Really 3.5 stars.
This is a tough one. I find that I have no problem reviewing books that I love and no problem reviewing books that I hate. Books that don't push me in either direction, however--that simply produce a "Meh"--are much more difficult to write about.
Such is Exorcist Falls: it's not a bad book, and not a good book. I suspect it will be easier for me to review this if try to categorize the good and the bad, so here goes.
WHAT WORKED:
1) The opening novella was fantastic! Even though it wore its influences (and I use that term loosely, because basically what we have here is a rewriting of The Exorcist) on its sleeve, it was atmospheric, tense, and something I could not stop reading. If the end of Exorcist Road had been the end of the story, it would have been 5 stars. It was, in my opinion, perfect.
2) The secondary priests. Both Father Sutherland and Father Patterson were exceptional characters. Sutherland is warm and knowledgeable, while Patterson's character development was the best of the book....until the end, that is, when he takes a turn for the not-very-believable. In fact, most of the secondary characters in both sections were well-written and enjoyable, even the nasty ones.
2a) One quibble: the female characters were pretty one-dimensional overall.
3) The fact that this was not about vampires, werewolves, witches, zombies, or supernatural love triangles. I really appreciated that Janz was going for something more original (or at least different) in this novel.
4) I also LOVED that evil was evil and not just misunderstood or mistreated or lashing out after being bullied. The bad guys, both human and not, were truly bad and very clever.
WHAT DID NOT WORK:
1) Father Crowder. Hooooly cow, was this a terrible guy. Whiny, self-pitying, completely uninteresting, and not even flawed enough to make a good antihero, he is not a successful central character. If I had to read one more sentence about how much he loved women even though he was a priest, or how he always felt like a wimpy loser, or always WAS a wimpy loser, I might have lost my mind.
2) The tone of the second half was VERY different from that of the first. No one would be fooled into thinking they were written at the same time. In fact, at times the characters seemed like different people who just happened to have the same name. Liz, who barely appears in Exorcist Road, is secretly investigating the Sweet Sixteen Killer in Exorcist Falls? Huh? (And what purpose did that particular plot device serve, anyway? Maybe it was an attempt to deal with 2a above?)
3) The biggest issue for me was the continuous shift in writing style. Sometimes characters spoke and thought in completely normal, down-to-earth ways; at other times, they seemed to be trying to best Bulwer-Lytton for purpleness of prose. For example,
"My body spasmed, racked with peristaltic waves of geysering crimson,"
is an actual sentence in this book. As is,
"To say there's been an upheaval would be to trivialize the scope of your difficulties."
This mouthful is spoken by our good friend Father Crowder, who is in fact a human and not a shape-shifting alien or Star Trek android, during a conversation in which he is supposedly trying to express sympathy and empathy toward a woman he allegedly loves. It's as if every character occasionally turns into the Valeyard (Google "There's nothing you can do to prevent the catharsis of spurious morality!") and their speech patterns shift accordingly.
4) There are some repetitive things that are strange and distracting. Crowder, when eyeballing all of the women he desperately wants, frequently refers to the "mounds" of the female body. The trope of the "lustful priest/nun" was omnipresent in this book; every person of the cloth wanted every other person of the cloth and talked about it unceasingly. Also (minor spoiler), multiple characters have their eyes gouged out as they die. This was just weird.
5) The ending, which I suspect was meant to be shocking and pessimistic in a 70s horror flick kind of way, didn't really do much for me. In fact, it would have been more of a surprise if it hadn't happened.
5a) Likewise, the big reveal as to why the Sweet Sixteen Killer kills was pretty underwhelming.
Overall, I enjoyed this book. It's a quick, fun read. I'm certainly glad to have discovered Janz and will definitely seek out more that he wrote. I don't know if Exorcist Falls will be a memorable book for me, but I'm glad to have read it.
And, hey! It's my first time to say:
************
I received a free e-copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. This is it.
************