This introduction to philosophy in the Latin West between 1150 and 1350 follows on from John Marenbon's previous book, Early Medieval Philosophy 480-1150 (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983). It combines an historical approach, which concentrates on the sources, forms and backgrounds of the medieval works, with philosophical analysis of thirteenth- and fourteenth-century writing in terms comprehensible to a modern reader. Marenbon believes that it is only through this conlbination of approaches that a satisfactory understanding of the subject can be reached. Part I provides the reader with the most important information needed in order to be able to understand medieval thinkers' arguments in their intellectual and historical context. It examines the structure of courses in the medieval universities; the methods of teaching; the forms of written work; the logical techniques used for argument and analysis; the translation and availability of Ancient Greek, Arab and Jewish philosophical texts; the challenges the new material presented and the various ways in which western thinkers responded to them. Part II examines in detail one particular, important problem in later medieval thought: the nature of intellectual knowledge. It explains the arguments given by Aristotle, his antique commentators and the Arab philosophers Avicenna and Averroes, and then traces - in terms accessible to the modern philosopher - how a series of Western thinkers developed, modified or rejected them: William of Auvergne, Thomas Aquinas, Martin and Boethius of Dacia, Radulphus Brito, Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus and William of Ockham.
I read this as a follow-up to Marenbon's book Early Medieval Philosophy 480-1150, which I liked. This book looks mainly at the way Medieval philosophers grappled with the the mind, human identity, and the particulars of human thought. The author takes a historical critical approach to these philosophers to highlight the distinction between between modern philosophy and the Scholastic version.
He stresses that readers must take into account the fact that these philosophers were usually also theologians, and the implications of this make it tricky to draw inviting parallels between the ideas of modern epistemology and earlier elucidations. Medieval philosophy, for example, sought to account not just for the mental processes of man, but also those of God, angels, the dead, and other disembodied spirits.
This book describes in its first section the structure of medieval education, in which the theologian was the de facto PhD, and goes into some detail about the ideas of individual philosophers, showing how their standing within the university systems affected the philosophy they pursued. This detail Marenbon goes into in an interesting way, and in such a way that most interested readers will be able to follow the details. I recommend both his books to anyone curious about the state of Western philosophy starting in the Dark Ages and running to early modern times.
Marenbon (Cambridge) is a real expert in medieval philosophy and I found this introduction to the high period extremely helpful. In the first half he sheds reams of light into the medieval university system, how exactly the theologians & philosophers were trained and what their methodologies, authorities & presuppositions were. The stuff on technique and innovation in medieval logic was especially illuminating. Then in the second half he zooms in on one subject (mental cognition, knowledge & memory) and traces its development from Aristotle, Avicenna & Averroes to William of Auxerre, Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus & Ockham. I learnt a lot about subjects that had hitherto perplexed me!