These comments may be superseded as I understand a second edition, which I have not read, has been released.
I have little patience for authors who effect a cute and clever writing style. All the fluff wastes my time and annoys me. Lekson, or his editors, seem to think that the book will sell better if he writes in a familiar and idiosyncratic manner that inflates the book's length. But, once beyond the stylistic nonsense there's a lot of interesting information in this book. Its central premise is that Chacoan society was class stratified and that the overlords constrained the working class to build these "great houses" and nonfunctional roads as status monuments. He claims that Aztec ruins on the Animas, Chaco canyon and Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, are aligned on a north-south axis (except they aren't) and that this purported alignment is no accident. As evidence of this assertion he cites the existence of a "Great North Road" running due north from Chaco to a small ruin on Kutz Arroyo (not to Aztec). From there the road is supposed to follow the arroyo bottom northwest to Salmon ruins on the San Juan (skewing the alignment), although floods have obliterated all signs of this road segment. Salmon ruins is due south of Aztec but there's no sign of the road over the mesa between the rivers. No sign of any road south of Chaco across the Chihuahuan desert, either. Despite this imprecise alignment and lack of evidence for any roads besides the Great North Road, Lekson goes to pains to assure us that the alignment is real and intentional. Is it, and what does it matter if it is? Well, some cultures built pyramids while the Chacoan Anasazi aligned their pueblos, more or less, along lines of longitude. This is supposed to be the monumental achievement that gave the ruling class its authority. Maybe so. Who knows? And why would the people these overlords oppressed care? Why would such an alignment give these parasites their authority? Maybe being able to unleash cannibal goon squads on dissenting pueblos is how the parasitic class, if there was one, maintained power, not because they could align their outposts with the north star or their control of the trinket trade. Lekson thinks he can get inside the heads of ancient people and determine how they thought and what impressed them. I think this is arrogant and I don't buy it.
What struck me most about this book is all that Lekson leaves out. No mention of the rampant cannibalism that characterized Chacoan society. No mention of the anemia consequent to an overwhelmingly corn diet. No mention of the impact of Na-Dene speaking peoples coming down from the north during the Chacoan heyday. Lekson's dismissive treatment of the differences in pottery and architectural styles between Chaco, Aztec and Casas Grandes, which would seem to contradict his argument, I find especially weak. Another thing, when I visited Casas Grandes in the 1980s the guide said that the structures Lekson says were macaw cages, were turkey pens. I've also read that they may have been compost bins. Chihuahua is far north of the tropical range of macaws and I find it hard to believe they would have reproduced inside the adobe boxes where he claims they were bred for the archaic feather trade. I don't believe this and neither did the English speaking guy who showed people around the ruins in exchange for tips. Also, I don't believe that Lekson appreciates how much the ecology of the region has changed over the centuries, especially with the eradication of beavers and introduction of exotic bovids and equids. He's an archeologist, not an ecologist, and this fact makes some of his interpretations of the agricultural potential of various floodplains weak. There were certainly other drainages suitable for the development of canal irrigation closer to Chaco/Aztec than the Rio Casas Grandes. Thinking that these were bypassed because they didn't align with the "Chaco Meridian" is, in my opinion, silly.
So, despite Lekson's being full of himself leading to a cutsie and stilted writing style, and the weakness of his arguments, I would still recommend this book to anyone interested in the prehistory of the North American Southwest. Maybe the second edition is better.