What do you think?


Bruce Springsteen: The Rolling Stone Files
The Rolling Stone Files is the ultimate collection of articles, facts, and opinions spanning Bruce Springsteen's entire history, featuring interviews, thoughts, and reflections from the Boss in his own words. The book is part biography, part autobiography, part insightful rock history--an incredible tribute to the Everyman of rock, one of its most beloved and enduring icons.
- GenresMusicNonfiction
353 pages, Paperback
First published October 1, 1996
About the author
Rolling Stone Magazine
862 books39 followersRolling Stone is a U.S.-based magazine devoted to music, politics, and popular culture that is published every two weeks. Rolling Stone was founded in San Francisco in 1967 by Jann Wenner (who is still editor and publisher) and music critic Ralph J. Gleason.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
May 11, 2009
Some of the stuff in here is filler, but the album reviews, interviews, and essays are great. Rolling Stone is obviously a fan of the Boss.
April 2, 2023
As a lifelong Springsteen fan and a long-time Rolling Stone reader I had read almost all of the material in this book (except for some of the very early articles). So it didn't present new information to me but it was interesting how it re-contextualized some things given the ability to look backward.
The most interesting thing to me what how prescient some of the authors were in evaluating what direction Springsteen might (and did) take.
If you're a big Springsteen fan (and especially if you have not read this Rolling Stone material before) you would enjoy it.
The most interesting thing to me what how prescient some of the authors were in evaluating what direction Springsteen might (and did) take.
If you're a big Springsteen fan (and especially if you have not read this Rolling Stone material before) you would enjoy it.
February 26, 2008
Interesting for completists. But since it is just rolling stone articles they spend a lot of time perpetuating the same age old mythology from month to month. But Rolling Stone never fully acknowledges the fact that Time and Newsweek caught on to the Springsteen buzz long before they did.
November 18, 2015
some really good, lengthy, interviews.....
September 21, 2009
10 subject; 6 writing
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews




