I checked the publication date just to be sure this was a recent publication. It came out in 2018, so quite recent. However, it reads like an outdated feminine tome on “how to be a lady and keep your man interested.”
While I don’t think the writing style is necessarily bad, I was surprised that the author teaches writing classes as some of her topics seemed ill-grouped by subject. In the “romance your husband” chapter, she talks about how French furniture has tassels and that is romantic(?) Decor choices aside, the metaphor that furniture can be sexy (including her hot pink arm chairs) seems like a bit of a stretch. She purchased a hot pink tasseled keychain in France and hung it on a an antique key in their farmhouse to remind her husband of her, and (presumably) to put a spark in his loins. Sure, Jan.
It’s not so much that this is a bad book, as it is that I personally disagree with the author in many areas. For instance, she maintains an “air of mystery” in her marriage by referring to her husband as “Doctor” as he has earned a PhD. While I would view this as sweet and flirty, and demonstrating closeness as a sort of “pet name,” she asserts that “maintaining a certain formality... is a cornerstone of marriage.” So this title is formal, and meant to invoke... formality and mystery? And thus sex appeal? Right... I’m not buying it. But again, personal opinion. All marriages are different and if that works for her, then great. But it’s not how my husband and I interact, and (I assume) not how many other happy couples interact. I think the issue with this lies in the author’s assertion that this is the ONLY way to have a good marriage, and that Americans are too informal and that it has a negative effect on marriages. Stereotyping, generalizing, or presenting “black and white” scenarios doesn’t allow for a broad range of human experiences, and is thus a foolish way of thinking, which is the very thing this author was probably trying to avoid. (Being foolish is not very “French de jour.” I wonder what French women make of these books where American women stereotype French behavior? I bet they don’t love it.)
Just before the bit about her husband and his “doctoriness,” she describes in several boring paragraphs the long flight journey she just experienced. “How dull and wearisome going through customs is!” she laments. “Woe is me, sitting in this first class seat next to a businessman for SIX WHOLE HOURS.” She sounds entitled and spoiled, regardless of whether she is or not. There are hardworking people who can’t afford to travel the world and would love the opportunity to go through long airport lines and small airplane seats to have an opportunity to explore beautiful foreign cities.
The entitlement and utter foolishness of some of these notions made this a 1 star rating for me. However, on its surface, this is not a poorly written book, the author just takes a bizarre stance on many of her chosen topics, and I don’t know how well her style of living translates to the everyday person. I suppose you can pick and choose the bits that work for you, but most of it was a wash for me. I did appreciate the gateau yogurt cake recipe, but that same recipe appears in every French culture book.
P.S. Bonus bit: She advises readers to keep romance alive by flirting with other men at dinner parties, in front of their husbands. And never go to a drive thru. (Tbh, I’m not sure if she’s joking or serious with that line.)
P.P.S. While this text fits in with Jennifer Scott and the “Madame Chic” genre of French culture writing by American women, I can’t help but wonder if this is a genre that has run its course.