Something I hadn't expected, was to learn a few things about Islam such as: they consider Adam, Noah, Abraham and Moses as prophets. I knew they consider Jesus (Isa) as a prophet, (and only a prophet), also, that they don't think writing should be put in the Bible, but especially not the Quran.
Oddly, it felt as though the author was riding a tight rope while explaining Islam and trying to put it in the best light. How much of his errors are from trying to put the idealogy in the best light or his ignorance or something else altogether? Such as, explaining that anyone who lives in areas controlled by Islam and doesn't convert is required to pay a zakat, a form of taxation. (page 44)
However, this is not the correct word. Zakat is a form of charity. What he should have said was the jizya. He does then mention (page 46) that Zakat is giving, (not a taxation for non-muslims).
Things that surprised me: muslims don't think Christians pray or fast. (They aren't aware the Bible tells Christians not to be like Pharisees and announce it to the world). But that they are afraid of Christians?!
Pages 66-72 the author lists the surah and aya that mentions Jesus/Isa and the Bible scripture reference verses. I wasn't able to check every aya, because my edition of the Quran doesn't have the same references as the ones the author used, but also a lot of the same ayas are used.
An aspect of the ideology that was left out by the author is that Islam is all inclusive in its life: way to live, politics, religion, etc. The author does mention on page 29 that even secular Islamic states are permeated with religious devotion and/or tradition. Every public figure is a Muslim. He mentions on page 101 political islam as if it is separate from the ideology.
pg 153 he does say that if you're born in a muslim family you are muslim and you cannot just leave. You don't get a choice. If you leave you can be ostracized or worse, killed. (this sounds very much like cult).
The author explained Muslims think the Holy Spirit is Gabriel the angel. And that they take every last writing as superior to the first. (he neglected to say that means the violent surahs supersede the peaceful surahs). The author does touch on the radical muslims that follow the violent surahs, as that is their own interpretation, (as long as they can back it up with other ayas). Unlike the Bible where it is NOT for private interpretation, (2 Peter 1:20)
pg 59 The author admits the Quran is confusing and even contradictory and though most muslims haven't read the Bible, they'll say it's corrupted, but this belief contradicts their holy book.
So why don't they accept Jesus? He doesn't fit their belief system. (example given on page 60)
So, you may be asking why the low rating? Numerous reasons, but a few are: the way he comes off anti-semitic; admitting on page 104 that he my be bias. Why side with Israel and deny the Jews are God's chosen people? Actually asking (pg 104) Does God love one people at the expense of others? (has he read the Old Testament?) It also seems, he forgets that Jesus was Jewish.
If you talk to Muslims he says not to mention certain words or phrases, because that will be offensive to them. I am in agreement of not being offensive on purpose, but Jesus didn't worry about being offensive.
pg 77-78 He uses an example of not saying "Son of God" to Muslims, because if you mistakenly thought God had a son through a sexual relationship with Mary you'd reject it too. However, Surah 19:20 in their Quran says She said, "How can I have a boy while no man has touched me and I have not been unchaste?" So why would they be offended? It's because of the lack of explaining the Godhead and if Jesus isn't explained is he (the author) really leading Muslims to God?
pg 173 he mentions "real" prayer happens with heads bowed and eyes closed. But doesn't give scripture for this assumption? Opinion? Tradition?
pg 153 he says the origin of the word Christian is "little Christs". I couldn't find that anywhere and according to Strongs Concordance it means followers of Christ. On the same page claims the Bible only mentions Christian two times, but he forgot Acts 26:28.
pg 156 "We are never commanded, exhorted, or encouraged to use the word Christian. It is, after all, a word, weighted with hidden meanings and historical grievances. A much better phrase, one I use myself, is "follower of Jesus." (edit 12.29.2022 i.e. follow Jesus, you follow God)
And yet, that is what Christian means. But because he's mentioned this, why does he use trinity? That is not in the Bible, but Godhead is, three times. (Godhead is not mentioned one time in this book). pg 174, the author doesn't seem to have an understanding of what the Bible says or what the Greek words mean, as is an example of baptism.
And then acts as though we can cherry pick which verses to believe in and calling it doctrine.
(also page 156) It then follows that his personal mission was not to found a new religion called Christianity, but rather to, as he said, "seek and save the lost." So, however we define this, we can agree that his identity, at least in his teaching and his lifestyle, was not "Christian."
It's not up for private interpretation. "however "we" define this"... Is he kidding?! Obviously not.
Interestingly, he doesn't claim a doctrine, but he seems to be very afraid of the word Christian, and because of his verbiage I think I have an idea of what doctrine he follows, but doesn't announce in the book.
Just as the Muslims try to remain Muslim, while accepting Jesus, it seems as though the author is also having an identity crisis to be a Christian without religion. I will end on that agreement though, that the Bible doesn't mention denominations. But I would only recommend this book to people who are very knowledgable of both what the Bible says and of Islam.
(I hope this review doesn't have a lot of typos, I kept having issues with my keyboard) (edited, yes it did and hopefully I fixed most of them 12.29.2022)