I know the title of this sounds like whatever the opposite of a barrel of monkeys is, fun-wise. But if you are interested in an alternative, seemingly radical exploration of what it means to educate a child, this book is quite the eye-opener and challenger of conventional popular American educational theory and practice.
Of particular interest (to me anyway) are the essays "The Public School Nightmare: Why Fix a System Designed to Destroy Individual Thought?" by John Taylor Gatto, and "Learning? Yes, of Course. Education? No, Thanks" by Aaron Falbel. These two essays alone make this book worth a look-see. Here are some things you will encounter in both of them:
-- Compulsory education has only existed in the US since 1852.
-- The reason the US finally adopted compulsory education in 1852 was because the system had been used with great success in Prussia as a means of producing compliant soldiers and workers who did not think too much (which would make them harder to control). This may sound outlandish, but Gatto's essay on the subject references specific facts and quotes from the proponents of this new, radical, compulsion policy.
-- The notion that subjects can be neatly split up into sub-headings and sections came to the US with the idea of compulsory schooling. Also, the practice of sounding a jarring bell between classes (which arbitrarily forces children to "stop learning" for this subject and move on to other subjects, regardless of where their curiosity and initiative is leading them) was instituted by design, with the express purpose of assuring that students would not be able to maintain sustained, comprehensive thought.
I could go on and on (maybe I already have?), but I will summarize with this: Do not read this book unless you are ready to have some of your ingrained ideas about education challenged, or at least re-contexted.