The one great megatrend of the new millennium. In this important and timely book encompassing the key trends of our time, John Naisbitt, the world's foremost social forecaster and bestselling author, takes us on a compelling and kaleidoscopic tour of our contemporary 'technology immersion' and our accelerated search for meaning. High Tech/High Touch shows how we need to understand technology through a human lens - to comprehend life-science technologies through theology, consumer technology through high-touch time, science of the body through art. Exploring everything from the effect of consumer and genetic technologies (the most influential of all technologies to come) to the problems that parents face contending with violent electronic games, the authors' insights span science, religion, commerce, communications, art, leisure and many other areas of our daily lives.
Liked the book and suggestions, oddly enough this was recommended by a friend who talks the talk but does not walk the walk. The tips are only good if you actually do them.
185 pages of unadulterated techno-pessimism lamenting how techology is ruining the world. Of course dated by now, and without providing any solutions short of throwing away all your tech and going living in a cabin in the woods. The redeeming feature that saves this diatribe from one star is the last chapter on how modern artworks use and comment on technology. The interesting concept of high tech/high touch was apparently exhausted in Naisbitt's "Megatrends." Not recommended.
buku ini meceritakan tentang kemajuan teknologi khususnya IT yang mempengaruhi sosial budaya di Amerika. Naisbit menyatakan ada korelasi antara film-film kekerasan dan game yang berbau kekerasan terhadap serangkaian tragedi pembunuhan massal oleh anak2 dan orang dewasa di Amerika. bisa jadi tragedi virginia tech yang lalu juga ada kaitan dengan uraian nasibit ini. Naisbit menggugat industri televisi bertanggung jawab terhadap kerusakan moral yang cenderung pada kekerasan. di Indonesia sendiri gejala tersebut ada. mungkin kita tinggal menunggu rentetan tragedi saja :(. atau sudah sering terjadi?
This book is terrible. I strongly recommend against reading it. I was unable to get through the whole book.
The work is disorganized, written in a random organization. It doesn't make clear what its points are. It makes various aggrandized claims of problems with limited evidence, and even less explanations what to change.
The book includes lots of anecdotes from a range of people. It fails to clearly tie them to a narrative, to put them into context. Even the good anecdotes are often put into a context that implies they are very scary without any justification.
When I was fed up I tried to skip to the end to find conclusions, but those that exist are spread out and hard to find.