Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “الحرية” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Read Book* *Different edition

الحرية

John Stuart Mill,

طه السباعي (ترجمة)

3.96 · Rating details · 26,951 ratings · 853 reviews

هذا الكتاب أشهر من أن يعرف به، فقد انتشر في كل البلاد وبكل اللغات. وهو يعد بحق دستور الحرية الأعظم

Get A Copy

Paperback, الطبعة الأولى, 223 pages

Published 2019 by آفاق للنشر والتوزيع (first published April 1859)

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about الحرية, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.96 ·

Rating details

· 26,951 ratings · 853 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of الحرية

Aug 25, 2008 Stephen rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: easton-press, life-changers, polly-sighs-and-pubic-policy, 1800s, all-time-favorites, 6-star-books, classics-european

WARNING: Some of my political views are discussed in this VERY LONG review. I don't think there is anything offensive but with politics, you never know. Therefore, in case anything I say upsets anyone, I have included several very CUTE kitten photos by way of apology.

6.0 stars. On Liberty has secured a spot on my list of “All Time Favorite” books. I have gone through a pretty significant political re-examination over the last several years (maybe a lot of us have). A few years ago, if you were ...more

flag 109 likes · Like · see review

Jun 10, 2019 Ahmad Sharabiani rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, historical, political, classic, science, british, european, literature, philosophy, essay

On Liberty, John Stuart Mill
On Liberty is a philosophical work by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill, originally intended as a short essay. The work, published in 1859, applies Mill's ethical system of utilitarianism to society and the state. Mill attempts to establish standards for the relationship between authority and liberty. He emphasizes the importance of individuality, which he conceived as a prerequisite to the higher pleasures—the summum bonum (The highest good) of On Liberty, John Stuart Mill
On Liberty is a philosophical work by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill, originally intended as a short essay. The work, published in 1859, applies Mill's ethical system of utilitarianism to society and the state. Mill attempts to establish standards for the relationship between authority and liberty. He emphasizes the importance of individuality, which he conceived as a prerequisite to the higher pleasures—the summum bonum (The highest good) of utilitarianism. Furthermore, Mill criticizes the errors of past attempts to defend individuality where, for example, democratic ideals resulted in the "tyranny of the majority". Among the standards established in this work are Mill's three basic liberties of individuals, his three legitimate objections to government intervention, and his two maxims regarding the relationship of the individual to society.
تاریخ نخستین خوانش: سال 1970 میلادی
عنان: رساله در باره آزادی؛ نویسنده: جان استوارت میل؛ مترجم: محمدجواد شیخ الاسلامی؛ تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب، 1338، چاپ دیگر 1348؛ در 269 ص؛ 1349، در 306 ص؛ عنوان دیگر: تاملاتی در حکومت انتخابی؛ عنوان دیگر: آزادی، نشر سال 1340؛ چاپ دیگر: تهران، علمی فرهنگی، 1363؛ چاپ دیگر: 1375، در 416 ص؛ شابک: 9644450094؛ چاپ دیگر: 1385؛ موضوع: آزادی از نویسندگان انگلیسی - سده 19 م
دربارهٔ آزادی؛ رساله‌ ای فلسفی، نوشته فیلسوف بریتانیایی، «جان استوارت میل» در سال 1859 میلادی است. این رساله برای خوانشگران دوره ی ویکتوریایی، درون‌مایه‌ ای تندورانه داشت، زیرا از اخلاق فردی پشتیبانی کرده، و بر رهایی اقتصادی از دولت تأکید می‌کند. در این رساله، «جان استوارت میل» یکی از پیچیده‌ ترین مفاهیم فلسفی، یعنی «آزادی» را، مورد پژوهش قرار داده، و کوشیده‌ است «حدود آزادی فردی»، و اصول آن را روشنتر سازد، و رابطه ی آنرا با قدرت و سلطه ی اجتماع، نشان دهد. مدل «جان استوارت میل» از مردم‌سالاری، یک مدل اخلاقی، در میان مدل‌های «دموکراسی لیبرال» است، که بر شکوفایی انسان تأکید دارد. ایشان در رساله ی: «دربارهٔ آزادی»، که یکی از آثار نام آشنای ایشانست، ضمن دفاع از آزادی، علیه دو خطر، می‌گویند: «… اگر ما افراد جامعه را آزاد بگذاریم، که زندگانی خود را به هر نحوی که دل‌شان خواست ترتیب بدهند، و در همان حال از آن‌ها بخواهیم که ذوق و سلیقه انفرادی همدیگر را تحمل کنند (نه اینکه همدیگر را مجبور سازند که مطابق میل و سلیقه دیگران زندگانی کنند) در آن صورت برای ساختن دنیایی همکاری کرده‌ ایم که زندگانی بشر در آن با سود و سعادت حقیقی توأم‌ شدنی است … امروز تقریباً هیچ نیازی به توضیح یا اثبات این نظر نیست که ما نباید به یک هیئت مقننه یا مجریه که منافعش با منافع خلق یکی نیست اجازه دهیم که برای افراد جامعه عقیده تجویز کند یا اینکه تصمیم بگیرد که چه نوع نظرات و دلایل باید به گوش مردم برسد…؛ دوران زجر و کیفر دادن به نویسندگان و ناشران به جرم مطالبی که نوشته، و عقایدی که پخش کرده‌ اند به پایان رسیده‌ است.»؛ ا. شربیانی ...more

flag 51 likes · Like · see review

Jun 01, 2017 notgettingenough rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: sociology, pre20th-century

Anybody interested in free speech must surely be concerned with the situation of Bret Weinstein in the US. See for instance his hour interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fEAP...

One can only be deeply ashamed that non-conservative media has (I understand) all but ignored this story. Curious to have a statement of why this is so, I've written to NPR to find out why they have not reported one word on it. I am waiting for a response.

Meanwhile, John Stuart Mill's words to remind us of ...more

flag 41 likes · Like · see review

Jul 03, 2018 Rebecca McNutt rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: law, non-fiction, political, classic, philosophy

I've been meaning to read this old classic for a long time now, and I'm really glad I finally got around to it. Regardless of whether or not you agree with its ideas, On Liberty is certainly worth a look at. In its short but complex look at society and individuality, it manages to reach law, philosophy and politics all at once and really leave you thinking. Unfortunately my mom took the copy of it we have to Belize before I could finish the last two pages so technically I didn't complete it, but ...more

flag 35 likes · Like · see review

Jan 13, 2015 Jonfaith rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: theory

Eccentricity has always abounded when and where strength of character has abounded; and the amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage which it contained.

It would be pretentious to suggest I dedicated my reading to Ahmed Merabet, yet it would be untrue to exclaim otherwise. We've drowned in debate about liberty this last week. Somehow I regard that as most encouraging. I found Mill’s treatise riveting and incisive ...more

flag 19 likes · Like · see review

Dec 08, 2018 Ian rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: 5-star-non-fiction, society, philosophy, classics

Written in the 1850s, parts of this classic text are a little dated, but mostly it remains surprisingly relevant to the modern world. Probably it’s most famous for its second chapter, where Mill gives an impassioned defence of free speech. It’s noticeable that he sees social pressure as a more insidious threat to free speech than government legislation. How relevant is the quote below to the modern phenomenon of the social media mob?

“…there needs protection also against the tyranny of the Written in the 1850s, parts of this classic text are a little dated, but mostly it remains surprisingly relevant to the modern world. Probably it’s most famous for its second chapter, where Mill gives an impassioned defence of free speech. It’s noticeable that he sees social pressure as a more insidious threat to free speech than government legislation. How relevant is the quote below to the modern phenomenon of the social media mob?

“…there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose, by means other than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them…”

The free speech chapter is the best argued part of the book, and it’s beyond my ability to summarise it accurately in a review. Perhaps for me the most persuasive argument, was that anyone who refuses to allow another’s opinion to be voiced does so because they assume their own certainty represents absolute certainty, therefore:

“All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility.”

In the third chapter, on individuality, Mill once again reveals his strong aversion to conformity, and he condemns the tendency of people to comply with social expectations rather than follow their own nature. In this chapter he raises what later became known as the Needham Question – why was it that China, once so powerful, had become so weak? Mill thought the decline was caused by an over rigid enforcement of custom:

“A people, it appears, may be progressive for a certain length of time, and then stop: when does it stop? When it ceases to possess individuality.”

I found this a little tendentious, but overall the chapter still has much to commend it.

In Chapter IV, Mill considers the proper limits of government power. He had a deep suspicion of government, something he shared with most educated Britons of his era. In the book he strongly opposes government interference with trade and industry, beyond basic requirements such as preventing fraud or maintaining hygiene. He also opposes the idea, commonly accepted in Europe today, that governments should intervene to protect people from themselves. For Mill, if someone wanted to drink or gamble to excess, or smoke opium; that was their business. Governments and charities could attempt to educate people into taking a different path but could not compel them to do so. He does however argue for compulsory schooling of children, which was not in place at the time.

In modern terms libertarianism is probably the philosophy that best matches Mill’s classic liberalism, and that philosophy is better preserved in the United States than in Mill’s native England. A supremely eloquent essay though. I’ve probably marked more highlights in this book than any other I’ve read.

...more

flag 17 likes · Like · see review

Aug 20, 2014 Luís C. rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: 19th-century, politics, reading-the-world, edicoes-70, favourites, uk-and-related, on-my-own

In the mid-nineteenth century, John Stuart Mill wrote this book defending liberty, with wise words, presenting all the pros and cons devoted to the woman of his country, of which she was a well-known British feminist. He, in turn, was the son of an Anglican pastor. Mill is best known for his work as an economist in which he mixes principles of liberalism with principles of socialism. In the background, today's world all over the West. All the western world studies his work but many people do not ...more

flag 20 likes · Like · see review

Oct 10, 2017 Valdimar rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: politics, philosophy

MILL: the only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way...
ME: Yes. Good
MILL: ...so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it...
ME: Great. Go on. keep em comin
MILL: ..therefore Neoliberalism
ME: No

flag 13 likes · Like · see review

Jun 24, 2011 Capsguy rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: british-irish

It's amazing how it appears as if the older the work, the more relevant it is to today. Sure, this is anything but 'old' in comparison to Socrates and other writers, but this over 150 year old document still serves well today, definitely worth the few hours reading and I recommend it to everyone.

It is logically structured and written with ease of reading and understanding without the sacrifice of the quality of his argument.

As mentioned by Mill, he's not necessarily bringing anything new to the ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Feb 01, 2009 Rosianna rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Not that I agree entirely with Mill's ideas about the structures and general functions of the individual and society, but this was a fascinating insight into the society I live in now, and how I regard my own place in society, if I have one. Most interesting were his points about freedom of expression, and his ability to move from our justifications for freedom of expression to freedom of tastes and pursuits without even flinching. Definitely worth a read, whatever your political persuasion.

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Mar 29, 2019 Tyler rated it liked it · review of another edition

A fundamental text in the Philosophical canon, but we still mustn't overlook the overt imperialism, naivety and intellectualism which seeps throughout these pages...

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Nov 27, 2014 A Man Called Ove rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

4.5/5 I was listening to an interview of Mr.Anupam Kher today on a 'Newslaundry' podcast. The interviewer was questioning him persistently on why he supports restrictions on freedom-of-expression ? I think Mr.Kher (I am a semi-fan of his), gave a number of arguments which were moral and not legal, niceties and not crimes, and failed to distinguish between the 2. This makes me wonder whether even those who suppose themselves to be liberals truly understand the basic reasons behind 4.5/5 I was listening to an interview of Mr.Anupam Kher today on a 'Newslaundry' podcast. The interviewer was questioning him persistently on why he supports restrictions on freedom-of-expression ? I think Mr.Kher (I am a semi-fan of his), gave a number of arguments which were moral and not legal, niceties and not crimes, and failed to distinguish between the 2. This makes me wonder whether even those who suppose themselves to be liberals truly understand the basic reasons behind freedom-of-expression. Speaking of myself, I too dont understand it completely, failing to see what is incitement of violence and what is permissible speech sometimes.
My own thought-process, starting from the point in my early 20s, where I felt that it was an 'elitist' notion, an abstract notion with no benefits to society, when I felt that perhaps MF Hussain deserved some of it. Today, I merely and validly question why he didnt draw his own religion's symbols too ? I would stand by him and condemn those vandalisms/physical attacks on him today.
Freedom-of-expression remained elitist unfortunately even in Ayn Rand's individualism, earning it the scorn of many. Orwell outlined extreme situations and continued to be something impractical and far-off. There are books that rightly talk of it being the root of prosperity but they too provide a partial picture.
In this 150 page book, John Stuart Mill, lays down comprehensive arguments on why freedom-of-expression and liberty is of utmost value, necessity, practical use to the common man. He explores and answers every objection that I have heard so far which is fantastic 160 years after the book was published and shall be so till the end of time. This book should be compulsory reading in schools and colleges.
0.5 has been deducted because the language was tough and dry. A bit like I sometimes read on legal documents. Wish someone writes a lucid version filled with contemporary examples around the world, since it is one of the most important books ever written and few of the most important thoughts ever expressed. Wish it had a little more on economic liberalism. ...more

flag 11 likes · Like · see review

Dec 20, 2009 DJ rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

This book is a classic. Giving due credit, I must acknowledge Prof. Keith Eubanks for inadvertently turning me on to Mill. I think Eubanks once quoted Mill, perhaps in his course syllabus, and I found the quote (something about expecting more from students, and how they will perform to these higher standards given the expecatation and opportunity) intriguing.

Anyway, if you're interested in learning where I get a lot of my thoughts on being an individual, read this book (or read essays/books by ...more

flag 10 likes · Like · see review

Jul 03, 2013 Rosie Nguyễn rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

The book is so great that whenever being asked about it, I'm just speechless, restless, wondering how to give the right word. It's not easy to read, and not easy to make a review. I keep delaying to note my thoughts about it, partly afraid I'm not good enough to comment on such a masterpiece. Yet I try, for my own record, for my later review on this review, and for the future reflection.

On Liberty is an excellent work on human rights and individual's relationship with society. What scores here ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

May 16, 2014 Sean Gabb rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

During the libertarian rebirth of the past generation, it has become fashionable to sneer at the essay On Liberty. It is, I admit, a flawed work, and I will shortly try to explain why this is so. Before then, however, I will put a case for the defence - to show why, despite its flaws, the essay remains a valuable weapon in the libertarian arsenal, and will remain one when Rand and Nozick will chiefly be names found in histories of twentieth century thought.

Mill is at his very best in Chapter II, ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Nov 22, 2016 Jon Nakapalau rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy, classics, favorites

A foundational work addressing representative democracy that continues to shape ideology today. After the 2016 Presidential Election I would strongly suggest both parties hold 'JSM focus groups' to try to reconnect with the American people.

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Dec 08, 2014 Kyle van Oosterum rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy

As the title of this essay suggests, we are dealing with the fundamental social force which when deficient, or when in excess, necessarily provokes chaos; Liberty. Meticulously undertaken, this essay presents the fiercest defence of individualism, captivating the reader with its endorsement of human excellence and self-government. Indeed, Mill's main antagonist is the democratisation of the masses, how we subdue ourselves to the tyranny of public opinion and passively accept mediocrity. Along As the title of this essay suggests, we are dealing with the fundamental social force which when deficient, or when in excess, necessarily provokes chaos; Liberty. Meticulously undertaken, this essay presents the fiercest defence of individualism, captivating the reader with its endorsement of human excellence and self-government. Indeed, Mill's main antagonist is the democratisation of the masses, how we subdue ourselves to the tyranny of public opinion and passively accept mediocrity. Along the way, I couldn't help but feel this striking dissonance triggered by the notion that individuality is a double-edged sword, glistening with the promise of self-actualisation and ensconcing the egotistical neglect, which inevitably results in social elitism. Regardless, Mill's introductory remark is bound to strike your mind with its brevity and cogency:

"Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is SOVEREIGN." - J.S. Mill

Mill carefully, with no hindrance to his writing style, advances libertarian principles left and right, the most prevalent of which is now referred to as the 'Harm Principle.' The Harm Principle basically states the following: "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." It is hardly original, in fact most of us entertain this notion of Liberty consisting of doing whatever we wish without harming others, but Mill's discussion does not end there. The 19th Century did not really house an open society, which explains why Mill's arguments about the freedom of speech and thought might reek of platitudes to the modern reader, but to the contemporary reader, it smacked of anarchy. Mill poetically states that: "Silencing the expression of an opinion is robbing the human race." He defends this eloquently as such: "If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error."

He goes on to delineate the exact limits that authority/society should have over the individual and his objection is really that odds are that when society interferes, it interferes wrongly. At most, a government or authority may only advise or respectfully discourage an individual's behaviour, but never infringe upon their Liberty. Mill also encourages dissent and opposition because they promote human advancement and he laments the 'despotism of custom' dictating our actions and imposing upon the human race a fear of being different. Mill quickly adds: "That so few dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of our time!"

John Stuart Mill was really a trailblazer in philosophical thought, he endorsed universal education, suffrage, gender equality, freedom of speech, the right to divorce and the separation of church and state. Indeed, the Essay is dedicated heartwarmingly to his wife: "Were I but capable of interpreting to the world one half the great thoughts and noble feelings which are buried in her grave, I should be the medium of a greater benefit to it, than is ever likely to arise from anything that I can write, unprompted and unassisted by her all but unrivalled wisdom." The highest recommendation!
...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Jun 20, 2011 Bruce rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Whether or not one is sympathetic toward or convinced by his philosophical positions, Mill’s arguments are always worth listening to. They are inevitably clearly articulated, logically arranged, and elegantly expressed, and their reading is a pleasure as well as an opportunity for mature and considered reflection. This particular work is based on two maxims. First, “the individual is not accountable to society for his actions, in so far as these concern the interests of no person but himself.” ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Sep 12, 2017 Hannah rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: read-for-class, books-i-own

I don't think Mill's ideas are perfect in every single situation, but he makes a convincing argument. In general, I agree with his ideas on the harm principle, individuality, and government. I just think that they break down when taken to the extremes of human behavior that we have seen in various court cases.
I took off a star because holy cow. He uses so many words. Too many words. He could benefit from a copy editor. This would have been easier to follow and made more sense if he had stopped ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Jul 04, 2011 Valerie rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Recommends it for: Ian

Recommended to Valerie by: Stephen

Shelves: because-its-the-right-thing-to-do

I read Stephen's masterful review, and decided I should read this. As an ebook...but it will take me a while. Each densely packed sentence is easily a page long.

I finally finished this, but I think I'll be rereading it. I wonder what life would be like if I tried to run my classroom on these principles?

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Feb 09, 2015 Minh rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy, favorite

I FREAKING LOVE, ADORE, UPHOLD, CHERISH, ADMIRE, REVERE (and other synonyms) THIS GODDAMN AWESOME BOOOOOOOOK!!!!

If after gay marriage legalisation comes book marriage legalisation I would have considered "On Liberty" one of my top suitors ahahahha. Written in 1859 by John Stuart Mill, this philosophical work examines state authority and individualism, and it was so well written that Thomas Hardy once said "All 1860 undergraduates memorised this book by heart." My political view changes so much ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Dec 09, 2017 Matty-Swytla rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction-philosophy, audiobook-2017, non-fiction, classics-uk

AMAZING.

I think Mill's book, and especially his words on free speech, should be given to every student to read and reflect on. I couldn't agree more on the stifling effects of public pressure and blasphemy laws - every idea needs to be evaluated, dissected, and criticised, for it is only in this way that bad ones can be weeded out. People need to think for themselves, to explore, to contemplate, not be moulded into carbon copies of their teachers or relatives, conforming totaly to the majority, ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Feb 09, 2018 Nina Kennett rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: anarcocapitalism

good pts, but i just cant even with the utilitarist arguments.
i owe nada to society, john.

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Apr 22, 2010 Adam rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy, 1800-s

An indisputably great work of philosophy. One, though, whose most valuable insights are too often ignored by today's left-liberals and one that is mentioned with astonishing frequency these days by people who seem to be actively opposed to much that Mill would have thought important--the set of "conservatives" who like to claim that they are "classical liberals," probably on the basis of a quick read through a Wikipedia page and some creepy Randian blogs.

Of course, Millian liberalism actually An indisputably great work of philosophy. One, though, whose most valuable insights are too often ignored by today's left-liberals and one that is mentioned with astonishing frequency these days by people who seem to be actively opposed to much that Mill would have thought important--the set of "conservatives" who like to claim that they are "classical liberals," probably on the basis of a quick read through a Wikipedia page and some creepy Randian blogs.

Of course, Millian liberalism actually shares quite a significant number of characteristics of social liberalism, of welfare liberalism, etc. and in many ways it contains proto-social democratic positions.

There are two that occur to me as ways to account for the strange fate of the British liberal tradition and of thought inspired by Mill specifically, both of which seem valid to me.

One is to suggest that it is deeply worrying and borderline Orwellian that societies built on liberal principles have ignored one of Mill's central points: that a successful liberal culture and society is one that demands real work, real effort, serious engagement on the part of individuals. That it is one that demands diversity of opinion and specifically of learned opinion. Perhaps what we are seeing now is some dystopic world, a realization of what liberalism is doomed to when it keeps its institutions and formal arrangements but ignores the rest of its contents and the government policies that are necessary to produce a populace capable of being good liberals to begin with.

The other, and I am more partial to this way of accounting for the sorry state of things, is to point out--very reasonably, I think--that Mill's profoundly beautiful vision of personal autonomy and freedom extended to all is every bit as utopian and unrealistic a notion as immediate transition to fully automated luxury communism.

The biggest blind spot that Mill had was the same blind spot that other bourgie guys in the 19th century had: they failed to account for the coercive power of the merchant class because they were members of the merchant class. It is not true that Mill was some scheming sly bastard who only ever wanted people exactly like him to have the liberty he describes. His proto-socdem positions show that. But what Mill seems to have failed to realize was that the merchant class and its financialized successors would use its liberty (and make no mistake, that is the class of persons that Mill wants liberty for in any immediate sense) in ways that either intentionally or unintentionally undermine--for the remainder of humans--the very grounds for human flourishing that Mill so prized. The ability of the free human to live her life in a manner chosen by her, not by the state, not by the majority, not by family, not by the church: surely admirable, surely important. But what of influence and power and domination by the very merchant class that 18th and 19th century liberals empowered?

In short and despite how annoying many of the people who say things like this might be, Millian liberalism is insufficient because it creates the basis mostly for the flourishing and independence and creative freedom and meaningful liberty of people like John Stuart Mill.

There are also broader philosophical problems. Is the harm principle unable to account for harm outside of the atomized, small-scale picture according to which liberalism operates theoretically? That is to say: doesn't it fail to account for possible harms to things and persons that don't fit into the category of the liberal subject? Beyond that: if the behaviour of people collectively is beneficial to that group of people and not harmful to other proximate liberal subjects in any immediate sense but is deeply, even catastrophically, harmful to non-humans, to the environment, and to future generations of humans, does the harm principle have anything to offer to counter such destructive behaviour? Is it not insufficient as a restriction on liberty?

Not to say that we throw the baby out with the bathwater and return to fascism and stalinism; the 20th century (not to mention present currents of trumpism, putinism, islamism, etc) is proof enough of how undesirable the actively illiberal is. ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Sep 11, 2016 Sumirti Singaravel rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Recommends it for: To everyone, especially to those who are young.

Shelves: you-need-to-chew-them-bit-by-bit, favorites, to-review-soon, readings-worth-a-lifetime, references, super-favorites, 2016, lights-on-my-coast, winged-words, 6-stars

Never have Liberty found such a passionate, clear, beautiful and eloquent defence. There are few books which has the capacity to instill the faith that written words can change the world, if they are done well, and this is one such book. This should remain as a source of greatest inspiration for all those who want to defend truth and guard their true-selves at all the times. Here is a man who rebels with grace, kindness, and consideration. A book to read to realize how much of freedom we enjoy ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Nov 10, 2007 Doc Opp rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

This is a brilliant book. It should be required reading in every high school in America, and anybody who disagrees with the premises and arguments within should be subject to legal sanction. ;)

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Aug 04, 2017 Stephan rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy

‘On liberty’ by John Stuart Mill is by far the best account I have ever read so far concerning the protection of individual rights. Mill is en exponent of liberty, not of democracy, because democracy is imperfect, whereas liberty is not. Liberty is perfect thus democracy should aspire towards liberty and not vice versa. Many people speak about democracy as if it was liberty, but it is not, and can never be. Democracy is a pragmatic system that attempts liberty. Mill mentions the greatest ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Mar 13, 2011 Marts (Thinker) rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: classics, essays, philosophy, politics-governance, non-fiction

John Stuart Mill's discourse on social liberties regarding the nature of power exercised over an individual within a society, an issues between civil liberty and authority...

I rather appreciate the closing statement of the work:

"A government cannot have too much of the kind of activity which does not impede, but aids and stimulates, individual exertion and development. The mischief begins when, instead of calling forth the activity and powers of individuals and bodies, it substitutes its own ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Apr 17, 2018 Krista rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction

Huzzah! I have finished.

This book took me forever to read. Four months, can you believe that? I can't. A mere 187 pages taking 4 months?! Unbelievable.

I forgive myself somewhat though, because the diction of this book is incredibly dense. The ideas that he is talking about require thought and consideration, so I don't blame myself for taking so long.

I quite enjoyed the book. It's the first time I've read it, and so it was interesting to read the seminal document for the importance of the freedom ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Feb 10, 2017 Daniel Wright rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: great-ideas, old-books, victorian-era, philosophy, classic-philosophy, politics-and-ir

This book is still well worth reading for its still-relevant defense of freedom of speech alone. Some of the later parts let it down slightly, especially on education. But the whole of this book is important for understanding the history behind how liberalism got to be how it is.

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Mental Health and...: Rest for Resistance	1	1	Jul 24, 2019 07:45PM
Freedom to speak your mind.	1	7	Feb 18, 2018 10:48AM
Liberty or Death?	1	5	Jul 31, 2017 02:49PM
Libert or Death?	1	1	Jul 31, 2017 02:48PM
Tyrannicide vs. genocide	1	3	Jun 22, 2017 10:47AM
"... the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community... is to prevent harm to others."	1	11	May 15, 2016 09:04AM

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Philosophy

2,057 users

Politics

690 users

Nonfiction

643 users

Classics

384 users

History

139 users

See top shelves…

About John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill

870 followers

John Stuart Mill, English philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an exponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, although his conception of it was very different from Bentham's.

Books by John Stuart Mill

On Liberty and Other Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought)

More…

Trivia About On Liberty

2 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from عن الحرية

“A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury.” — 339 likes

“He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion... Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them...he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.” — 275 likes

More quotes…

See a Problem?

Preview — الحرية by John Stuart Mill

الحرية

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About John Stuart Mill

Books by John Stuart Mill

Trivia About On Liberty

Quotes from عن الحرية

See a Problem?

Preview — الحرية by John Stuart Mill

الحرية

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About John Stuart Mill

Books by John Stuart Mill

Trivia About On Liberty

Quotes from عن الحرية

new topic
Discuss This Book