I picked up this book because I really enjoyed all 4 books in the authors Lovely Lane series and was hoping since this seemed to be set in the same time period it would be similar.
I'll start with the positives but there are only a few. I seem to have picked up quite a few books set in the 40s and 50s lately, as someone who couldn't even tell you whether they live next to a single person or a family, it's intriguing to read about such strong bonds within and community and to see how they all pull together and help each other out. As a peek into a different time and culture this book ticks all the boxes. Unfortunately here is where it all starts to fall apart.
The first problem is the time frame, it's not clear how long of a time period this book is supposed to cover. There is a 2 year time period from the point where we are introduced to Alice's character and when her role in the story really starts. But then that's followed by a mention of the child being in nappies to jumping to mentions of school. There is no clear indication of the differences in ages between Kitty and Nellie, but it's mentioned near the end that Kitty is 14 and they appear to both be caring for the other kids. There are no mentions of any big events like birthdays or Christmas to help explain.
This book was released before the Lovely Lane series and even knowing that it's jarring to see character names you have seen mentioned in the other books but with different personalities and stories and whether the characters names being the same is intentional or not, did the author change her mind about the characters stories or is it just coincidence she used the same names? In fairness it does seem like even in the Lovely Lane series the author just doesn't have a great idea of who she wants her characters to be. A good example of my point is Nurse Antrobus, we are introduced to her briefly midway through the book, when she smacks a panicking child and uses a fairly rude phrase "bogjumper" to describe her because her family is Irish. In the Lovely Lane books, Sister Antrobus features at some point in all 4 books. Pink uniforms are described in this book but it's not clear if she is wearing one or not, but assuming that since this book description says 1950s and the first Lovely Lane book says 1953 it's a little bit hard to credit her going from unprofessional potential probationer nurse to sister that everyone is terrified of in 3 years. But it would be easier to overlook this if not for Maura and Tommy. In this book they apparently have 7 children, but in the Lovely Lane book 4 the characters with the same name appear to have 4 and they seem to be a lot younger.
But for me, the biggest problem comes down to the writing itself. Not trying to spoil anything but having a ghost character, without really exploiting the angle seems like a waste. I'm not religious but I could understand a character based in the superstitions of a religious community, even just the feeling that the person they love hasn't really left them, but instead we seem to have almost a cartoon character with no substance. The character is described at the beginning as being someone people couldn't help loving yet somehow this lingering spirit doesn't radiate love or compassion just gets thrown in when the author feels like it with no real consistency or reason to do it. She's not really the only character who doesn't seem like they need to be included or at least would have been better included in a different way.
You can almost excuse the fairly graphic descriptions in Lovely Lane, it's set in a hospital and community in the 1950s around a community that still faces things including signs saying No Irish, you don't go into it expecting to read about unicorns and rainbows. But this book, is about life in a community, I expected harsh realities and even some things that made me uncomfortable, but I wasn't prepared for graphic descriptions of abuse that made me wonder how any child made it through the 1950s. I can't help thinking that if the author favoured graphic details so much they might have been better used describing the punishment rather than the crime. This is not a book for anyone with young children, especially not the audiobook, and it left me with tears on my face and a slight lingering degree of paranoia about ever trusting anyone to be alone with my kids. As much as I would like to know how the story continues in the other 2 books in the series, I don't feel like it's something I can tackle any time soon.