George Washington Prize Finalist Winner of the Society of the Cincinnati Prize
“Fascinating… Hinderaker’s meticulous research shows that the Boston Massacre was contested from the beginning… [Its] meanings have plenty to tell us about America’s identity, past and present.” ― Wall Street Journal
On the night of March 5, 1770, British soldiers fired into a crowd gathered in front of Boston’s Custom House, killing five people. Denounced as an act of unprovoked violence and villainy, the event that came to be known as the Boston Massacre is one of the most famous and least understood incidents in American history. Eric Hinderaker revisits this dramatic confrontation, examining in forensic detail the facts of that fateful night, the competing narratives that molded public perceptions at the time, and the long campaign to transform the tragedy into a touchstone of American identity.
“Hinderaker brilliantly unpacks the creation of competing narratives around a traumatic and confusing episode of violence. With deft insight, careful research, and lucid writing, he shows how the bloodshed in one Boston street became pivotal to making and remembering a revolution that created a nation.” ―Alan Taylor, author of American Revolutions
“Seldom does a book appear that compels its readers to rethink a signal event in American history. It’s even rarer…to accomplish so formidable a feat in prose of sparkling clarity and grace. Boston’s Massacre is a gem.” ―Fred Anderson, author of Crucible of War
Terrific! Hinderaker evaluates all the eyewitness and news reports at the time for validity and his recounting and analysis is exhaustive! He follows threads that I know drove some reviewers crazy, but his obsessive impulse pays off. He shows how these sometimes conflicting views were used by to created a narrative
Fantastic book for the upcoming 250th Anniversary of the Massacre. Great synopsis of some of the classic works over the years, setting the wider narrative very effectively. Joseph Warren gets some updated coverage, mostly referencing a solid biography from 1961.
My feelings are mixed. I bought the book in a trip to Boston, knowing close to zero not only for the Boston Massacre but more in general for the American history during this period.
The book is a strange melange of event description, presentation of testimonies, a display of the historical context before and after bringing a short parallelism with much later events and their possible interconnection.
Have I learned anything reading the book? Yes. At the same time though, I felt sometimes lost in conflicting testimonies, more like a judge or a member of a jury, trying to make sense and mentally rebuild the event myself. Did I get bored reading it? No. However, I did not get excited either. The book does offer the reader a view, trying to be fair and moderate, of the event, but it enters a tad too much into very many details, for my liking at least.
«The troops arrived in Boston not in response to a crisis but anticipating the possibility of one ».
« A motley rabble of saucy boys, negroes and molattoes, Irish teagues and out landish jack tarrs - it captures a widely held understanding of Boston’s composition ».
« As a symbol, the Boston Massacre refuses to resolve itself. Instead it asks us to define, over and over again, the limits of legitimate authority, and to place them in the balance against the limits of legitimate popular protest. »
This book looked at the circumstances surrounding the Boston Massacre - before / during / and after - more so than the actual event. The trials of the soldiers months later largely ended in acquittals for the soldiers - leaving an impression that this was mob violence gone wrong. The author then transitions to more modern versions of soldier / police violence with the Kent State anti-Vietnam war killings / the Jackson State shootings / civil rights demonstrators who were killed / to police violence against blacks / to Black Lives Matter. With the successful war against Britain in the American Revolution, the Boston Massacre has significantly faded from view - or has it? Crispus Attucks, the first person to die in the Boston Massacre was of partial African descent, and set the stage for comparisons to our times.
This book is a history of the Boston Massacre, which was one of the events that led up to the American Revolution. The author begins by providing a history of Boston during the period. I was interested to learn Boston was struggling economically at the time, and losing market share to other port cities. The author explains how Boston's hinterland was not very good agricultural land, and land taxes were bankrupting the Boston elite. The author also compares the situation in Boston to other colonial areas at the time, which I found very interesting. After describing the massacre and its aftermath (the trial in which the accused British soldiers were defended by John Adams), the author discusses its place in popular culture. Overall, the book was well-written and enlightening.
Very good analysis of how the atmosphere in Boston and the residents' relationship Great Britain soured culminating with the shooting of a crowd by soldiers of the 29th Regiment on the night of March 5, 1770.
More academic than I expected but overall it was interesting to see how both sides explained and justified their actions along with the battle to set history straight with what actually happened that night.
A fascinating book documenting the geo-political climate that led to this infamous event. Painstakingly researched, Hindraker admirably deconstructs the economic and political forces that fomented the affair and their significance in the early days of the American revolution. From a neutral perspective, Hindraker presciently sheds light on the reality of over-arching political tensions that often catch common people in the middle of tense, often violent, political endeavors.
This was a good read. The author scours the details of the event of March 5, 1770 and illustrated how a story can be bent and twisted to the will of the story teller and reframed and respun to support one’s political biases even hundreds of years on.
the way that i never logged this book lol! i read it for my american revolution history class (of course). it's alright. just alright. very three stars. can't be mad at it.