Bolest se promenila tokom poslednjh pedeset godina, u periodu tranzicije iz modernog u postmoderno doba. Razboljevamo se od nepoznatih bolesti, podvrgavamo se nezamislivim tretmanima, umiremo na uznemiravajuće nove načine i na novim mestima. Postmoderna bolest, tvrdi autor, nezaobilazna je u analiziranju savremenog doba isto kao i filmovi, automobili, kompjuteri i svemirske letelice.
Glavni cilj ovog štiva je promišljanje i integrisanje rasute manjinske tradicije, u kojoj se razmatra značaj kulturoloških uticaja na zdravlje i bolest. Mnogi čitaoci će prepoznati doprinos istaknutih mislilaca unutar ove tradicije, kao što su Rene Dibua, Džordž L. Engel, Oliver Saks, Melvin Koner, Artur Klajnman i (pre svih) Mišel Fuko. Shvatanje bolesti kao biokulturne pojave, što je i tema ove knjige, prolazi dug put osvetljavanja promena, sukoba i zbrka u postmodernoj medicini.
Morris' thoughts on illness linked to culture falls short on a newly developed understanding of social perceptions of illness, though makes up for it in a detailed understanding of modern vs postmodern illness.
In an era of a global pandemic, this text has something valuable to say! David Morris uses a broad array of culture and science to argue for a biocultural approach to science. I gave this book 3 stars simply because much of the information in this particular edition is dated. In many ways, the medical professions have adopted more and more of a bicultural approach to medicine. However, the dated nature of some of this book also speaks volumes to Morris' prophetic voice. For example, far less people die in the sterile arena of a hospital these days, instead opting to live out their final day in control over there own narrative.
For many, I don't think reading this entire book is necessary but if interested, the following chapters are essential reading: Chapter 1"The Country of the Ill" Chapter 4: Reinventing Pain Chapter 7: The Plot of Suffering Chapter 8: Illness in the time of Disney.
Many years later this is a solid read but I would love to read something newer that challenges the biomedical model.
With its emphasis on temporality and historical specificity in illness definitions and experiences, I can see why so many later anthropological and sociological accounts of illness and pain drew on Morris. But I'll admit the short chapter on "the obscene" felt like a digression, never fully connected to illness as potentially obscene or revealing of the obscene. And Morris's ending on "narrative bioethics" and active listening from practitioners as a means of overcoming the alienation and fragmentation of postmodern illness betrays his background as a literature professor, much weaker than the criticisms and recommendations he could have lodged against medical, political, and economic institutions structuring patients' illnesses.
Na trenutke vrlo inkoherentna i neusredsređena knjiga u kojoj se čini da je glavna tema Endi Vorhol a ne nauka i bolesti. Bilo kako bilo, ova knjiga predstavlja kontroverznu ideju da je bolest u današnjem dobu rezultat kako bioloških tako i društvenih faktora, samo što je ta ideja predstavljena na konfuzan način uz mnogo nepovezanih delova i učestalo spominjanje Endija Vorhola koje u većini slučajeva deluje besmisleno. Fridrih Niče se takođe više puta pominje, ali krajnje površno, iako mislim da je njegov život mogao poslužiti kao mnogo bolji primer nekih ideja o bolesti.