“For the Black people of the world there is no bright tomorrow. The Blacks may continue to live in their dream world of singing, dancing, marching, praying, hoping, because of the deluding signs of what looks like victories—still trusting in the ultimate justice of the white man; but a thousand years hence their descendants will be substantially where the race was a thousand years before.” This profound assertion toward the end of the book perfectly sums up this classic work. In “The Destruction of Black Civilization,” the great scholar Chancellor Williams sets out to trace the tragic downfall of Black societies throughout recorded human history. He essentially identifies an unceasing—and perhaps permanent—race war, spanning 6-7 thousands years and continuing to the present, between African people and “whites.”
In grappling with this thesis one can’t help but to wonder whether it can be reconciled with the common contention—one that Williams himself asserts—that “racism as we know it was practically non-existent [in the ancient world]”. Further, his generalized references to “whites” lack definition and consistency necessary to adequately support the many sweeping assertions he makes. Despite these (and other) contradictions, this book is an astonishing analysis of the systematic destruction of Black societies throughout the continent of Africa. Williams’ basic premise is that outside settlement and incursion by foreign (non-African) peoples in African civilizations—beginning with Menes / Narmer’s unification of Upper and Lower Egypt in 3100 BC (allowing “Asiatics” to gain a steady foothold in Upper Egypt)—is the foundation of the destruction of Black civilizations. He identifies this process of gradual incursion throughout the various Nile Valley societies over the centuries, as well as in virtually every other region in Africa. In doing so, Williams’ hostility toward non-African people, as well as people with mixed African and non African ancestry (“Mulattoes”), is clear and ever-present.
Williams painstakingly details the mistakes Africans made that led to the downfall of their civilizations. From allowing minority non-African populations to marry into power, to trying to unite and integrate with these populations, Williams contrasts Africans with non-Africans by arguing that the latter had a long term vision for the future that the former lacked. Additionally, Williams identifies “the most tragic error” Black folks made in his detailing of the migratory consequences of Eurasian encroachments into African coastal areas. Williams contends that instead of maintaining highly concentrated African centers on the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts, Africans migrated further into the interior, allowing Eurasians to capture these coastal centers and control the terms and conditions of international trade and relations. This gave these foreigners the power base to eventually take over the entire continent.
Along with detailing the missteps and occurrences that led to the dismantling of several Black civilizations, Williams essentially provided a comparative case-study of African Constitutionalism versus Euro-Asian Constitutionalism. Williams noted the highly democratic and communal nature of traditional African sociopolitical organization, and contrasted it with the aggressive individualism of Europe and Western Asia. This contrast can be seen in how rulers are checked and controlled by the masses of people in African societies, as opposed to their apparent unchecked power in non-African societies. Another important difference was how African societies went about “conquering” one another, as opposed to how European and Asian societies did. The former did not reduce entire conquered populations into slavery, did not destroy Indigenous political, cultural and social institutions, and did not upset the basic mode of land ownership among the people. Further, African empires preferred to expand on the basis of shared cultural values, rather than force and brutality. In detailing and evaluating the merits of African constitutionalism, Williams demonstrates (especially through the telling of the history of the Kingdom of Kuba) how the erosion of traditional African democracy and devolution into autocracy helped speed up the destruction of African civilizations. The point here is that this erosion was something that Africans themselves caused, and could have prevented. I absolutely loved the analysis of the history of the Mossi Kingdoms. More needs to be said about this great collection of states, including how they resisted foreign imposition by centering African systems and essentially prohibiting non-African presence and influence (including the religions of Islam and Christianity).
Overall, Williams primary contention is that African people have largely been unable to prevent their subjugation by non-African people because of one principal reason: disunity. African imperialism, notwithstanding its successes and great achievements, could not solve the disunity problem because, according to Williams, African constitutionalism is inherently anti-empire. Thus, many strong African states collapsed from within on their own, and non-African invaders took advantage of the situation. Ultimately, while this book sometimes loses its focus in an effort to prove that “race” and “color” preoccupation was the same 6,000 years ago as it is today, it is an invaluable piece of historical scholarship for Black people around the world.