What do you think?
Rate this book


224 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1999
Salmon, who spend most of their lives hidden from us in the vast oceans, return to us to instruct us and feed us. They focus our attention on some of the smaller increments of our natural world—the streams that run through our rural homes or beneath our urban structures—at the same time as they instruct us regarding the indivisible relationship of one locale to another and the life lessons to be learned from other species. (199)
It doesn’t take an expert in the manipulation of statistics to understand that the survival of the entire human species depends on a sustainable relationship to the local expression of the processes of the biosphere. From everything one can learn through the nearly impenetrable veil of modern history, prehistoric humans acted out this latter assumption for most of our species’ time on Earth. The very roots of the word indigenous mean “of a place.” But the seductive social mechanics of the relatively recent Industrial Revolution have been so successful that even as we humans have exhausted our sources of sustenance, we have convinced ourselves that there is no other way to act. We have engaged in a process of purposeful and systematic forgetting; we have lost previous models of a more elegantly balanced life among humans, and we have convinced each other that it is fruitlessly utopian to imagine any other way of life. (49)
As an adjective, the word wild is used so indiscriminately as to muddle our thinking. Wild youth. Wild hair. Wild beast. But if the word is fastidiously defined to describe a homeostatic, self-organized relationship that does not require management from outside itself, then it can provide us with a meditation large enough to occupy a lifetime. By this definition our breath is wild. Our heartbeat is wild. Our digestive systems are wild, made up as they are of multiple organism largely defined by their mutual function. Any cubic foot of healthy soil is a relational cell of the wild of such complexity as to define rational analysis. By engaging the health of another species, by engaging salmon as an expression of our own survival, could we turn ourselves and our neighbors in the direction of a wilder, self-organizing relationship to each other and to the world close at hand? (133–4)
After ten thousand years of a different set of relationships between people and place, the reconstructed landscape with its purely economic rationale [has] become the only context in which human social organization could imagine itself. (141)
Consensus needs to be understood as the practice of community-building in the context of living places. Its appropriate analog is not politics but the processes of natural succession. It is an ongoing collective meditation that allows for conflicting ideologies to gradually be dissolved by a growing sense of mutuality. (200)
When we begin to focus on what might be right—the appropriate contexts, scales, and economies in which human communities might immerse themselves in local expressions of the planet—we find ourselves creating new language. As a species, we have become a population of refugees, longing for homes we remember only faintly, as we remember dreams. The process of reconstructing and immersing ourselves in our own specific places at times resembles the effort to recreate the memory of a victim of amnesia. (213)
To a certain degree (and it is a measure of our intelligence to be aware to what degree), the indicator of our success is not the avoidance of co-optation but to have designed strategies that cannot be co-opted without a fundamental change on the part of the larger socioeconomic system. (214)