What do you think?
Rate this book
The Civil War #9
The Coastal War: Chesapeake Bay to Rio Grande
Coastal War, The: Chesapeake Bay to Rio Grande by Chaitin, Peter M. et al.
176 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1984
48 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
October 21, 2011
My first real exposure to literature on the Civil War was as a kid of about nine or ten, when I realized that I knew literally nothing about the actual military history of the war, so got a one-volume childrens' history of it from the library to get a good basic overview. (That's one of many books I read as a kid that aren't on my Goodreads shelves, because I long ago forgot the author/title information.) Since then, besides treatments of the war in general American history, I've read a few books or parts of books on aspects of the war, as well as some Civil War fiction (and watched Ken Burns' excellent multi-part PBS documentary, the Gettysburg miniseries based on The Killer Angels, and the movie Gods and Generals; I highly recommend all three!) and have enough interest in it to have visited some related sites here in western Virginia, but I don't consider myself an expert on it. This particular book is another one I've been reading in the bathroom at my son-in-law's house (long story), and is, as the above description indicates, one volume in a major Time-Life series that covers the whole war.
The Civil War exerts a peculiar fascination for --even haunts-- American historical memory. In terms of Americans killed, it was the bloodiest war we ever fought; most Americans have ancestors whose lives were affected by it; and it was a very real pivot point of our history (it's no accident that 1865 is the usual dividing line between semesters in American history courses.) But more than that, it left a legacy of moral and political issues whose unresolved condition still shapes our political conflicts, and belies the rosy triumphalist view of the conflict usually taught in grade school. Both the hardcore Left and the cultists of the Lost Cause hand down competing simplistic mythologies that reduce the conflict to a crusade of good vs. evil, and that energize and serve as weapons in their ongoing ideological hatreds today (and both essentially spit on any historian who disturbs their myth with unwelcome facts). And many of us who belong to neither camp continually recur to the war as a tragic mirror of the human flaws and mistakes that hung around our nation's neck since its founding, that shape our present, and that most people refuse to learn from today. Hopefully not to oversimplify the issues myself, but to put my own view concisely, two principles shape my view of the war and its prelude and ongoing aftermath: slavery and the racism that underlay it were (and are) unqualified and pernicious evils, "a curse, an unmitigated curse, for the white race as well as for the black;" AND the American constitutional compact between the states was (and legally still is) purely voluntary, and never intended to create a centralized Leviathan-State with absolute power and authoritarian aims. (Given those two assumptions, it's pretty clear that I won't be adopting an uncritical, hagiographic endorsement of either side of the
conflict, and can point plenty of accusing fingers at both of them.)
Chaitin, however, doesn't deal with analysis of the causes and results of the war in all of their messy complexity, nor stake out any brief for either side. His is strictly an objective, factual military history of the usually amphibious coastal campaigns waged from 1861-65, mostly in the Carolinas, but also covering operations in Florida, Mobile Bay, and the New Orleans area. (He mentions the duel between the Monitor and the Merrimac only in a passing one-sentence reference while discussing something else, and doesn't cover any operations on the Virginia or Texas coasts, although both Norfolk and Galveston were more militarily important than most people are aware of; but probably those campaigns are covered in other books of the series.) The author himself is a professional freelance writer who contributed two previous volumes to the series; he had the help of four consultants who actually are experts in the field, and his extensive bibliography included a substantial number of primary sources. As a result, his history is solidly authoritative and often quite detailed; and his style is lively and absorbing. In the Time-Life tradition, the book is also heavily illustrated, mainly with contemporary black-and-white photographs that are themselves primary sources (this was the first major war to be extensively photographed), but also with some color reproductions of paintings, such as those of Confederate soldier/artist Conrad Wise Chapman, who painted many scenes of the defense of Charleston from life. Since Chaitin doesn't employ footnotes (though the book has a good index), this wouldn't be classed as a "scholarly" treatment; but it's certainly a serious one, and aimed at the intelligent reader, in or out of academia, with an interest in the subject. Any such reader will find it informative (I learned a ton of facts I didn't previously know!), and a fascinating, well-written read.
The Civil War exerts a peculiar fascination for --even haunts-- American historical memory. In terms of Americans killed, it was the bloodiest war we ever fought; most Americans have ancestors whose lives were affected by it; and it was a very real pivot point of our history (it's no accident that 1865 is the usual dividing line between semesters in American history courses.) But more than that, it left a legacy of moral and political issues whose unresolved condition still shapes our political conflicts, and belies the rosy triumphalist view of the conflict usually taught in grade school. Both the hardcore Left and the cultists of the Lost Cause hand down competing simplistic mythologies that reduce the conflict to a crusade of good vs. evil, and that energize and serve as weapons in their ongoing ideological hatreds today (and both essentially spit on any historian who disturbs their myth with unwelcome facts). And many of us who belong to neither camp continually recur to the war as a tragic mirror of the human flaws and mistakes that hung around our nation's neck since its founding, that shape our present, and that most people refuse to learn from today. Hopefully not to oversimplify the issues myself, but to put my own view concisely, two principles shape my view of the war and its prelude and ongoing aftermath: slavery and the racism that underlay it were (and are) unqualified and pernicious evils, "a curse, an unmitigated curse, for the white race as well as for the black;" AND the American constitutional compact between the states was (and legally still is) purely voluntary, and never intended to create a centralized Leviathan-State with absolute power and authoritarian aims. (Given those two assumptions, it's pretty clear that I won't be adopting an uncritical, hagiographic endorsement of either side of the
conflict, and can point plenty of accusing fingers at both of them.)
Chaitin, however, doesn't deal with analysis of the causes and results of the war in all of their messy complexity, nor stake out any brief for either side. His is strictly an objective, factual military history of the usually amphibious coastal campaigns waged from 1861-65, mostly in the Carolinas, but also covering operations in Florida, Mobile Bay, and the New Orleans area. (He mentions the duel between the Monitor and the Merrimac only in a passing one-sentence reference while discussing something else, and doesn't cover any operations on the Virginia or Texas coasts, although both Norfolk and Galveston were more militarily important than most people are aware of; but probably those campaigns are covered in other books of the series.) The author himself is a professional freelance writer who contributed two previous volumes to the series; he had the help of four consultants who actually are experts in the field, and his extensive bibliography included a substantial number of primary sources. As a result, his history is solidly authoritative and often quite detailed; and his style is lively and absorbing. In the Time-Life tradition, the book is also heavily illustrated, mainly with contemporary black-and-white photographs that are themselves primary sources (this was the first major war to be extensively photographed), but also with some color reproductions of paintings, such as those of Confederate soldier/artist Conrad Wise Chapman, who painted many scenes of the defense of Charleston from life. Since Chaitin doesn't employ footnotes (though the book has a good index), this wouldn't be classed as a "scholarly" treatment; but it's certainly a serious one, and aimed at the intelligent reader, in or out of academia, with an interest in the subject. Any such reader will find it informative (I learned a ton of facts I didn't previously know!), and a fascinating, well-written read.
August 30, 2020
Very good, albeit very brief, overview of the war along the coasts during the War Between the States. As is typical of the Time-Life series, well illustrated with easily the best cartography in any published series on military history.
Beginning with a look at Burnside's North Carolina campaign in late 1861 and early 1862, moving to the fall of New Orleans, back to the small scale, but still important, contest in the North Carolina tidewater area around Plymouth and New Bern, then showcasing the siege of Charleston, moving from there to the Battle of Mobile Bay, and closing the book with a brief, but extremely well written, snippet of the Battle of Fort Fisher.
Obviously, not every engagement could be covered, or every major operation for that matter, given the brevity of the individual volumes of the series. But it was well written, and as part of the larger whole, is an excellent volume to read through with much to learn from.
Beginning with a look at Burnside's North Carolina campaign in late 1861 and early 1862, moving to the fall of New Orleans, back to the small scale, but still important, contest in the North Carolina tidewater area around Plymouth and New Bern, then showcasing the siege of Charleston, moving from there to the Battle of Mobile Bay, and closing the book with a brief, but extremely well written, snippet of the Battle of Fort Fisher.
Obviously, not every engagement could be covered, or every major operation for that matter, given the brevity of the individual volumes of the series. But it was well written, and as part of the larger whole, is an excellent volume to read through with much to learn from.
September 25, 2016
This book of the Time-Life The Civil War series has been on my home library shelf since 1984. This year I intend to read the text in all 26 books of the series. I only enjoyed the pictures before.
September 28, 2018
The campaigns and battles included are rather well covered for such a brief book. However, the overall coverage is a bit spotty; coastal North Carolina (including Fort Fisher), Charleston Harbor, August 1864 Mobile Bay, and the 1862 New Orleans campaign are all included. The author mostly ignores Virginia, Georgia, Florida, and Texas.
August 2, 2024
A very good explination of a series of battles that I only knew must have existed.
March 3, 2013
Another about the civil war part I like best...the ships vs shore!
September 13, 2015
Very informative. The U.S. Navy played a very important and extensive part during the civil war
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews