Global History: A Short Overview

by Noel Cowen

This short book offers a clear and engaging introduction to the history of humankind, from the earliest movements of people to the contemporary epoch of globalization. Cowen traces this complex history in a manner which offers both a compelling narrative and an analytical and comparative treatment. Drawing on a new perspective on global history, he traces the intersection of change in economics, politics and human beliefs, examining the formation, enlargement and limits of human societies. Global History shows how much of human history encompasses three intersecting forces - trading networks, expanding political empires and crusading creeds.
Abandoning the limits of a Eurocentric view of the world, the book offers a number of fresh insights. Its periodization embraces movement across continents and across the millennia. The indigenous American civilizations are included, for instance. The book also ranges over the early civilizations of China and Europe as well as the Russian and Islamic worlds. Modern American and Japanese civilizations are, in addition, a focus for attention. The author examines national and regional histories in relation to wider themes, sequences and global tendencies. In conclusion, he seeks to address the question of the extent to which a global society is beginning to crystallize.

Genres: History, World History, Nonfiction

224 pages, Paperback

First published August 22, 2001

Reviews

[Marc Lamot · Rating 1 out of 5]

This book is not a real success. It tries to bring an own contribution to the field of Global History, but I wasn't convinced by it. See my more elaborate review in my Sense-of-History account: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

[Sense of History]

That there is a globalization trend in history, is an open door. To try to recognize patterns in that evolution is creditable, but risky. Noel Cowen does such an attempt in this book. He has created an eclectic vision, building on the work of Toynbee, Braudel, McNeill and Wallerstein. But just as those big names he keeps to a compelling theoretical frame. He sees parallel evolutions at work everywhere, and thus he ignores the complexity and uniqueness of human societies and the contingency of history. Eventually his effort does not deliver new insights. I find the attempt by David Christian in "Maps of Time", although also a bit controversial, much more creditable