The Bible in its The Bible and archaeology Kenneth A. The Bible in its The Bible and archaeology Paternoster FIRST First Edition, First Printing. Published by Paternoster Press, 1977. Octavo. Paperback. Book is very good.Seller 540933 Philosophy & Psychology We Buy Books! Collections - Libraries - Estates - Individual Titles. Message us if you have books to sell!
Kenneth Anderson Kitchen was a British biblical scholar, Ancient Near Eastern historian, and Personal and Brunner Professor Emeritus of Egyptology and honorary research fellow at the School of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, England. He specialised in the ancient Egyptian Ramesside Period (i.e., Dynasties 19-20), and the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt, as well as ancient Egyptian chronology, having written over 250 books and journal articles on these and other subjects since the mid-1950s. He has been described by The Times as "the very architect of Egyptian chronology".
I found this to be very readable, even when Kitchen was technical in his explanations he was clear enough for the layperson to follow the general discussion and argument. A greater knowledge with and facility with the time period and ancient languages would be a boon, but the deficit didn't hinder my enjoyment as much as, perhaps, my greater understanding.
In his concluding statements, Kitchen himself said what I was thinking about the book overall:
"If in the course of a fair and full investigation of the total available resources, the verdict is frequently a high measure of agreement between the Bible and the world that is its ancient and original context, then this result should not be specially prized or despised, but used quietly and sanely to gain a good understanding of both. When problems arise (as they do in all fields of study, without exception), usually from incomplete or defective information, then they should be treated alike in all cases (biblical and otherwise) -- critically, sympathetically, thoroughly, drawing only provisional conclusions when lack of data makes final ones impracticable. The biblical world has yet much treasure to yield to us in times to come ..., yet in human experience, none to be compared with the Bible itself." pg 134
Recommended to me by my now Pastor-Emeritus and also a Professor Emeritus of History and Near Eastern Languages at Ohio State, I add my enthusiastic approval. If only I could read my pastor's annotations LOL
So far, this is one of my favorites on biblical archaeology. It ranks up there with James B. Pritchard's Archaeology And The Old Testament. Kitchen is more thorough and goes deeper than Pritchard, and so each has charm in its own right. Kitchen gives me more in depth insights into some of the struggles of Archaeologists to agree on their findings along with a little more guidance on how to sort this out. He also gives more in depth information on the various archaeological finds. He is better sourced than Pritchard, but Prichard is a little more fun to read.
Kitchen demonstrates a genuine command of his subject giving the reader a cogent survey of the ancient near east while providing clear context for both the Old and New Testaments. Certainly, his focus is on explicating the the Hebrew Scripture in its historical and cultural setting, in in so doing he establishes the credibility of both New and Old. He also handily deals with the eighteenth century biblical scholarly bias which assumed much on little to no evidence.
As long as you have the capacity for assimilating and assessing evidence, and regardless of your disposition toward Judaism, Christianity or their foundational texts, Kitchen is worth reading.
If you want to understand the limitations of archaeology and the forces that destroy so much physical evidence that remained from ancient times, this is the book to read. The first chapter basically lays it all out in how an excavation is not even touching more than a drop in the bucket about the past.
Mr. Kitchen never achieved his doctorate yet was able to become a very respected Egyptologist who proved the price mentioned for Joseph given by the slave traders was true. His works are worth reading if you can afford them.
A challenging read for someone like myself who has had almost no exposure to the topic, but a very valuable one. Despite the fact that there have been decades more research and discoveries since publishing, this book was very valuable in learning about the methods used by archeologists and other experts who study the ancient worlds of the Bible.
I'd like to see an updated version, but there is still a lot of timeless information here regarding not just the ways scholars study the ancient world, but also how we should approach and evaluate their findings in light of God's word.
Definitely worth reading. It is also much smaller than On the Reliability of the Old Testament, so it doesn't entail nearly the same investment of time.