I didn't find this book until a few months after I had completed a trip to Michigan and had visited a few of these locations. Would have been nice to have had it on the trip with me.
The book is organized well and there's a nice map provided at the front of the book. Some of the pictures are good, but others don't work well in a black/white format.
I don't believe in ghosts but do enjoy history and a good ghost story. The majority of the ghost stories in this book were NOT good. The author really stretches to find stories to fit her narrative and many of the stories appear to be made up by the author herself.
She has done some valid research and many of the lighthouses she writes about she could find stories of who the lightkeepers were and how they or their family members died. That information was interesting. However, she forces these deaths to fit with any mention of suspicious ghost-like activity. Someone heard footsteps? It conveniently HAS to be the ghost of the one lightkeeper she had information about from that location! If the author found no deaths at the lighthouse, she then would find a nearby shipwreck or basically any other death in the area whether it was related to the lighthouse or not.
One lighthouse had the ghost of a boy named Jesse but the only death of a lightkeeper's child the author could find there was of a little girl named Cecilia. After throwing out some other silly theories, the author eventually states the factual information she found in her research must be wrong! hahahaha
One lighthouse she mentioned had zero reports of paranormal activity but a clairvoyant visited in the 1990s and said there was a spirit of a girl there. The author found a story of a little girl being killed by a bear a few miles away in the 1940s and said that HAD to be who was haunting the lighthouse. Because the little girl HAD to have visited the lighthouse at some point and it made an impression on her which is why her spirit stayed. Quite a stretch.
The most horrifying example was a lighthouse where the author insists on spreading a ridiculous theory that one of the female lightkeepers was a black widow who murdered both of her husbands. Her only "proof" is that the woman had two dead husbands (as if that wasn't a fairly normal occurrence in the 1800s). No motive other than the woman must have been upset that she didn't get to keep the post of lightkeeper after she remarried. But the author says about her black widow theory that "you can't help but wonder". I disagree. Her disgusting theory is downright insulting. I can't imagine what the descendants of that woman would think about this "theory".
This is not the best book for someone interested in the actual history of the area. I have a degree in history and know how to properly research a topic. The author does not. Her degree was focused on journalism and broadcasting. We all know how journalism has moved away from the integrity and fact checking of Woodward and Bernstein to the promotion of propaganda, lies and misinformation all in the name of entertainment. The truth is too boring and does not sell.
ALL of the author's resources are internet websites and she adds a note at the end justifying the stories she invented by stating that "the details are not always consistent" but since ghost stories are "subjective" they may not be considered "factual by all individuals". Wow, seriously? Admit you made things up and then basically say "tee hee it's ok cuz haters gonna hate". Gross.
I also find it incredibly inappropriate for the author to be able to rate her own book with five stars. Not cool. Why is this allowed?