In this review I wish to discuss this book titled On Writing and Worldbuilding Volume I by Timothy Hickson in detail. Hickson is a popular YouTube personality known for his Avatar the Last Airbender videos. This post's goal is to warn those new to the craft of writing and worldbuilding not to purchase this book.
First, a short summary. Timothy Hickson operates a successful YouTube channel predominantly focused on Avatar the Last Airbender, Writing and Worldbuilding. Hickson never published any piece of his own writing. To anyone with some writing experience his videos are lacking in depth and appeal to the younger "RanDoM" audience. From sudden interruption of otherwise quite well put together videos to shout DEUS VULT INFIDELS, as if that's even remotely funny, to mentions of the Supreme Leader Mishka, Hickson's cat, his videos are not exactly on par with those made by published authors.
Now to the book. I do apologize for the overall negative tone this review will have but I am of the opinion that books such as this can extremely harm new writers and cause them to watch hours of YouTube videos rather than actually writing. The review on both Goodreads and Amazon are filled with fans of the author's YouTube channel and a very critical, yet honest and fair, review was shouted out on Twitter by the author sending his fans to defend him, on purpose or not it's in poor taste.
First, let us look at the listing on Amazon.
"Writing advice tends to be full of 'rules' and 'tips' which are either too broad to be helpful or outright wrong. In On Writing and Worldbuilding, we will discuss specific and applicable ideas to consider, from effective methods of delivering exposition and foreshadowing, to how communication, commerce, and control play into the fall of an empire."
Let us dissect this a bit before we go further. The major issue lies with the first sentence. Yes there are rules and tips that are broad, but I'd never say that they are wrong. It depends of course on what advice author is referring to. Is it your run of the mill reddit post or an advice given by a published author? We don't know. There is also an issue with the word broad. There is a reason why much of writing advice is extremely broad, it's to be helpful to most people even if just little. Specific writing advice is extremely subjective and heavily depends on the story you are trying to tell.
Then we get to the second major issue with the description. It doesn't specify for whom and what genre the book relates to. We can, based on the title alone, presume it's applicable across genres and touches on both fiction and non-fiction writing. That is of course not true, the book is focused on fantasy far more than anything else.
In the last portion of the description we can find a real example of what we just may learn, "effective methods of delivering exposition and foreshadowing, to how communication, commerce, and control play into the fall of an empire," describes only three of the authors videos. This is not original to the book, these are real videos on his channel - I am not sure if I am allowed to post links so I won't.
The description isn't exactly bad but in it are hidden the problems of this 'book' including what it really is. It's his YouTube scripts lazily thrown into a word documents and published as a book. It's not really original, it reads as YouTube scripts. The jokes and references to Avatar and his cat are not so dominant but still present.
"For those of you who have never watched Avatar (which, given you bought this book, is extremely unlikely), I am unsure whether I should (a) imprison you and pin your eyes open, forcing you to watch all sixty-one episodes or (b) exile you to the uncivilized lands where good storytelling does not grace you. However, as a kind overlord, and for the pretenses of this book, I should give those few plebeians amongst you a rundown."
This is an actual quote from the book. Here the author calls those who are not familiar with a cartoon plebeians and implies that they cannot distinguish "good storytelling". I find this, even though it's clearly meant as a joke, extremely inappropriate for what is attempting, poorly one must admit, to be an educational piece of writing.
Avatar is a major issue of not just the book but the author's YouTube channel as well. While I can forgive mentioning Avatar in a YouTube video that's clearly marketed to younger and writers who see writing more as hobby than anything else, I cannot forgive this in a book that is marketed to writers and those who wish to get better at the craft.
The book has 17 chapters. They are separated into three categories.
ON WRITING
Part I: Prologues
Part II: The First Chapter
Part III: The Exposition Problem
Part IV: Foreshadowing
Part V: Villain Motivation
Part VI: Hero-Villain Relationships
Part VII: Final Battles
Part VIII: The Chosen One
Part IX: Hard Magic Systems
Part X: Soft Magic Systems
Part XI: Magic Systems and Storytelling
ON WORLDBUILDING
Part XII: Polytheistic Religions
Part XIII: Hidden Magical Worlds
Part XIV: How Empires Rise
Part XV: How Empires Work
Part XVI: How Empires Fall
EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
Part XVII: How I Plan a Novel
Yes, the only chapter that is unique to this book and is not a recycled YouTube script is XVII and it's about how the author plans a novel. Let me remind this is a man who has never published a book before, this is his first publication. Not only you are meant to pay for this advice, but you are expected to want to hear his personal approach rather than advice supported by various sources.
Avatar The Last Airbender (or Legend of Korra, the cartoon's sequel) are mentioned in every chapter but two (X, XIII). In most either one is listed as a primary source and in an entire chapter (or part as the author calls them) Avatar is the ONLY source, that is where the insulting quote from before comes from.
Let's look at other sources the author provides:
Song of Ice and Fire
Doctor Who
Harry Potter
Eragon
Percy Jackson
The Matrix
Lord of the Rings
Star Wars
The Avengers
I think you get the idea here. Majority of these are the most widely popular things on offer and almost everything mentioned has a movie/tv show adaptation. Not to say the author does not provide sources from other books, Brandon Sanderson's work appears quite often, Issac Asimov, Blake Snyder, Ernest Hemingway, William Shakespeare and more appear as a listed source. The issue is that Avatar is still the major source for all but two chapters. The author obviously adores that cartoon and he wants his readers to watch it, like a spoiled child who complains someone doesn't know what Pikachu is. It may come as a surprise that Avatar isn't exactly to best place where to gain insight into worldbuilding and writing.
Finally, this book has very little in it. The chapters are short (book is only 243 pages) and they're a YouTube video script, the contrast between the final "exclusive" chapter and the rest is jarring to say the least. I much enjoyed the last chapter even if I don't want advice about writing from someone like the author. The very favored defense of his fans is that you don't need to publish before you write about it, if you studied it enough and provide enough sources and then they, all proud of themselves for protecting their favorite content creator, they show you the list of all those sources.
That's not how it works. This is still the author's interpretation of those works. He doesn't cite anything but fiction, a lot of which are movies and TV shows lessening the advice as there isn't a word about writing movie scripts. Why does it really matter? Writing is an art form, it's extremely difficult to be a good artist. Painters, sculptors, tailors, designers,... and writers are all artists and art can't be subjugated to a number of rules too easily. There are valid 'rules' and pieces of advice that come from people with decades of experience. What is even more important is that such rules and advice can't be verified. There isn't a scholarly source to cite, so all that matters when a piece of advice is given is who is it from and even then you must take it with a grain of salt.
Stephen King says that a first draft shouldn't take longer than three months. There isn't a way to verify it, because the advice is true only for some people. I disagree with King's take, greatly mind you, but I still listen and consider what he says because he is an accomplished author. If George R.R. Martin came up to me and gave me advice I would listen to it, I may not utilize it but I will listen given his experience with the craft.
This attempt at a book is the same as the author's YouTube videos. It's goal is to waste time instead of writing. There is little you can learn besides how great Avatar The Last Airbender is. I voiced my view on Goodreads but in the flood of positive reviews by fans my voice is futile.
I urge you not to purchase this book. It's awful. If you want to get this advice he's offering watch it on YouTube for free. It's the same, this book looks barely edited.
I could go in detail chapter by chapter but this review is long enough.