessandro Magno e, a differenza di altri libri anche m/m che ho letto su di lui, è concentrato solo sulla sua vita da giovane, prima che diventasse effettivamente “Magno” per merito delle sue conquiste e del suo valore.
Qui lo si intravede ancora come un diamante grezzo, e solo la quotidianità dell’epoca – con i suoi scontri, i problemi, la vita a palazzo e in battaglia – limerà via le imperfezioni fino a permettergli di brillare come ci insegna la storia.
L’autrice ci regala uno spaccato verosimile del quadro storico, dove un tocco di sovrannaturale è quasi doveroso, e dove miti e leggende, Dèi propizi o capricciosi, si mescolano nella vita dei vari personaggi, che non trascurano offerte votive o gesti scaramantici.
Jeanne Reames è una grande studiosa dell’argomento e in calce al testo si possono trovare tante curiosità e approfondimenti, nonché la sua spiegazione di come ha scelto di raccontare i fatti, a volte rifacendosi a testi storici e altre a leggende più o meno plausibili.
Questo libro è prima di tutto un romanzo storico, che narra della vita del protagonista dalla fine dell’adolescenza all’inizio dell’età adulta.
Continua sul nostro blog!
Questo secondo volume conclude la dilogia sul giovane Alessandro Magno e, a differenza di altri libri anche m/m che ho letto su di lui, è concentrato solo sulla sua vita da giovane, prima che diventasse effettivamente “Magno” per merito delle sue conquiste e del suo valore.
Qui lo si intravede ancora come un diamante grezzo, e solo la quotidianità dell’epoca – con i suoi scontri, i problemi, la vita a palazzo e in battaglia – limerà via le imperfezioni fino a permettergli di brillare come ci insegna la storia.
L’autrice ci regala uno spaccato verosimile del quadro storico, dove un tocco di sovrannaturale è quasi doveroso, e dove miti e leggende, Dèi propizi o capricciosi, si mescolano nella vita dei vari personaggi, che non trascurano offerte votive o gesti scaramantici.
Jeanne Reames è una grande studiosa dell’argomento e in calce al testo si possono trovare tante curiosità e approfondimenti, nonché la sua spiegazione di come ha scelto di raccontare i fatti, a volte rifacendosi a testi storici e altre a leggende più o meno plausibili.
Questo libro è prima di tutto un romanzo storico, che narra della vita del protagonista dalla fine dell’adolescenza all’inizio dell’età adulta.
Continua sul nostro blog!
February 13, 2024
Mi è piaciuto, come previsto anche più del primo, anche perché ho trovato che qui si sia un pochino stemperata l'atmosfera YA e anche nel rapporto tra i due ci si sia concentrati di più sulla parte caratteriale e sulla problematica legata al tempo.
Tuttavia...
L'autrice in fondo ha messo tutte le note e tutte le ragioni per le sue scelte narrative (anche rispetto a come ha scelto di descrivere o interpretare determinati avvenimenti), dimostrando di saperne parecchio dell'argomento trattato.
E, per sua stessa ammissione, ha operato la scelta di rendere l'atmosfera del romanzo, soprattutto sui dialoghi, più moderna che arcaica. Legittimo e l'avevo anche già compreso. Il problema è che forse per noi la figura di Alessandro Magno è così ammantata da quell'aura che certe figure storiche hanno che fa strano che so, vederlo fare il dito medio per quanto possa essere storicamente accurato.
Ciò nonostante, credo che sia stato un esperimento interessante e sono contenta che esista una storia semplice dedicata non tanto alla figura di Alessandro ma al suo rapporto con Efestione. Se l'autrice, come dice, scriverà anche oltre di loro due leggerò volentieri.
Tuttavia...
L'autrice in fondo ha messo tutte le note e tutte le ragioni per le sue scelte narrative (anche rispetto a come ha scelto di descrivere o interpretare determinati avvenimenti), dimostrando di saperne parecchio dell'argomento trattato.
E, per sua stessa ammissione, ha operato la scelta di rendere l'atmosfera del romanzo, soprattutto sui dialoghi, più moderna che arcaica. Legittimo e l'avevo anche già compreso. Il problema è che forse per noi la figura di Alessandro Magno è così ammantata da quell'aura che certe figure storiche hanno che fa strano che so, vederlo fare il dito medio per quanto possa essere storicamente accurato.
Ciò nonostante, credo che sia stato un esperimento interessante e sono contenta che esista una storia semplice dedicata non tanto alla figura di Alessandro ma al suo rapporto con Efestione. Se l'autrice, come dice, scriverà anche oltre di loro due leggerò volentieri.
June 14, 2024
i wrote more in depth about the DwtL series in my medium blog:
https://medium.com/@cpinillad/reclaim...
but in regards to this particular book, i have to say that i enjoyed it even more than the first one (that 4-star review is really closer to a 4.5). i loved the sweet beginnings of alexandros and hephaistion's relationship, but i am a sucker for couples actually communicating their issues-- even in the form of an argument. communication is hot, people. and there was a LOT of that here, and i truly appreciate how they maneuvered around social limitations specific to ancient macedon, different than how we see them now, but still resonant. i love how strong their bond is.
i really, really hope jeanne reames plans to continue this series. we know they didn't have that long a history, sadly, but i'd gladly read it in its entirety.
now i'm off to read the deleted scenes.
https://medium.com/@cpinillad/reclaim...
but in regards to this particular book, i have to say that i enjoyed it even more than the first one (that 4-star review is really closer to a 4.5). i loved the sweet beginnings of alexandros and hephaistion's relationship, but i am a sucker for couples actually communicating their issues-- even in the form of an argument. communication is hot, people. and there was a LOT of that here, and i truly appreciate how they maneuvered around social limitations specific to ancient macedon, different than how we see them now, but still resonant. i love how strong their bond is.
i really, really hope jeanne reames plans to continue this series. we know they didn't have that long a history, sadly, but i'd gladly read it in its entirety.
now i'm off to read the deleted scenes.
May 27, 2023
There is very little battle-sequence violence/gore in this follow-up volume compared to its predecessor - possibly because the focus of the book centers directly on Alexander's changing relationships with family members, political power-holders and of course his lover Hephaistion. Our MC is now nearing his age of maturity despite having proven his nous, bravery and fighting mettle on-field - and his decisions and actions took on consequences and results that neither he nor those close to him expected. The book concludes with Alexandros being handed the 'keys of kingdom' and with no further books in the offing, confirms the marketing of these two books as The story of Alexander before he became “the Great.”. Indeed, the author did a credible job in bringing vividly to life a teen-aged king in the making.
July 10, 2024
EL FINAL????? HABLAMOS DEL FINAL??????? Nunca seré la misma persona después de esto🧍🧍
Quiero añadir también que la relación de ellos dos está INCREÍBLEMENTE escrita.
"I'm scared of loving you too much, I know I wouldn't be able to sacrifice you, even as a king" ESO LO DICE TODO
Quiero añadir también que la relación de ellos dos está INCREÍBLEMENTE escrita.
"I'm scared of loving you too much, I know I wouldn't be able to sacrifice you, even as a king" ESO LO DICE TODO
August 15, 2022
No me gustó para nada, Alejo me ha caído muy mal. Es caprichoso y egoísta. Me no da mucha pena Hefestion, se ve merecía algo mejor.
October 16, 2019
This was a great continuation from the first book. Things are starting to heat up politically and there's plenty of problems getting in the way of love. The amount of research that went into this series is phenomenal. Even for those who aren't interested in this period in history, the story carry itself well!
February 29, 2020
“I know you didn’t want Hephaistion to come to Pella, but I think he might have saved my life. That’s not hyperbole. I had nobody, not really. Then he showed up. He cared about me, not the prince. I’ll love him forever for that.”
Dancing with the Lion: Rise continues the story of Alexander the Great before he became the legendary conqueror. This book begins as his father, Philippos, makes him the regent of Macedon and starts giving him more and more responsibilities. But, much to his father's annoyance, Alexandros quickly begins to make a name for himself and to earn the love and devotion of his future people, which creates even more friction between father and son. And as Alexandros becomes more and more powerful, his love affair with Hephaistion deepens, which brings its own problems, mainly, how to balance being a king devoted to his people and a young man deeply and passionately in love.
I liked this book a lot and preferred it to the first book in this duology. Rise had a very different feel to it than Becoming - there's much more politics, war, death and drama, which I liked. In the first book it occasionally felt like the story lacked stakes - in Rise, this is not an issue.
Rise focused very much on two things: Alexandros' relationship with Philippos, and his relationship with Hephaistion, both of which were handled very well. Alexandros and Philippos are a fascinating pair - they're very similar in many ways and they love each other in their own messed up way but are both utterly incapable of showing it. I liked how the book explored this and how Philippos wasn't written to be this one-dimensional shitty dad with no redeeming qualities - no, it is made clear that he loves his son, which makes his inability to show this and his abusive tendencies even more horrifying and frustrating. Alexandros and Hephaistion on the other hand were just wonderful. I love the way they trust one another, the way they fit together and how much they adore each other. As it says in the quote above, Hephaistion is the only one who loves Alexandros as he is - he does not want anything from the prince, he just wants to be with him. He tells him the truth as it is and I love the honesty and purity of their relationship (and by pure I mean that they just love each other, there are no ulterior motives between them). I enjoyed following them navigating their relationship at court and figuring out how to stay together when his duties start demanding more and more of Alexandros' time and despite people whispering around them and Alexandros' parents disapproving of them.
Another thing I really liked about Rise was how more time was given to female characters. Kleopatra, Alexandros' sister, got some nice scenes in this book and I liked how Reames explored the unfair position of women in Ancient cultures through her. She is a princess and has a certain amount of power, but she is still just a puppet for her father to marry off to whomever he chooses. She has no agency over her own life. Kleopatra is a nice character and I liked the stuff we got with her, and, like I already did in the first book, I loved her relationship with Alexandros. They were precious. The most notable new female character, Kampaspe, was also a nice addition into the story.
All in all, I really liked this book - and this whole duology. Becoming had some issues, but Rise was a lot better and I enjoyed it a lot. I'm kinda sad there are no more books with these versions of Alexandros, Hephaistion, Ptolemaios and the rest, but I can live with it. And a part of me does like how this duology is focused on Alexandros before he becomes Alexander the Great - they're not books about the wars he fought or the cities he conquered, they're books about his greatest love, his parents, his siblings, his struggles to gain his father's respect and him growing and becoming someone his men will follow anywhere.
Dancing with the Lion: Rise continues the story of Alexander the Great before he became the legendary conqueror. This book begins as his father, Philippos, makes him the regent of Macedon and starts giving him more and more responsibilities. But, much to his father's annoyance, Alexandros quickly begins to make a name for himself and to earn the love and devotion of his future people, which creates even more friction between father and son. And as Alexandros becomes more and more powerful, his love affair with Hephaistion deepens, which brings its own problems, mainly, how to balance being a king devoted to his people and a young man deeply and passionately in love.
I liked this book a lot and preferred it to the first book in this duology. Rise had a very different feel to it than Becoming - there's much more politics, war, death and drama, which I liked. In the first book it occasionally felt like the story lacked stakes - in Rise, this is not an issue.
Rise focused very much on two things: Alexandros' relationship with Philippos, and his relationship with Hephaistion, both of which were handled very well. Alexandros and Philippos are a fascinating pair - they're very similar in many ways and they love each other in their own messed up way but are both utterly incapable of showing it. I liked how the book explored this and how Philippos wasn't written to be this one-dimensional shitty dad with no redeeming qualities - no, it is made clear that he loves his son, which makes his inability to show this and his abusive tendencies even more horrifying and frustrating. Alexandros and Hephaistion on the other hand were just wonderful. I love the way they trust one another, the way they fit together and how much they adore each other. As it says in the quote above, Hephaistion is the only one who loves Alexandros as he is - he does not want anything from the prince, he just wants to be with him. He tells him the truth as it is and I love the honesty and purity of their relationship (and by pure I mean that they just love each other, there are no ulterior motives between them). I enjoyed following them navigating their relationship at court and figuring out how to stay together when his duties start demanding more and more of Alexandros' time and despite people whispering around them and Alexandros' parents disapproving of them.
Another thing I really liked about Rise was how more time was given to female characters. Kleopatra, Alexandros' sister, got some nice scenes in this book and I liked how Reames explored the unfair position of women in Ancient cultures through her. She is a princess and has a certain amount of power, but she is still just a puppet for her father to marry off to whomever he chooses. She has no agency over her own life. Kleopatra is a nice character and I liked the stuff we got with her, and, like I already did in the first book, I loved her relationship with Alexandros. They were precious. The most notable new female character, Kampaspe, was also a nice addition into the story.
All in all, I really liked this book - and this whole duology. Becoming had some issues, but Rise was a lot better and I enjoyed it a lot. I'm kinda sad there are no more books with these versions of Alexandros, Hephaistion, Ptolemaios and the rest, but I can live with it. And a part of me does like how this duology is focused on Alexandros before he becomes Alexander the Great - they're not books about the wars he fought or the cities he conquered, they're books about his greatest love, his parents, his siblings, his struggles to gain his father's respect and him growing and becoming someone his men will follow anywhere.
April 21, 2022
This review does not contain spoilers for Dancing with the Lion but does discuss historical events.
I came for the romance but stayed for the fleshed out relationships between the main characters and the supporting cast. Let me explain: before reading Dancing with the Lion, I read Renault’s Alexander Trilogy but came away feeling that certain historical events like the torture of Philotas, the assassination of Parmenion, the death of Cleitus the Black, the death of Hephaestion were imbued with strong emotional significance that wasn’t fleshed out in those novels, so the emotional payoff felt unearned.
In Dancing with the Lion, the relationships between Alexander, Hephaestion, Philotas, Kleitos the Black, Parmenion, and other figures important in Alexander’s later campaigns are portrayed in a detailed, nuanced, and convincing manner. Watching the conflict between Hephaestion and Philotas unfold in Dancing with the Lion while knowing the fate that awaits the later in Asia provided extremely satisfying instances of (perhaps unintentional) dramatic irony. The few scenes between Kleitos and Alexandros in this book drove home the horror and tragedy around his death by Alexander’s hand in a way Fire from Heaven & The Persian Boy weren’t able to achieve.
Reames’ portrayal of Hephaestion and his relationship with Alexander also felt more convincing than Renault’s. The emotional climax of Renault’s “Persian Boy” drew its power from the enormity of Alexander’s grief over Hephaestion’s death and its poetic fulfillment of the Achilles myth, without bothering to flesh out Hephaestion as a character (he is as much as cipher in Persian Boy as he is in Fire from Heaven). In contrast, Reames takes the time to explore Hephaestion and his relationship to Alexander in the context of their social roles, masculinity, polygamy, sexuality, and romantic friendship. By the end of this book, Hephaestion and Alexander feel like the life partners they’d eventually become and remain for the rest of their lives. It is a shame that Dancing with the Lion could not cover the rest of Hephaestion and Alexander’s lives. I would love to read Reames’ version of the events from Alexander’s ascension to the throne to his death in Babylon.
From a character building perspective, this series is much better than Renault’s Fire from Heaven, although the later is more artistic and literary.
I came for the romance but stayed for the fleshed out relationships between the main characters and the supporting cast. Let me explain: before reading Dancing with the Lion, I read Renault’s Alexander Trilogy but came away feeling that certain historical events like the torture of Philotas, the assassination of Parmenion, the death of Cleitus the Black, the death of Hephaestion were imbued with strong emotional significance that wasn’t fleshed out in those novels, so the emotional payoff felt unearned.
In Dancing with the Lion, the relationships between Alexander, Hephaestion, Philotas, Kleitos the Black, Parmenion, and other figures important in Alexander’s later campaigns are portrayed in a detailed, nuanced, and convincing manner. Watching the conflict between Hephaestion and Philotas unfold in Dancing with the Lion while knowing the fate that awaits the later in Asia provided extremely satisfying instances of (perhaps unintentional) dramatic irony. The few scenes between Kleitos and Alexandros in this book drove home the horror and tragedy around his death by Alexander’s hand in a way Fire from Heaven & The Persian Boy weren’t able to achieve.
Reames’ portrayal of Hephaestion and his relationship with Alexander also felt more convincing than Renault’s. The emotional climax of Renault’s “Persian Boy” drew its power from the enormity of Alexander’s grief over Hephaestion’s death and its poetic fulfillment of the Achilles myth, without bothering to flesh out Hephaestion as a character (he is as much as cipher in Persian Boy as he is in Fire from Heaven). In contrast, Reames takes the time to explore Hephaestion and his relationship to Alexander in the context of their social roles, masculinity, polygamy, sexuality, and romantic friendship. By the end of this book, Hephaestion and Alexander feel like the life partners they’d eventually become and remain for the rest of their lives. It is a shame that Dancing with the Lion could not cover the rest of Hephaestion and Alexander’s lives. I would love to read Reames’ version of the events from Alexander’s ascension to the throne to his death in Babylon.
From a character building perspective, this series is much better than Renault’s Fire from Heaven, although the later is more artistic and literary.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 74 reviews