What do you think?
Rate this book
The Age of Questions: or, A First Attempt at an Aggregate History of the Eastern, Social, Woman, American, Jewish, Polish, Bullion, Tuberculosis, and Many Other Questions over the Nineteenth Century, and Beyond
A groundbreaking history of the Big Questions that dominated the nineteenth century
In the early nineteenth century, a new age began: the age of questions. In the Eastern and Belgian questions, as much as in the slavery, worker, social, woman, and Jewish questions, contemporaries saw not interrogatives to be answered but problems to be solved. Alexis de Tocqueville, Victor Hugo, Karl Marx, Frederick Douglass, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Rosa Luxemburg, and Adolf Hitler were among the many who put their pens to the task. The Age of Questions asks how the question form arose, what trajectory it followed, and why it provoked such feverish excitement for over a century. Was there a family resemblance between questions? Have they disappeared, or are they on the rise again in our time?
In this pioneering book, Holly Case undertakes a stunningly original analysis, presenting, chapter by chapter, seven distinct arguments and frameworks for understanding the age. She considers whether it was marked by a progressive quest for emancipation (of women, slaves, Jews, laborers, and others); a steady, inexorable march toward genocide and the "Final Solution"; or a movement toward federation and the dissolution of boundaries. Or was it simply a farce, a false frenzy dreamed up by publicists eager to sell subscriptions? As the arguments clash, patterns emerge and sharpen until the age reveals its full and peculiar nature.
Turning convention on its head with meticulous and astonishingly broad scholarship, The Age of Questions illuminates how patterns of thinking move history.
In the early nineteenth century, a new age began: the age of questions. In the Eastern and Belgian questions, as much as in the slavery, worker, social, woman, and Jewish questions, contemporaries saw not interrogatives to be answered but problems to be solved. Alexis de Tocqueville, Victor Hugo, Karl Marx, Frederick Douglass, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Rosa Luxemburg, and Adolf Hitler were among the many who put their pens to the task. The Age of Questions asks how the question form arose, what trajectory it followed, and why it provoked such feverish excitement for over a century. Was there a family resemblance between questions? Have they disappeared, or are they on the rise again in our time?
In this pioneering book, Holly Case undertakes a stunningly original analysis, presenting, chapter by chapter, seven distinct arguments and frameworks for understanding the age. She considers whether it was marked by a progressive quest for emancipation (of women, slaves, Jews, laborers, and others); a steady, inexorable march toward genocide and the "Final Solution"; or a movement toward federation and the dissolution of boundaries. Or was it simply a farce, a false frenzy dreamed up by publicists eager to sell subscriptions? As the arguments clash, patterns emerge and sharpen until the age reveals its full and peculiar nature.
Turning convention on its head with meticulous and astonishingly broad scholarship, The Age of Questions illuminates how patterns of thinking move history.
- GenresHistoryNonfiction
360 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2018
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
February 3, 2022
Focusing on the long 19th century (1780s - 1940s), Age of Questions traces the fundamental patterns of thought that defined the rise of modernity. It does so by investigating the "X Question" format as it existed in the public discourse: a wholly original perspective that really lays bare the age in all its contradictions and strong, impressionable patterns of thought.
If you are a historian, you are especially familiar with the debates that once surrounded the Jewish Question, the Social Question, the Women's Question, and so on. The age was brimming with questions posed as problems to be solved. However, despite being a concept so ubiquitous to historians, there has never been a study on the "X question" format itself. Yet it is by studying the progression of the form that arguably one best grasps the long European century in all its intellectual variety; how strongly the weight of history and the present was felt on all the problems of the day; how everything became more and more bundled into universal problems requiring universal solutions; how life was such a miserable riddle that nobody could solve; and, as the age went on, how people became more and more desperate for solutions to a fanatical degree. So many victims of history were produced by these unsolvable questions, and many began to think that only way these demons could be cast out was through war.
This book has succeeded in reshaping my historical understanding of how discourse develops. Best of all, the perspective allows one to understand this historical era in its totality. It is so difficult to capture a 'spirit of the age' with any coherency, but I think the Age of Questions comes very close. The patterns of thought discussed are so strong that it absorbs you completely, so much so that one can imagine the European '19th century mind' as it was and as it was lived.
The possible avenues of research that could come from this perspective are exciting and, in this regard, it's a real trailblazer. This text deserves to be more widely read because, I believe, it has serious ramifications not just for historical scholarship, but for assessing the patterns of thought present in our own age. What happened to the Age of Questions, and could it someday return? Although our present moment is so alien from the long 19th century, it's possible the old can recur again with the same intensity but with its own unique flavor.
I'll end this short review by recounting one individual, not mentioned in the book, but who was one of the many victims of the Age of Questions and its unsolvable riddles. During WWI, Frano Supilo was a leading member of the Yugoslav Committee. For decades, the "South Slav Question," as it was called, emerged as a problem without a solution. Thought to be "late to history" in their national reawakening, Supilo argued for a union with the 'other tribes of the Balkans,' but the chain of events which transpired were too much to bear. I think it is safe to say the Question killed him, as he died of a psychotic breakdown-induced heart attack in 1917 while being in exile in London. "Frano Supilo... whose heart was eaten by the Croatian wound," wrote poet Miroslav Krleža, another victim of the Age of Questions.
5/5
If you are a historian, you are especially familiar with the debates that once surrounded the Jewish Question, the Social Question, the Women's Question, and so on. The age was brimming with questions posed as problems to be solved. However, despite being a concept so ubiquitous to historians, there has never been a study on the "X question" format itself. Yet it is by studying the progression of the form that arguably one best grasps the long European century in all its intellectual variety; how strongly the weight of history and the present was felt on all the problems of the day; how everything became more and more bundled into universal problems requiring universal solutions; how life was such a miserable riddle that nobody could solve; and, as the age went on, how people became more and more desperate for solutions to a fanatical degree. So many victims of history were produced by these unsolvable questions, and many began to think that only way these demons could be cast out was through war.
This book has succeeded in reshaping my historical understanding of how discourse develops. Best of all, the perspective allows one to understand this historical era in its totality. It is so difficult to capture a 'spirit of the age' with any coherency, but I think the Age of Questions comes very close. The patterns of thought discussed are so strong that it absorbs you completely, so much so that one can imagine the European '19th century mind' as it was and as it was lived.
The possible avenues of research that could come from this perspective are exciting and, in this regard, it's a real trailblazer. This text deserves to be more widely read because, I believe, it has serious ramifications not just for historical scholarship, but for assessing the patterns of thought present in our own age. What happened to the Age of Questions, and could it someday return? Although our present moment is so alien from the long 19th century, it's possible the old can recur again with the same intensity but with its own unique flavor.
I'll end this short review by recounting one individual, not mentioned in the book, but who was one of the many victims of the Age of Questions and its unsolvable riddles. During WWI, Frano Supilo was a leading member of the Yugoslav Committee. For decades, the "South Slav Question," as it was called, emerged as a problem without a solution. Thought to be "late to history" in their national reawakening, Supilo argued for a union with the 'other tribes of the Balkans,' but the chain of events which transpired were too much to bear. I think it is safe to say the Question killed him, as he died of a psychotic breakdown-induced heart attack in 1917 while being in exile in London. "Frano Supilo... whose heart was eaten by the Croatian wound," wrote poet Miroslav Krleža, another victim of the Age of Questions.
5/5
Want to Read
September 16, 2018Nice review by Ian P Beacock in the Los Angeles Review of Books.
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/t...
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/t...
January 22, 2022
Thinking of the era from around the 1830s until The Second World War as an Age of Questions is an interesting take on intellectual history and definitely makes sense, considering how much was the word "Question" used by very different thinkers contemplating about public and global issues (from Dostoyevsky to Hitler) of that time. The author in this sense has been successful in persuading me to think that the aforementioned period of about 100 years really was intellectually one of questions.
However the book really was not a pleasant read (in the sense of reading being a genuine pleasure not a mental struggle), mostly because of its awkward structure. I guess the stiffly long title of the book already gives away its disorderly design. It really reminded me of Walter Benjamin's wish, to write an entire book consisting only of quotes. Well, this read came pretty close to that . The author's own ideas seem to go missing in the myriad of voices she introduces to the reader. So her own 7 arguments about the Age of Questions (one introduced in every 7 chapters) don't really come out that well and some left me quite confused. Nevertheless the book was very informative and introduced me to a number of 19th and 20th thinkers that I am looking forward to reading myself in the future.
However the book really was not a pleasant read (in the sense of reading being a genuine pleasure not a mental struggle), mostly because of its awkward structure. I guess the stiffly long title of the book already gives away its disorderly design. It really reminded me of Walter Benjamin's wish, to write an entire book consisting only of quotes. Well, this read came pretty close to that . The author's own ideas seem to go missing in the myriad of voices she introduces to the reader. So her own 7 arguments about the Age of Questions (one introduced in every 7 chapters) don't really come out that well and some left me quite confused. Nevertheless the book was very informative and introduced me to a number of 19th and 20th thinkers that I am looking forward to reading myself in the future.
April 16, 2023
A well reasearched book, that didn’t really hold together under the incredible breadth it was striving to cover. Examines the age of questions from a variety of angles to look for patterns and commonalities. At times seems more like a grab back of facts on the topic than a coherent argument given how broad the range of questions covered truly is.
May 6, 2023
This was a really fascinating history to read because it is split into 7 separate and contradicting arguments, all argued brilliantly by the author- itself reflecting the contradictions of the day. Heartily recommended
May 21, 2025
This intriguingly titled book seemed to offer a new way to think about the nineteenth century. No doubt it was indeed the age of questions, and seeing the many questions all together seems a valuable insight. Unfortunately, for all the research and work Professor Case put into this book, it never quite comes together. Despite having read the introduction, and therefore being familiar with each chapter was framed as an argument, I was really looking forward to a conclusion so I could understand what Case herself thought mattered, and then suddenly I was done, with Hitler and Robert Musil once again invoked to suggest that we were no longer in the age of questions without any real explanation of why it had come to an end. In a word, Case herself had not fully thought through the insight she had gained from all her work.
This is regrettable, there is enough here to say that Case appears to have been 90% or maybe even 95% there, but the frame is missing, or perhaps it is that she got so enamored of Dostoevsky's question about why so many questions seemed to be rising up to see the obvious. She locates the origins of thinking in terms of questions with North America and its relations with Great Britain in mid 1700s. One might think this would clue us into the centrality of the great unraveling of old regime hierarchy that was occurring and gave the rebelling colonists their argument. While the Bullion Question may not be directly connected to that, but the two types of questions that get most coverage in this book National and various sorts of social questions are directly connected to that transformational change, and the natural instability it provoked. Dostoevsky cannot be blamed for not reading Ernest Gellner's Thought and Change, since he had been dead for over 60 years when it was published, but had Case turned to it, she might have understood what Dostoevsky could not, the old regime order was no longer working, and its replacement was being worked out.
As for the end of the questions and its subsequent meaning, here too Case's not unwarranted desire to connect this story with Hitler and the search for the "Endlösung" her fondness for Musil seems to have blinded her to the fact that Hitler and Musil's tedium with questions are bookends rather than true contributors to the age of questions, which ended more or less with end of World War I and the establishment of Wilsonian Europe and the gathering momentum expanding the voting franchise to include women. This is not to argue that all social issues had been resolved. The question of how to organize mass society most effectively was reaching real urgency. Nonetheless, that debate was not driven by questions, but by differing visions of progress and the specific eschatology that will bring resolution to the questions everyone was tired of. Put another way, Hitler's interest was in stifling the whole mental framework that had led to all those questions, which of course he blamed on the Jews. Meanwhile, Musil was closer to the mark. the x-question framework was dead, because it was not asking the relevant questions.
This is regrettable, there is enough here to say that Case appears to have been 90% or maybe even 95% there, but the frame is missing, or perhaps it is that she got so enamored of Dostoevsky's question about why so many questions seemed to be rising up to see the obvious. She locates the origins of thinking in terms of questions with North America and its relations with Great Britain in mid 1700s. One might think this would clue us into the centrality of the great unraveling of old regime hierarchy that was occurring and gave the rebelling colonists their argument. While the Bullion Question may not be directly connected to that, but the two types of questions that get most coverage in this book National and various sorts of social questions are directly connected to that transformational change, and the natural instability it provoked. Dostoevsky cannot be blamed for not reading Ernest Gellner's Thought and Change, since he had been dead for over 60 years when it was published, but had Case turned to it, she might have understood what Dostoevsky could not, the old regime order was no longer working, and its replacement was being worked out.
As for the end of the questions and its subsequent meaning, here too Case's not unwarranted desire to connect this story with Hitler and the search for the "Endlösung" her fondness for Musil seems to have blinded her to the fact that Hitler and Musil's tedium with questions are bookends rather than true contributors to the age of questions, which ended more or less with end of World War I and the establishment of Wilsonian Europe and the gathering momentum expanding the voting franchise to include women. This is not to argue that all social issues had been resolved. The question of how to organize mass society most effectively was reaching real urgency. Nonetheless, that debate was not driven by questions, but by differing visions of progress and the specific eschatology that will bring resolution to the questions everyone was tired of. Put another way, Hitler's interest was in stifling the whole mental framework that had led to all those questions, which of course he blamed on the Jews. Meanwhile, Musil was closer to the mark. the x-question framework was dead, because it was not asking the relevant questions.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews