Very interesting book.
The meaning of The Fool made me think of the character Hamlet. Shakespeare's character plays the mad man, the jester, during the whole play and at the same time is able to see a truth nobody else can. He feels something he cannot quite put into words: ''And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?''. Also the Hebrew letter for the Fool, Aleph, is a silent letter; ''the rest is silence'' being Hamlet's last words. Rest, in music, meaning an interval of silence between notes.
I could add to it next to Hamlet, Ibsen's dreamer, Peer Gynt.
Another interesting thing about The Fool, his limitations, is Pollack saying he is a necessary stage everyone passes but one in which we cannot stay forever, otherwise in this state of nothingness we would never change and therefore never acquire wisdom. Wilhelm Stekel, an austrian psychiatrist, in a book I read recently, states that in order that we go on in life psychologicaly healthy we must let our infantile needs and urges behind us, he understands many neuroses as forms of infantile fixations, things that bar our maturing. There's a similar thought in the Bible: ''When I was a child, I used to speak like a child, think like a child, reason like a child; when I became a man, I did away with childish things.''
The journey through the Major Arcana is a journey of learning to speak, writes Pollack. So as Fools, like children and poets, we babble, babble not the truth, we babble at the brink of it, because only as sensible observers we aren't truly living.
Zero is Fool's number or position. The number '0' bears the egg shape, as the origin of something yet undefined. That idea reminded me of a machine in a japanese anime relating the existence of God to the concept of zero in mathematics, saying that zero ''it's a symbol that denies the absence of meaning, the meaning that's necessitated by the delineation of one system from another. In analog, that's God. In digital, it's zero.''
I think I gonna go mad reading and thinking about those relations.