This was an interesting book of blurbs from Pope Francis. Some parts were particularly interesting like how the faithful need to accept women in their homes and the church in more ways than just roles of servitude. It was nice to read that.
My favorite part, though, is the idea that Christians need to be courageous and fight, but not necessarily to win. His position was that witnessing should not be synonymous with imposing.
I really latched onto this, this idea of witnessing the way the Pope means.
As a kid - probably 14 or 15 - I went through a radical reformation. I got swept up by the pretty neighbor’s Baptist church where I went three times a week. I got rid of all my CDs and stopped watching my favorite shows.
And I proselytized like you wouldn’t believe. Nobody was safe. I’d bring my bible to school and read highlighted passages between classes and ask EVERYONE if they had found their lord and savior Jesus Christ yet.
I was insufferable. Even my dad told me to shut the hell up about God.
And, when the church asked if any kids wanted to volunteer to bang on doors, I raised my hand. I got dressed up and, on a Saturday morning, went knocking.
Zero people were stoked to see me and 100% of them were unfriendly toward me.
But my church said this wasn’t just the way, but the BEST way and what I was required to do per the scripture.
Eventually the girl moved away and some stuff happened at the church that really took the shine off the whole endeavor. I’ve always been a logical guy and I remember the day we had a special meeting where they flew in specialists who taught the congregation how to convert Jews to the RIGHT religion, and it was here that I began to have doubts.
Eventually I settled into the “spiritual but not religious” sect.
Then more stuff happened, more thoughts occurred, and I decided I couldn’t believe in God. At least not an active God. I might be able to get behind the clockmaker idea where God made the universe and then disappeared to focus on whatever else he was doing, but that’s as far as I can go. The idea of an active God like my conservative, mostly republican friends talk about - where all of this dumpster fire of a world is part of his grand plan… that seems unlikely.
Or, if not unlikely, something I actively don’t want to be a part of. The jealous, spiteful god these people talk about sounds a lot like an abusive spouse.
I don’t say that to inspire potential converters. I’m just laying it out there that I’m not big into the idea of an active God who sees all of this and is okay with it. Who has followers that are actively going against the book he co-authored and is letting them slide, even if it means they’re destroying the world and hurting his so-called beloved children.
I just can’t do it.
That said, in college, I met a guy named Buck. Buck was awesome. He was (probably still is) a super friendly guy who always had kind words to share and would always - ALWAYS - help you with whatever you need. If you needed a table moved, he would help. If you needed someone to vent to about work, he was there.
The dude was awesome.
And he gave off this super positive energy. The guy was a vibe and a half. Hanging out with him, I’d leave feeling better about myself, but I’d also be reevaluating my own potential as a person. I wanted to be more like Buck.
And Buck was a man of faith.
He NEVER talked about it, though. He didn’t witness like I had as a kid. He was just Buck and you wanted to get closer to him and find out what made him such a cool, chill guy. Again, he made me want to be a better person.
And I think THAT’S how you witness.
Regardless, I’m still an atheist. But I’m familiar enough with the Bible to know what the beatitudes are and they always made sense to me. They’re aspirational. A guy could really live a good life based on those.
And hey! The Pope agrees! He says the beatitudes are the path for a happy and successful life. The Ten Commandments are important (sure), but the beatitudes are the key.
For those not in the know, the beatitudes are the things in Matthew 5 - the blessed are the meek statements.
Honestly, I wonder why there aren’t casts of the beatitudes rather than the Ten Commandments all over the place.
Anyway, the whole book got me thinking about religion and the religious. The lawyerly, pedantic questions started popping up.
For instance: I was told by my church that, in order to get the salvation mentioned in the Bible, I needed to prostrate myself and say the magic words - invite Jesus into my heart and admit I was a sinner and all that - and then change the way I lived and convert.
I was also told that God can see what’s in your heart, which makes sense.
But if god can see what’s in your heart, aren’t the words kind of meaningless?
Also, what exactly is conversion? I would argue - am more than happy to argue - that when the Bible says to convert and live a Christ-like life, it doesn’t mean put on a suit and go to church on sundays, tithe 10% (gross, not net), and vote “no” on anything gay. I would argue that it means to accept the beatitudes as a path and try to be a better person. That converting is a thing that goes to your core. Not just words and easy acts like dedicating a couple hours a week and sacrificing football but being a better person and continuing to strive for improvement. Fight for the weak, seek justice, be meek, etc.
My religious friends are quick to point out that the scripture specifically says that acts are not enough, but at this point, I’m not sure I could buy that. If words were enough, I don’t think I could stand that either because I question the validity of a god that’s okay with some dickhead saying a special phrase and then destroying the world in his name.
Heaven, I argue, is not a speakeasy.
And I bet you a hundred dollars that if you took an atheist who lived the Christ-like life but didn’t do all the religious stuff and put them next to a person who, I don’t know, thinks we need to have a discussion about whether a raped 10-year-old should be forced to carry a baby to term, any god - any LOGICAL god - would have an easy time differentiating the two and I’d bet it wouldn’t shake out how you think.
At least, I really hope that’s the case.
I don’t know. I just think that forcing someone to play by the rules of your religion like you think people will get used to them, accept them, and eventually find their way to god by way of them is NOT the way to go. That’s banging on doors on Saturday morning when you would have SO much more success if you would just act like Buck and be a good person.
Ah, but who am I? As an atheist I’ll be the first to say I don’t have any skin in his game. The Bible tells me exactly where I’m going and I’m packing shorts for the trip, but I just wanted to share with the faithful that there’s a better way to get what you SAY you want. And not only that, but you’re disregarding the rules in your own rule book and you should take a moment to think about what’s going on and how everyone’s acting. Because it feels really weird to be an atheist who seems to care more about humanity and the world than people who are specifically told by their GOD to do so.
At this point, I feel like someone who walked into a room where kids are playing “the floor is lava” and having to point out that an awful lot of people are standing in lava and disregarding it because they’re more concerned about other people on the edges of the pillows on the floor.
Like, bro. You’re IN THE LAVA. Get better.