The publication of The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road in 1972 marked the birth of the 'new military history', which emphasized military organization - mobilization, pay, supply, morale and, above all, logistics - rather than military 'events' such as sieges and battles. Geoffrey Parker studied one of the great logistical feats of early modern Europe: how Habsburg Spain managed to maintain and mobilize the largest army in Europe in an 80-year effort to suppress the Dutch Revolt, at 700 miles' distance. Using a unique combination of surviving records, he presented strikingly the logistical problems of fighting wars in early modern Europe, and demonstrated why Spain failed to suppress the Dutch Revolt. The book has been constantly cited since its first publication in English (with translations into Spanish and Dutch). This revised second edition includes some new sources and updates some references but otherwise remains faithful to the original version.
Geoffrey Parker is Andreas Dorpalen Professor of European History and an Associate of the Mershon Center at The Ohio State University. He has published widely on the social, political and military history of early modern Europe, and in 2012 the Royal Dutch Academy recognized these achievements by awarding him its biennial Heineken Foundation Prize for History, open to scholars in any field, and any period, from any country.
Parker has written or co-written thirty-nine books, including The Military Revolution: Military innovation and the rise of the West, 1500-1800 (Cambridge University Press, 1988), winner of the 'best book prize' from both the American Military Institute and the Society for the History of Technology; The Grand Strategy of Philip II (Yale University Press, 1998), which won the Samuel Eliot Morison Prize from the Society of Military History; and Global Crisis: War, Climate Change and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century (Yale University Press, 2013), which won the Society of Military History’s Distinguished Book Prize and also one of the three medals awarded in 2014 by the British Academy for ‘a landmark academic achievement… which has transformed understanding of a particular subject’.
Before moving to Ohio State in 1997, Parker taught at Cambridge and St Andrews universities in Britain, at the University of British Columbia in Canada, and at Illinois and Yale Universities in the United States, teaching courses on the Reformation, European history and military history at both undergraduate and graduate levels. He has directed or co-directed over thirty Doctoral Dissertations to completion, as well as several undergraduate theses. In 2006 he won an OSU Alumni Distinguished Teaching Award.
He lives in Columbus, Ohio, and has four children. In 1987 he was diagnosed as having Multiple Sclerosis. His latest book is Imprudent King: A New Life of Philip II (Yale University Press, 2014).
Interesante tratado histórico sobre la guerra de los 80 años. Aunque a ratos se hace un tanto difícil de leer, sobre todo por la gran cantidad de datos históricos que maneja, el libro da una visión general y muy contextualizada de lo que supuso para el imperio español de la época lidiar con una guerra de desgaste tan lejos de sus fronteras. Una guerra que fue el punto débil por el que todos sus enemigos atacaron para debilitarlo, y que le hizo consumir gran cantidad de recursos militares y financieros. Sobre todo la conclusión al final del libro es muy esclarecedora sobre los motivos que llevaron al imperio español al colapso, principalmente y entre otros, la mala gestión política de esta guerra que hizo la dinastía Habsburgo debido a su intolerancia al protestantismo y su afán por que hubiera gobernantes católicos en toda Europa. Aunque el libro me ha parecido muy interesante, dudo que le pueda gustar a alguien a quien no le guste la historia, y en especial éste periodo histórico.
This is truly a fantastic and unique work. This isn’t a story of battles and campaigns, but rather a story of how Spain lost an empire by not knowing when to stop pouring men and money into hopeless causes.
I’m sure the 80 Years War of the 16th and 17th centuries between Spain on one side and the rebelling Dutch plus French and English on the other side is little studied today, but back then it was a bout of superpowers and between the Protestant states and the Catholic states. So, you had all the fervor of religious conflict as well as economic warfare.
To fund the war Spain was looting the Americas at will, which provided opportunity to Dutch and English privateers to capture or sink Spanish treasure fleets. Some fleets made it to Spain, others did not.
But while this book talks about these issues it excels in explaining what the famous “Spanish Road” was, why it was so important, and the trials and travails of those who had to travel it. Mr. Parker goes into great detail about the financing of the Army of Flanders, how it received the money it needed to pay the troops, or, more often, what the ramifications of not receiving these funds caused. The famine, mutiny, desertions, politics and weather all played their role. Let alone the schemes of Elizabethan England, the French and the crafty Dutch themselves.
It was the time of Rembrandt, Elizabeth I, an old Louis XIII and the young Louis XIV, the Prince of Orange, Alva, Phillip II, III and IV, and Spinola.
Altogether, a great read, without being too detailed to lose focus. If you know little or nothing about the period you won’t have a problem with this book, it assumes nothing and the writing is clear, crisp and interesting.
In The Army of Flanders, Parker chronicles the Spanish Empire’s failed efforts to quell the revolt of the Dutch Estates between 1568 and 1648. It is a book about warfare, but not about fighting. Parker does not describe the many grand battles and sieges that made up Spain’s eighty-year-long struggle to hold on to its northernmost European possession. Instead, he talks about what it takes to get soldiers to the battlefield -- the intricate networks of finance and logistics that prop up all armies, and ensure that the troops have food in their bellies, money in their pockets, and powder and shot in their muskets.
The 1500s brought about a set of transformative military-technological developments: the mass proliferation of gunpowder weapons, improvements in defensive infrastructure, and a shift away from elite bands of mounted aristocrats and towards large infantry formations as the primary fighting forces. The result was an explosion in the scale, cost, and complexity of warfare.
Early modern polities were hopelessly unprepared for these changes. The story of European warfare in the 16th and 17th century is the story of princes straining against the limitations of technology and state capacity to muster the money, supplies, and manpower necessary to feed the insatiable hunger of their armies. To this end, they were forced to seek new instruments of tax collection, organization, and recruitment. These instruments formed the foundations of modern statehood. In the words of Charles Tilly: “The war made the state, and the state made war.”.
The Army of Flanders, deployed by the King of Spain to crush the Dutch Revolt, stood at the epicentre of this process. For eighty years, it was the largest, most fearsome fighting force in Europe. To maintain it at a distance of several hundred miles away from the Castilian heartland, the Spanish constructed a sophisticated administrative apparatus, the likes of which was never seen in Europe.
The soldiers of the Army of Flanders were drawn from all across the Continent -- not just the Netherlands, but also Germany, Italy, and Spain itself. Troops from the latter two regions were moved to the battlefields of north-western Europe by land, along the so-called Spanish Road. The Road was made up of a string of disparate territories belonging to the House of Habsburg, which stretched all the way from the Apennine Peninsula into Belgium. The transit of recruits was subject to strict calendars and dependent on control of key strongpoints.
Once in the Netherlands, the soldiers were paid with the help of a large network of creditors, linked to the Spanish Crown. Spanish imperialism was fuelled by the influx of gold and silver, borne from the Americas by its galleons; however, transporting specie directly to the Army of Flanders was deemed too risky. Thus, gold was transferred to bankers and merchants, who then discharged the Crown’s financial obligations in its stead. To enact oversight over the vast sums of money shifted between Spain and Flanders, the Spanish Habsburg devised complex oversight and accounting mechanisms.
There was another reason for why Spain relied so heavily on creditors to sustain its war -- it was perpetually short on money. American treasure and Iberian taxes covered just a fraction of the costs of the Army of Flanders. The Army’s financial situation fluctuated, but there was not a single year over its eighty-year-long service where its demands were fully provided for. For almost a century, Spain waged a war that it could not afford. The Crown declared bankruptcy twice in just the late 1500s because it was unable to shoulder the burdens of its many military commitments. Despite this, the Army of Flanders fought on -- through countless defeats and mutinies, constantly underpaid and underequipped.
Parker’s book chronicles the many difficulties encountered by the Spanish in the Dutch wars, and the countless inadequacies of their state system. In many ways, it comes off as an account of Spain’s failures, not the least because of the incontrovertible fact that the Army of Flanders ultimately lost most of the Netherlands to the rebels. However, this should not detract from how impressive it was for Spain to keep its forces in the field for so long, at such a great distance, and with such limited means.
Parker’s book shines a light on the material underpinnings of the Spanish Empire. The Eighty Years War covered the better half of Spain’s time as Europe’s pre-eminent power. It serves as a microcosm for the empire’s basic strategic challenge -- it was perpetually overstretched, forced to defend disparate dynastic holdings strewn across half the Continent. Its might was sustained by two things -- the superiority of its arms, and the spectacular riches of the Americas, carved from the heart of the New World by blood-soaked conquistadors. The Spanish Empire was a gigantic funnel, transforming American treasure into mercenary armies on European soil. When the gold and silver dried up, and the weight of Spain’s many wars turned unbearable, the empire unraveled. In the Netherlands, it sustained its first decisive loss.
The defeat of Spain’s tercios by the French at Rocroi in 1643 is often held up as the ending of Spain’s military superiority, which in turn heralded the collapse of its imperial might. In reality, Rocroi merely sealed a deeper, more prolonged process, wherein the Spanish state gradually grew unable to keep up with the many demands on its capacity. Spain simply could not supply and pay for enough troops to hold on to its empire any longer. If there is one lesson to Parker’s book, it is this: more often than not, wars are not won or lost on the battlefield, but in the supply depot and the counting house.
An excellent, well-crafted account of how the Spanish raised, equipped, fed, and paid the armies with which they intended to keep the Spanish Netherlands under their rule. You know the old saying: amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics. Parker gives the reader some very, very clear examples of why the old saying is true. Clearly written, with straightforward explanations of technical issues, and good political-diplomatic sense as well. If you're interested in Early Modern Europe and in what underlay power politics, well...let me introduce you to Geoffrey Parker.
Excellent book on how Spain managed the 80 Years War, going into great detail on the logistics and manpower of the lifetime of the conflict. How soldiers were raised, how money was raised, how money was paid, what happened when the troops were not paid (which was a very frequent occurrence) are the main things the book touches upon.
This book assumes some level of familiarity with what happned in the war and the geo-political backdrop in which it was fought. It touches on the military action only tangentially when it bears on the main topics of the work.
Geoffrey Parker es uno de los mayores estudiosos del periodo de los tercios españoles. Libro muy interesante para dejar de lado la épica y entender los problemas políticos, económicos y logísticos de un ejército en campaña… Y porque España acabo agotando sus recursos y perdiendo por lo tanto la guerra.
This is a fine fine book. For a book about military logistics you could be forgiven for thinking that it would be dull as dishwater. But alas this is massively interesting and dare I say entertaining.
Always love reading the fleshed out editions of PhD theses by renowned historians like this since we get to see their raw talent directed towards comprehensive coverage of a focused topic without the distractions of responsibilities coming from success later in their careers.
In this case, Parker takes a great approach to covering the logistics of 80 Years' War and he supports it with an impressive array of original research. My only criticism is that the the second half, while still interesting, is perhaps a bit too drawn out. Highly recommended!
“Poner una pica en Flandes” es una expresión española que indica que se realizó algo muy complicado y costoso y que además supone un hito. Parker utiliza archivos de la época y fuentes actuales para narrar la gesta española que, por motivos de religión y honra nacional, desgastó y finalmente marcó el ocaso de los tercios y del Imperio Español. Algo tedioso en algunos pasajes por el uso en ocasiones excesivo de cifras, logra poner en perspectiva lo difícil (y la muestra increíble de poderío) que fue mover soldados y dinero por el llamado Camino Español
Heralded as marking the birth of new military history, Parker's study reviews the history of the 80 Year War entirely in economic/material terms, eschewing tactics and personalities almost entirely. I have a weird thing about the Wars of Religion, but even if you didn't I think there's something fascinating about reading something which forces one to consider the infinite complexities of human existence, that behind the siege of Breda or the Battle of Rocroi were hundreds of sutlers waiting to turn carrion scavenge into specie.
Parker is one of my favourite historians of that era. His books are always well written and easy to read and this book is no exception.
This should not be your first book on the eighty years war or dutch revolt as it goes into great detail of a very narrow aspect of the conflict. It makes more sense with some historical context.
It is an amazing book up until the first half, then the author starts to delve too much on the economics of the army, and goes in great detail about the salary of each soldier, their expense, the total price that cost the Spanish crown the Army of the Flanders and that's plain boring. The mutiny chapter started very promising until he started to delve about moneyz again. The book should have been called " Economics of the Army of the Flanders "
But other than that, it is a very good book ( would have been excellent if the author wasn't obssesed with money ) it shows how much the author is enthusiastic about Dutch history and the subject in hand and the style is excellent. Especially the first half of the book, I could not stop reading it.
A very good and complete book. Very interesting to understand how were the armies f the XVI century and which were the problems of the Spanish Haubsbourgs in Flandes.
Parker manages to make logistical history fascinating. The complexity of politics and military action in the early modern age is both clearly described and impressively researched.