I'm trying to like this book, I really am, because I think that there are a lot of useful and inspiring philosophies I can pick up that will greatly benefit me in my decluttering journey. However, I was only one chapter in when I couldn't get past the observation that the author was probably trying to write in a "quirky" and relatable manner at the expense of potentially being offensive.
Only 37 pages in and there are already three mentions of Marie Kondo and how her method does not work for the author. I get that Marie Kondo's sensationalized decluttering philosophies don't work for a lot of people, but as an author trying to write something authentically helpful, I don't see a need to take jabs at your fellow peers and feel that she could have gotten her point across effectively without needing to put others down.
Another thing that stuck out like a sore thumb to me was on page 20, under the header "Feng what now?", she expounds on being "eye-rollingly sceptical of the idea that a pot plant in a certain corner wards off conflict, or that keeping the loo seat down prevents riches pouring away". I get it. These idealogies seem like superstitions to many, but are actually widely practiced beliefs in Chinese culture. I personally do not practice Feng Shui, but felt that this entire paragraph (which was used to later highlight the usefulness of one particular Feng Shui philosophy of decluttering as "making perfect sense to her"), was really lacking in tact and respect. For a self-help author, I'd think that she would be more aware about not making cheap passes at other cultures - and again, her point could definitely be put across effectively even without that weird anecdotal jab. What may be an eye-roll to you, is a firmly held belief system to someone else that you shouldn't be cherry-picking from.
This is just one of MANY examples of the author adopting a "relatable", "quirky" tone in this book to elaborate on her ideas, which often borders on insulting something or sometimes even the reader themselves. It's a bummer, because when she's not trying to be funny, the book has a lot of substance that I could actually takeaway. But because of the observations I've mentioned, it's not something I'm likely to recommend to others.