Cass Sunstein is one of the weirder writers out there
He's said so much crazy shit over the years, he's actually enjoyable reading.
one review that sticks in my mind said something like, imagine if someone never watched star wars, and never had an original thought, this would be the book.
All the bad reviews you see here are quite true... and it's sad to think that Sunstein just takes his own opinions, and squishes them through the lens of Star Wars [or even The Wizard of Oz] and comes out with what he claims are facts.
Honestly, if Sunstein wrote a book on the Philosophy of Star Trek, and you noticed that 90% of the book is the author's interpretation of the US Constitution, and trying to tie it into Shatner and Nimoy, would you be impressed?
Would you be impressed with him trying to hijack Starfleet for his own wacky bugaboos?
I think i'd rather read a Freudian interpretation of Star Wars....
others might prefer having their eyes poked out with a fork
Heck, watch Joseph Campbell talking about the Mythology of Star Wars, at least Lucas admitted to ripping off some of his ideas, and though i cringe at Campbell comparing the Greek Myths and everything else under the sun through the lens of Star Wars, at least it's a very decent television series of Campbell dealing with the film.
Honestly, lunatics on reddit have better things to say...
The book should simply be called
The World According to Cass Sunstein,
or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and added Star Wars in the Title so this Turd would Sell
---
Wikipedia says it all
that he's a complete nutcase
In one breath he's saying the movie Star Wars is all about Freedom of Choice, and in another breath he's saying that Freedom of Speech is dangerous.
And then he thinks that that the coronavirus is something that most people shouldn't worry about it, and don't change your travel plans.
Exhibit A:
Sunstein published frequently during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. On February 28, 2020, nearly a month after the World Health Organization declared a global health emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Sunstein wrote for Bloomberg Opinion that "a lot of people are more scared than they have any reason to be" and that they have "an exaggerated sense of their own personal risk". He argued that "most people in North America and Europe do not need to worry much about the risk of contracting the disease." In his view, there was "no adequate reason" to change travel plans or other socioeconomic behaviors, since they risk "plummeting stock prices".
Exhibit B:
Conspiracy Theories and government infiltration
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled "Conspiracy Theories," dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from "cascades" of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence... They go on to propose that, "the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups", where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories:
(1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing.
(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.
(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.
(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting "nongovernmental officials"; they suggest that "government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes," further warning that "too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed."
Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, "might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves.... This position has been criticized by some commentators who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.
......
Right there, you get an instant foul taste in your mouth for the author
loopy as they come