What do you think?
Rate this book
Freudianism: A Marxist Critique
A Marxist Critique investigates Freud's theory and method, that Freud's use of "the unconscious" in psychoanalysis is questionable. The book discusses that the unconscious is an aspect of "the conscious" something like an "unofficial conscious" different from the normal, everyday "official conscious." The conscious is assumed as an "inner speech" with the properties of language, and because the unconscious is an aspect of the conscious, hence the unconscious is also linguistic in nature. Humans, according to Freud's theory, are inherently false, individualistic, asocial, existing in an ahistorical setting. The strength of the book comes from its concept of discourse that binds humans together in their social contexts of action and history through language. The book notes that the "cosmism" of Steiner's anthroposophy, Bergson's biologism, and Frued's psychobiologism and sexualism have endowed with their own features the physiognomy of the modern "Kulturmensch." In this culture, the Steinerians, the Bergsonians, and the Freudians have raised the three altars of Frued's belief―magic, instinct, and sex. Psychiatrists, psycho-analysts, psychologists, philosophers, as well as students of psychology and its related branches will find this book very challenging.
170 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1927
About the author
Valentin Voloshinov
9 books11 followersValentin Nikolaevich Voloshinov was a Russian Soviet linguist, whose work has been influential in the field of literary theory and Marxist theory of ideology.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
August 15, 2017
All that is beautiful is defenceless, and psychoanalysis the most of all: its unscientific nature, dubious therapeutic success and multitude of quack-adherents make its acknowledgment in the twenty-first century - with the exception of that within academia - a risible matter. Usually, in this day and age the art comes under attack from Popperian positivists who bemoan its subjective and seemingly arbitrary proceedings, or common-sense middle-of-the-road .
Valentin Voloshinov, however, was a Russian marxist and a contemporary of Freud's. Frustrated with psychoanalysis's (or, as he termed the movement he deemed a cult, Freudianism) ahistoricism and focus on the individual, he sought to apply to it the blunt knife of 'scientific' orthodox marxism and - at least partly - redeem Freud's theories by subsuming them under socio-linguistics. What he ended up with, however, was an early (post)structuralist critique of psychology.
Of the book's many pages, surprisingly few are dedicated to engaging with psycho-analysis; the first half merely a faithful reproduction of the theory as it existed at the time, the last quarter a separate analysis of art as a social formula. It’s only in part III that Voloshinov fires the cannons he’s been holding levelled for a while: psychoanalysis exhibits a bias towards consciousness that makes it unable to grasp the unconscious unless as the former’s dark twin in the same way that its presentist bias causes it to analyse the past as a function of the present and its psychological bias the body as one of the mind. Instead, Voloshinov proposes that what Freud calls the id does not exist but is actually the symptom of warring ideologies; what comes from ‘below’ (from the masses, the renegades, the avant-garde) strives to conquer the established (the ruling ideology); the id, then, is not the childishly spontaneous (which in any case is a presentist hypostatization) nor the sexual (which is only a symptom of this transitory societal period; a weakening of social norms causes the inhabitants previously covered by it to crawl back to the smallest tenable ‘safe’ unit, ie the couple) but rather a budding new order. The popularity of the psychoanalytical phenomenon he analogously reads as the throes of the decaying bourgeois order, and its results are likewise historically contingent: Voloshinov perspicaciously points out that the ancient Greeks in no way faced the hangups regarding homosexuality so central to our contemporary oedipal triangle,
The places Voloshinov shines the strongest, however, is where he folds back the psychoanalytical into the linguistic, which he in turn sees as a purely social phenomenon – in other words, fitting the ‘individualist’ psychoanalysis within the framework of linguistic structuralism. This trend he continues in his treatise on the function of art; every expression is, implicitly, a nodal structure with space for three variables (the speaker, the listener and the ‘hero’, or subject) which, even when uttered in isolation, fully determine the possibilities of the utterance. Linguistics itself, taken as synchronic research, he sees as a nonsensical abstraction: language is social and only social and should be understood as such. Likewise, there is nothing beyond the language which analysands use to describe their psychological predicaments: anticipating Derrida by half a century, Voloshinov declared language and semiotics to be synonymous. Neither the unconscious, bodily functions nor dreams are ‘tethered’ signs with fixed psychoanalytical signified contents; all results derived from an analytical session amount to no more than commentary on commentary on nothing.
Precisely this hugely forward-thinking thrust of Voloshinov's critique is the unstable fuel that both grants it its insight and belches out smokescreens. Determined to fit his structuralism into a materialist mold, the author fails to apply his proto-Derridean critique to his own alternative 'objective' psychoanalysis: while the discovery of the exact chemical makeup behind psychological impulses and reactions would provide one with the structural/nodal makeup of semiosis, the 'parallel' semiotic/linguistic act accompanying it is still separated from it by an unbridgeable explanatory gap. The idea of an 'objective' material study of meaning takes one step in the direction of structuralism, but immediately falls into the clutches of its poststructuralist critics. Voloshinov's simultaneous insistence on the social/conventional nature of meaning serves to salvage the greater share of his alternative explanation of psychological phenomena, but in the absence of any re-analysis of Freud's cases it is difficult to gauge - for example - how Voloshinov's concepts of 'official and unofficial inner voice' differ from the former's 'conscious and unconscious'. Voloshinov is at his weakest when articulating his ideological reading of language-as-a-social-function: despite the valid assertion that hierarchy and standing determine language and discourse, his comments on the psychological value of intonation and gesticulation seem mired in the naive psychologization he accuses Freud of.
Finally, mention must be made of the excellent and insightful final chapter by Neal H. Bruss, in which the tally is made of Freud's legacy in the light of Voloshinov's criticisms. Coming out three years before Society and its Discontents, Freudianism could not anticipate how much Freud himself would develop a broader social theory, going beyond the solipsistically individualist. Jacques Lacan would eventually take it upon himself to rearticulate the social as a function of linguistics - the inverse of Voloshinov's project - and in doing so overruled many semiotic flaws the latter found in the former's theories. Lastly, Bruss himself stresses the Saussurean nature of the freudian mechanisms of displacement and condensation, finding in them a possible answer to the questions raised by Voloshinov's structuralist predisposition.
In summary then, Freudianism is in spite of its discursively obsolete nature a fascinating read in which linguistics infect psychology and turn it inside-out. Recommended to those interested in either.
Strangely, marxism itself scarcely features, and if it weren't for Voloshinov's linking of class ideology with 'the inner dialogue', Verso's subtitle would be quite misleading.
Valentin Voloshinov, however, was a Russian marxist and a contemporary of Freud's. Frustrated with psychoanalysis's (or, as he termed the movement he deemed a cult, Freudianism) ahistoricism and focus on the individual, he sought to apply to it the blunt knife of 'scientific' orthodox marxism and - at least partly - redeem Freud's theories by subsuming them under socio-linguistics. What he ended up with, however, was an early (post)structuralist critique of psychology.
Of the book's many pages, surprisingly few are dedicated to engaging with psycho-analysis; the first half merely a faithful reproduction of the theory as it existed at the time, the last quarter a separate analysis of art as a social formula. It’s only in part III that Voloshinov fires the cannons he’s been holding levelled for a while: psychoanalysis exhibits a bias towards consciousness that makes it unable to grasp the unconscious unless as the former’s dark twin in the same way that its presentist bias causes it to analyse the past as a function of the present and its psychological bias the body as one of the mind. Instead, Voloshinov proposes that what Freud calls the id does not exist but is actually the symptom of warring ideologies; what comes from ‘below’ (from the masses, the renegades, the avant-garde) strives to conquer the established (the ruling ideology); the id, then, is not the childishly spontaneous (which in any case is a presentist hypostatization) nor the sexual (which is only a symptom of this transitory societal period; a weakening of social norms causes the inhabitants previously covered by it to crawl back to the smallest tenable ‘safe’ unit, ie the couple) but rather a budding new order. The popularity of the psychoanalytical phenomenon he analogously reads as the throes of the decaying bourgeois order, and its results are likewise historically contingent: Voloshinov perspicaciously points out that the ancient Greeks in no way faced the hangups regarding homosexuality so central to our contemporary oedipal triangle,
The places Voloshinov shines the strongest, however, is where he folds back the psychoanalytical into the linguistic, which he in turn sees as a purely social phenomenon – in other words, fitting the ‘individualist’ psychoanalysis within the framework of linguistic structuralism. This trend he continues in his treatise on the function of art; every expression is, implicitly, a nodal structure with space for three variables (the speaker, the listener and the ‘hero’, or subject) which, even when uttered in isolation, fully determine the possibilities of the utterance. Linguistics itself, taken as synchronic research, he sees as a nonsensical abstraction: language is social and only social and should be understood as such. Likewise, there is nothing beyond the language which analysands use to describe their psychological predicaments: anticipating Derrida by half a century, Voloshinov declared language and semiotics to be synonymous. Neither the unconscious, bodily functions nor dreams are ‘tethered’ signs with fixed psychoanalytical signified contents; all results derived from an analytical session amount to no more than commentary on commentary on nothing.
Precisely this hugely forward-thinking thrust of Voloshinov's critique is the unstable fuel that both grants it its insight and belches out smokescreens. Determined to fit his structuralism into a materialist mold, the author fails to apply his proto-Derridean critique to his own alternative 'objective' psychoanalysis: while the discovery of the exact chemical makeup behind psychological impulses and reactions would provide one with the structural/nodal makeup of semiosis, the 'parallel' semiotic/linguistic act accompanying it is still separated from it by an unbridgeable explanatory gap. The idea of an 'objective' material study of meaning takes one step in the direction of structuralism, but immediately falls into the clutches of its poststructuralist critics. Voloshinov's simultaneous insistence on the social/conventional nature of meaning serves to salvage the greater share of his alternative explanation of psychological phenomena, but in the absence of any re-analysis of Freud's cases it is difficult to gauge - for example - how Voloshinov's concepts of 'official and unofficial inner voice' differ from the former's 'conscious and unconscious'. Voloshinov is at his weakest when articulating his ideological reading of language-as-a-social-function: despite the valid assertion that hierarchy and standing determine language and discourse, his comments on the psychological value of intonation and gesticulation seem mired in the naive psychologization he accuses Freud of.
Finally, mention must be made of the excellent and insightful final chapter by Neal H. Bruss, in which the tally is made of Freud's legacy in the light of Voloshinov's criticisms. Coming out three years before Society and its Discontents, Freudianism could not anticipate how much Freud himself would develop a broader social theory, going beyond the solipsistically individualist. Jacques Lacan would eventually take it upon himself to rearticulate the social as a function of linguistics - the inverse of Voloshinov's project - and in doing so overruled many semiotic flaws the latter found in the former's theories. Lastly, Bruss himself stresses the Saussurean nature of the freudian mechanisms of displacement and condensation, finding in them a possible answer to the questions raised by Voloshinov's structuralist predisposition.
In summary then, Freudianism is in spite of its discursively obsolete nature a fascinating read in which linguistics infect psychology and turn it inside-out. Recommended to those interested in either.
Strangely, marxism itself scarcely features, and if it weren't for Voloshinov's linking of class ideology with 'the inner dialogue', Verso's subtitle would be quite misleading.
September 1, 2023
Voloshinov rejects Freudianism with its concepts of the unconscious, repression, and childhood sexuality. He ties consciousness to speech, action, and historical sociology.
February 28, 2026
In his 1927 work Freudianism: A Critical Sketch, V. N. Voloshinov provides an outstanding Marxist critique of psychoanalysis. He argues that what Freud identifies as the "unconscious" is actually a form of "unofficial consciousness"—a collection of social motives that cannot find expression in the dominant ideology of a given (bourgeois) society.
Below is a summary of each chapter and ten key insights/ramifications from each.
Part I: Freudianism and Modern Trends in Philosophy and Psychology
1: The Basic Ideological Motif of Freudianism
Summary: Voloshinov situates Freudianism within the crisis of bourgeois culture. He argues that Freud’s focus on the biological, "natural" man is an attempt to find a stable foundation outside of social and historical reality.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
Ideological Reflex: Freudianism reflects the disintegration of the bourgeois individual.
* Biological Escape: Psychoanalysis attempts to replace social history with biological "instincts".
* Fear of History: The focus on the eternal "unconscious" masks a fear of social change.
* The Sexual Motif: The elevation of sex to a primary mover is a symptom of social decline.
* A-historicism: Freud treats the 20th-century bourgeois family as a universal, eternal human condition.
* Subjectivism: Psychoanalysis is the "last word" in subjective psychology, turning away from the external world.
* Class Context: Freud’s patients represent a specific class whose social ties have weakened.
* The "Natural" Man: Freud’s "man" is an abstract creature stripped of social relations.
* Methodological Individualism: It falsely assumes the psyche can be understood in isolation from the collective.
* Cultural Pessimism: The theory suggests that civilization is inherently and eternally repressive.
Chapter 2: Two Trends in Modern Psychology
Summary: This chapter examines the conflict between "explanatory" psychology (based on physiological causes) and "descriptive" psychology (based on subjective meaning). Voloshinov argues that Freud attempts to bridge these but fails by remaining trapped in subjectivity.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The Crisis of Psychology: The discipline is split between "objective" physiology and "subjective" introspection.
* Freud's Hybridity: Freud tries to give subjective "meanings" the force of physical "causes."
* Pseudo-Biology: Terms like "libido" are used to give psychological concepts a veneer of biological science.
* The Myth of the Inner: Psychology falsely assumes a private "inner world" separate from social signs.
* Failure of Introspection: Subjective methods cannot provide a truly objective science of the mind.
* Objective Behavior: Voloshinov advocates for studying behavior in its social and natural environment.
* The Role of Language: Psychology ignores that the "inner" is actually made of "inner speech."
* Mechanical Causality: Freud treats thoughts as if they were physical objects pushing against one another.
* Scientific Pretense: Psychoanalysis uses medical terminology to justify ideological claims.
* The Need for Synthesis: A valid psychology must integrate the individual into the social whole.
Part II: An Exposition of Freudianism
Chapter 3: The Unconscious and the Dynamics of the Psyche
Summary: Voloshinov outlines Freud’s topographic model (Unconscious, Preconscious, Conscious) and the dynamics of repression.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The Censor: The "censor" acts as a border guard between mental provinces.
* Dynamic Struggle: The psyche is viewed as a constant battleground of forces.
* Repression: Thoughts are not forgotten but "pushed back" by social or moral pressure.
* The Unconscious as Alien: Freud treats the unconscious as a "foreign body" within the self.
* Psychical Continuity: Nothing in the mind is accidental; every slip has a "meaning."
* Energy Model: The psyche is treated like a hydraulic system of energy (libido).
* Resistance: The ego protects itself by refusing to acknowledge certain truths.
* Determinism: Every mental event is determined by prior (mostly unconscious) causes.
* Latent vs. Manifest: There is always a hidden "true" meaning behind the "surface" thought.
* The Ego’s Weakness: The conscious mind is merely the "tip of the iceberg."
Chapter 4: The Content of the Unconscious
Summary: This chapter details the Oedipus complex and the infantile roots of adult neurosis.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Infantile Sexuality: Freud claims sexuality begins at birth, not puberty.
* The Oedipus Complex: The child’s first social relation is defined by sexual desire and rivalry.
* Universal Trauma: Development is seen as a series of inevitable traumatic stages (oral, anal, phallic).
* The Family as Microcosm: The family is the sole crucible of the human soul.
* Fixation: Adults are "haunted" by unresolved childhood desires.
* The Primal Scene: Early observations of parents shape the entire future psyche.
* Biology as Fate: Gender and family structure are treated as biological imperatives.
* Sublimation: Higher culture is merely redirected sexual energy.
* Ambivalence: Love and hate are viewed as inseparable (the "Oedipal" mix).
* Narcissism: The ego starts in a state of self-absorption before moving to objects.
Chapter 5: The Psychoanalytical Method
Summary: Voloshinov describes the clinical techniques of free association and dream interpretation.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Free Association: The patient must suspend "judgment" and speak everything that comes to mind.
* Dream Work: The processes of condensation and displacement transform latent thoughts into dreams.
* The Role of the Analyst: The analyst acts as a "second censor" or a "mirror".
* Transference: The patient projects childhood feelings onto the doctor.
* Interpretation as Power: The analyst holds the "key" to the patient's truth.
* The Symbolic Code: Freud creates a fixed dictionary of symbols (snakes, houses, etc.).
* Symptom as Language: A physical symptom is a "converted" psychological message.
* Healing through Speech: Bringing the unconscious into words is the path to "cure."
* The "Session" as Recapitulation: The analysis recreates the patient's history.
* Rationalization: Patients often create false "logical" stories to hide their real motives.
Chapter 6: Freudian Philosophy of Culture
Summary: This chapter examines Freud’s application of psychoanalysis to society, religion, and art (e.g., Totem and Taboo).
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Culture as Repression: Civilization is built on the denial of instincts.
* The Primal Father: Society begins with a literal or symbolic murder of the father.
* Religion as Neurosis: God is a projected, "exalted" father figure.
* Art as Fantasy: Art is a "socially acceptable" way to fulfill forbidden wishes.
* The Totem: Social bonds are formed through shared guilt.
* Universal Guilt: Human history is driven by the inherited guilt of the Oedipal crime.
* Discontent: The more advanced a culture, the more unhappy its members must be.
* Social Control: Law and morality are internalized "superegos."
* War and Aggression: The "death drive" (Thanatos) explains human destructiveness.
* Myth as Dream: Myths are the "collective dreams" of a people.
Part III: A Critical Analysis of Freudianism
Chapter 7: Freudianism as a Variant of Subjective Psychology
Summary: Voloshinov argues that Freud’s "unconscious" is not biological but is actually made of words and signs.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Semiotic Nature: The unconscious is not "raw energy" but a system of signs.
* Verbal Form: Everything Freud calls "mental" is actually "inner speech."
* Subjectivity Trap: Freud stays within the individual’s head instead of looking at social interaction.
* Language of the Unconscious: The unconscious "speaks" through slips and dreams.
* Critique of Libido: Libido is a "mythological" term, not a scientific one.
* Inter-individual Basis: The "psyche" only exists in the space between people.
* The Sign as Bridge: The sign is the material link between the individual and society.
* The Illusion of Privacy: Even our most private thoughts are structured by shared language.
* Methodological Error: You cannot explain a social phenomenon (like culture) using individual psychology.
* The "Inner" is "Outer": What we think is deep inside is actually a reflection of our social environment.
Chapter 8: The Dynamics of the Psyche as a Struggle of Ideological Motives
Summary: Voloshinov redefines Freud's "struggle of forces" as a struggle between different voices or social motives.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The "Censor" as Social: The "censor" is not a biological filter but the "official" social voice.
* Unofficial Consciousness: The unconscious is simply "unofficial" thoughts that the social group forbids.
* Internal Dialogue: The psyche is a dialogue (or argument) between different social positions.
* Motive vs. Force: What Freud calls "forces" are actually "motives" that can be put into words.
* Social Conflict: Inner conflict is a reflection of the conflicts in the social world.
* The "We-experience": Individual consciousness is based on a "we" (social group).
* Levels of Clarity: Some thoughts are "clear" because they are socially supported; others are "vague" because they are suppressed.
* Class Motives: Different classes have different "official" and "unofficial" consciousnesses.
* The Verbalized Psyche: Only that which can be verbalized becomes a conscious motive.
* Repression as Silence: To repress a thought is to "de-voice" it socially.
Chapter 9: The Content of Consciousness as Ideology
Summary: Voloshinov concludes that consciousness is a "social-ideological fact". He argues that Freud’s theory is itself an ideology of a dying class.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Consciousness is Social: There is no "private" consciousness; it is all "ideology."
* Behavioral Ideology: Everyday speech and gestures are the "raw material" of formal ideology.
* The "Death" of the Individual: The isolated individual is a fiction; we are nodes in a social network.
* Freudianism as Symptom: The theory is a symptom of the very "neurosis" (class decline) it tries to treat.
* The Sexualization of Life: Over-emphasizing sex is a way to avoid economic and political reality.
* Materialist Psychology: A true psychology must be based on the laws of social development.
* The Sign as Arena: The "word" is the arena where social struggle takes place.
* Ideological Breadth: Small slips and grand philosophies are on the same continuum of "signs."
* Transformation of the Self: To change the self, one must change the social environment.
* Marxist Synthesis: Psychology must become a branch of the science of ideologies.
Appendices
Appendix I: Discourse in Life and Discourse in Art
Summary: Voloshinov explores how "extra-verbal context" (the social situation) gives meaning to speech.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The "Said" and "Unsaid": Meaning depends on what both speaker and listener already know.
* Social Evaluation: Every word carries a "judgment" or "tone" from the community.
* The Enthymeme: Speech is often an "abbreviated" argument where the premises are shared social values.
* Artistic Form: Art is a "social event" between the author, the hero, and the listener.
* Style as Relationship: Style is the expression of the social bond between speaker and audience.
* The Hero: In art, the "hero" is a social entity, not just a character.
* Poetic Form: Form is a way of "evaluating" the content from a social perspective.
* Sociological Poetics: Literature should be studied as a social interaction, not just text.
* The Chorus: The "audience" is always an implicit "chorus" in any work of art.
* Context is King: A single word ("Well!") can mean anything depending on the social situation.
Appendix II: Voloshinov and the Structure of Language in Freudianism
Summary: This appendix (likely an editor's note or related essay) discusses the modern relevance of Voloshinov’s semiotic approach to Freud.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Structuralist Link: Voloshinov anticipated modern structuralist readings of Freud (like Lacan).
* The "Talking Cure": Confirms that psychoanalysis is entirely a "linguistic" process.
* Dialogue: Re-emphasizes that the psyche is a "dialogue" between signs.
* Modern Semiotics: Links Voloshinov to the Tartu-Moscow school of semiotics.
* Intertextuality: The psyche is an "intertext" of social discourses.
* Against Biological Reduction: Reinforces the argument that human mind cannot be reduced to brain chemistry or animal instinct.
* The Politics of the Sign: Every sign is a site of political contestation.
* Critique of Lacan: While similar to Lacan, Voloshinov is more grounded in social rather than symbolic logic.
* Historical Materialism: The psyche changes as the modes of production and social communication change.
* Enduring Relevance: His critique of the "individualist" psyche remains a challenge to modern neoliberal psychology.
Voloshinov is an outstanding example of the caliber of intellectuals won to Bolshevism before Thermidor and the start of the crimes of Cain-Stalin.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TJ3u...
Jay
28 February 2026
Below is a summary of each chapter and ten key insights/ramifications from each.
Part I: Freudianism and Modern Trends in Philosophy and Psychology
1: The Basic Ideological Motif of Freudianism
Summary: Voloshinov situates Freudianism within the crisis of bourgeois culture. He argues that Freud’s focus on the biological, "natural" man is an attempt to find a stable foundation outside of social and historical reality.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
Ideological Reflex: Freudianism reflects the disintegration of the bourgeois individual.
* Biological Escape: Psychoanalysis attempts to replace social history with biological "instincts".
* Fear of History: The focus on the eternal "unconscious" masks a fear of social change.
* The Sexual Motif: The elevation of sex to a primary mover is a symptom of social decline.
* A-historicism: Freud treats the 20th-century bourgeois family as a universal, eternal human condition.
* Subjectivism: Psychoanalysis is the "last word" in subjective psychology, turning away from the external world.
* Class Context: Freud’s patients represent a specific class whose social ties have weakened.
* The "Natural" Man: Freud’s "man" is an abstract creature stripped of social relations.
* Methodological Individualism: It falsely assumes the psyche can be understood in isolation from the collective.
* Cultural Pessimism: The theory suggests that civilization is inherently and eternally repressive.
Chapter 2: Two Trends in Modern Psychology
Summary: This chapter examines the conflict between "explanatory" psychology (based on physiological causes) and "descriptive" psychology (based on subjective meaning). Voloshinov argues that Freud attempts to bridge these but fails by remaining trapped in subjectivity.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The Crisis of Psychology: The discipline is split between "objective" physiology and "subjective" introspection.
* Freud's Hybridity: Freud tries to give subjective "meanings" the force of physical "causes."
* Pseudo-Biology: Terms like "libido" are used to give psychological concepts a veneer of biological science.
* The Myth of the Inner: Psychology falsely assumes a private "inner world" separate from social signs.
* Failure of Introspection: Subjective methods cannot provide a truly objective science of the mind.
* Objective Behavior: Voloshinov advocates for studying behavior in its social and natural environment.
* The Role of Language: Psychology ignores that the "inner" is actually made of "inner speech."
* Mechanical Causality: Freud treats thoughts as if they were physical objects pushing against one another.
* Scientific Pretense: Psychoanalysis uses medical terminology to justify ideological claims.
* The Need for Synthesis: A valid psychology must integrate the individual into the social whole.
Part II: An Exposition of Freudianism
Chapter 3: The Unconscious and the Dynamics of the Psyche
Summary: Voloshinov outlines Freud’s topographic model (Unconscious, Preconscious, Conscious) and the dynamics of repression.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The Censor: The "censor" acts as a border guard between mental provinces.
* Dynamic Struggle: The psyche is viewed as a constant battleground of forces.
* Repression: Thoughts are not forgotten but "pushed back" by social or moral pressure.
* The Unconscious as Alien: Freud treats the unconscious as a "foreign body" within the self.
* Psychical Continuity: Nothing in the mind is accidental; every slip has a "meaning."
* Energy Model: The psyche is treated like a hydraulic system of energy (libido).
* Resistance: The ego protects itself by refusing to acknowledge certain truths.
* Determinism: Every mental event is determined by prior (mostly unconscious) causes.
* Latent vs. Manifest: There is always a hidden "true" meaning behind the "surface" thought.
* The Ego’s Weakness: The conscious mind is merely the "tip of the iceberg."
Chapter 4: The Content of the Unconscious
Summary: This chapter details the Oedipus complex and the infantile roots of adult neurosis.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Infantile Sexuality: Freud claims sexuality begins at birth, not puberty.
* The Oedipus Complex: The child’s first social relation is defined by sexual desire and rivalry.
* Universal Trauma: Development is seen as a series of inevitable traumatic stages (oral, anal, phallic).
* The Family as Microcosm: The family is the sole crucible of the human soul.
* Fixation: Adults are "haunted" by unresolved childhood desires.
* The Primal Scene: Early observations of parents shape the entire future psyche.
* Biology as Fate: Gender and family structure are treated as biological imperatives.
* Sublimation: Higher culture is merely redirected sexual energy.
* Ambivalence: Love and hate are viewed as inseparable (the "Oedipal" mix).
* Narcissism: The ego starts in a state of self-absorption before moving to objects.
Chapter 5: The Psychoanalytical Method
Summary: Voloshinov describes the clinical techniques of free association and dream interpretation.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Free Association: The patient must suspend "judgment" and speak everything that comes to mind.
* Dream Work: The processes of condensation and displacement transform latent thoughts into dreams.
* The Role of the Analyst: The analyst acts as a "second censor" or a "mirror".
* Transference: The patient projects childhood feelings onto the doctor.
* Interpretation as Power: The analyst holds the "key" to the patient's truth.
* The Symbolic Code: Freud creates a fixed dictionary of symbols (snakes, houses, etc.).
* Symptom as Language: A physical symptom is a "converted" psychological message.
* Healing through Speech: Bringing the unconscious into words is the path to "cure."
* The "Session" as Recapitulation: The analysis recreates the patient's history.
* Rationalization: Patients often create false "logical" stories to hide their real motives.
Chapter 6: Freudian Philosophy of Culture
Summary: This chapter examines Freud’s application of psychoanalysis to society, religion, and art (e.g., Totem and Taboo).
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Culture as Repression: Civilization is built on the denial of instincts.
* The Primal Father: Society begins with a literal or symbolic murder of the father.
* Religion as Neurosis: God is a projected, "exalted" father figure.
* Art as Fantasy: Art is a "socially acceptable" way to fulfill forbidden wishes.
* The Totem: Social bonds are formed through shared guilt.
* Universal Guilt: Human history is driven by the inherited guilt of the Oedipal crime.
* Discontent: The more advanced a culture, the more unhappy its members must be.
* Social Control: Law and morality are internalized "superegos."
* War and Aggression: The "death drive" (Thanatos) explains human destructiveness.
* Myth as Dream: Myths are the "collective dreams" of a people.
Part III: A Critical Analysis of Freudianism
Chapter 7: Freudianism as a Variant of Subjective Psychology
Summary: Voloshinov argues that Freud’s "unconscious" is not biological but is actually made of words and signs.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Semiotic Nature: The unconscious is not "raw energy" but a system of signs.
* Verbal Form: Everything Freud calls "mental" is actually "inner speech."
* Subjectivity Trap: Freud stays within the individual’s head instead of looking at social interaction.
* Language of the Unconscious: The unconscious "speaks" through slips and dreams.
* Critique of Libido: Libido is a "mythological" term, not a scientific one.
* Inter-individual Basis: The "psyche" only exists in the space between people.
* The Sign as Bridge: The sign is the material link between the individual and society.
* The Illusion of Privacy: Even our most private thoughts are structured by shared language.
* Methodological Error: You cannot explain a social phenomenon (like culture) using individual psychology.
* The "Inner" is "Outer": What we think is deep inside is actually a reflection of our social environment.
Chapter 8: The Dynamics of the Psyche as a Struggle of Ideological Motives
Summary: Voloshinov redefines Freud's "struggle of forces" as a struggle between different voices or social motives.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The "Censor" as Social: The "censor" is not a biological filter but the "official" social voice.
* Unofficial Consciousness: The unconscious is simply "unofficial" thoughts that the social group forbids.
* Internal Dialogue: The psyche is a dialogue (or argument) between different social positions.
* Motive vs. Force: What Freud calls "forces" are actually "motives" that can be put into words.
* Social Conflict: Inner conflict is a reflection of the conflicts in the social world.
* The "We-experience": Individual consciousness is based on a "we" (social group).
* Levels of Clarity: Some thoughts are "clear" because they are socially supported; others are "vague" because they are suppressed.
* Class Motives: Different classes have different "official" and "unofficial" consciousnesses.
* The Verbalized Psyche: Only that which can be verbalized becomes a conscious motive.
* Repression as Silence: To repress a thought is to "de-voice" it socially.
Chapter 9: The Content of Consciousness as Ideology
Summary: Voloshinov concludes that consciousness is a "social-ideological fact". He argues that Freud’s theory is itself an ideology of a dying class.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Consciousness is Social: There is no "private" consciousness; it is all "ideology."
* Behavioral Ideology: Everyday speech and gestures are the "raw material" of formal ideology.
* The "Death" of the Individual: The isolated individual is a fiction; we are nodes in a social network.
* Freudianism as Symptom: The theory is a symptom of the very "neurosis" (class decline) it tries to treat.
* The Sexualization of Life: Over-emphasizing sex is a way to avoid economic and political reality.
* Materialist Psychology: A true psychology must be based on the laws of social development.
* The Sign as Arena: The "word" is the arena where social struggle takes place.
* Ideological Breadth: Small slips and grand philosophies are on the same continuum of "signs."
* Transformation of the Self: To change the self, one must change the social environment.
* Marxist Synthesis: Psychology must become a branch of the science of ideologies.
Appendices
Appendix I: Discourse in Life and Discourse in Art
Summary: Voloshinov explores how "extra-verbal context" (the social situation) gives meaning to speech.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* The "Said" and "Unsaid": Meaning depends on what both speaker and listener already know.
* Social Evaluation: Every word carries a "judgment" or "tone" from the community.
* The Enthymeme: Speech is often an "abbreviated" argument where the premises are shared social values.
* Artistic Form: Art is a "social event" between the author, the hero, and the listener.
* Style as Relationship: Style is the expression of the social bond between speaker and audience.
* The Hero: In art, the "hero" is a social entity, not just a character.
* Poetic Form: Form is a way of "evaluating" the content from a social perspective.
* Sociological Poetics: Literature should be studied as a social interaction, not just text.
* The Chorus: The "audience" is always an implicit "chorus" in any work of art.
* Context is King: A single word ("Well!") can mean anything depending on the social situation.
Appendix II: Voloshinov and the Structure of Language in Freudianism
Summary: This appendix (likely an editor's note or related essay) discusses the modern relevance of Voloshinov’s semiotic approach to Freud.
10 Insights/Ramifications:
* Structuralist Link: Voloshinov anticipated modern structuralist readings of Freud (like Lacan).
* The "Talking Cure": Confirms that psychoanalysis is entirely a "linguistic" process.
* Dialogue: Re-emphasizes that the psyche is a "dialogue" between signs.
* Modern Semiotics: Links Voloshinov to the Tartu-Moscow school of semiotics.
* Intertextuality: The psyche is an "intertext" of social discourses.
* Against Biological Reduction: Reinforces the argument that human mind cannot be reduced to brain chemistry or animal instinct.
* The Politics of the Sign: Every sign is a site of political contestation.
* Critique of Lacan: While similar to Lacan, Voloshinov is more grounded in social rather than symbolic logic.
* Historical Materialism: The psyche changes as the modes of production and social communication change.
* Enduring Relevance: His critique of the "individualist" psyche remains a challenge to modern neoliberal psychology.
Voloshinov is an outstanding example of the caliber of intellectuals won to Bolshevism before Thermidor and the start of the crimes of Cain-Stalin.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TJ3u...
Jay
28 February 2026
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
June 16, 2022
This book gives you a glimpse of post-revolution yet pre-Stalin Russia as a true place where history could have been made. A ghost of a brighter future that never came is present all through this very pointed albeit somewhat flawed (admitted to even in the notes) Marxist critique of Freud. The great content of the book aside it represents to me - like Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin or Klutsis' Constructivism - a current of truly revolutionary thought in a time where we are taught only repression and ideological dogmatism existed in the USSR.
January 27, 2020
i recall finding this interpretation of freud unpersuasive, years ago.
November 27, 2025
Voloshinov is an acute thinker, writes lucidly and straightforwardly, and here he is presenting a deconstruction of Freudianism for his times. Situating Freud’s work in the 1920s and 1930s, he remarks that Freud never took an explicit stance in the debate between subjectivist and objectivist psychology. Having examined Freud’s discovery of the unconscious, Voloshinov argues that in order to summon the unconscious one always needs language, which is indisputably social, thus undermining the underlying individualism of Freud’s approach as a whole.
The fact that one could never make the psychical coincide with consciousness places Freud in a strange position when it comes to the materiality of the unconscious – for instance how can erogenous zones function? How does Freud explain psychophysical causality or parallelism – one of the main controversies of his generation? If introspection is only possible from a conscious point of view, what of it when it comes to accessing the unconscious? For Voloshinov, ‘Freud’s whole psychological construct is based fundamentally on human verbal utterances; it is nothing but a special kind of interpretation of utterances […] constructed in the conscious sphere of the psyche.’ (p. 122)
Although he mistrusts the surface motives of consciousness, Freud tries to go deeper, but he does not look for the physiological or social roots of utterances; he is always looking inside the individual, rather than around him. He never ‘relinquishes introspection as the sole method of authenticating the reality of psychical events’.
Eventually, Voloshinov resolves to relegate Freudianism to the camp of subjective psychology. The ‘rift’ between the inner-subjective and the material remains undisturbed by Freud’s innovative notion of the unconscious (p.111). So, psychology of consciousness and psychoanalysis are the same in that respect.
By contrast, Voloshinov tries to introduce this social aspect that remains neglected by both psychology of consciousness and psychoanalysis. This social aspect is expressed by means of language and it points to an externality of the utterance, which is ‘the product of the interaction between speakers and the product of the broader context of the whole complex social situation in which the utterance emerges’ (p.126).
Voloshinov here describes discourse as a ‘scenario’, one that necessarily transcends the individual psyche and within which the patient’s utterance finds its place. For Voloshinov, Freud wrongly projects the dynamics of interrelationships between two people onto the individual psyche. He writes that the unconscious ‘stands in opposition not to the individual conscious of the patient but, primarily, to the doctor, his requirements and his views. “Resistance” is likewise primarily resistance to the doctor, to the listener, to the other person generally’ (p. 128).
The fact that, at all stages, the route to human consciousness operates through language is evidence of its transindividual or social being. Voloshinov accuses Freud of exaggerating the role of the human private life, hypostatising the sexual pair as a sort of ‘social minimum’, turning the sexual into a ‘surrogate for the social’ (p. 147).
An interesting and enjoyable criticism of Freudianism from a precursor of structuralism.
The fact that one could never make the psychical coincide with consciousness places Freud in a strange position when it comes to the materiality of the unconscious – for instance how can erogenous zones function? How does Freud explain psychophysical causality or parallelism – one of the main controversies of his generation? If introspection is only possible from a conscious point of view, what of it when it comes to accessing the unconscious? For Voloshinov, ‘Freud’s whole psychological construct is based fundamentally on human verbal utterances; it is nothing but a special kind of interpretation of utterances […] constructed in the conscious sphere of the psyche.’ (p. 122)
Although he mistrusts the surface motives of consciousness, Freud tries to go deeper, but he does not look for the physiological or social roots of utterances; he is always looking inside the individual, rather than around him. He never ‘relinquishes introspection as the sole method of authenticating the reality of psychical events’.
Eventually, Voloshinov resolves to relegate Freudianism to the camp of subjective psychology. The ‘rift’ between the inner-subjective and the material remains undisturbed by Freud’s innovative notion of the unconscious (p.111). So, psychology of consciousness and psychoanalysis are the same in that respect.
By contrast, Voloshinov tries to introduce this social aspect that remains neglected by both psychology of consciousness and psychoanalysis. This social aspect is expressed by means of language and it points to an externality of the utterance, which is ‘the product of the interaction between speakers and the product of the broader context of the whole complex social situation in which the utterance emerges’ (p.126).
Voloshinov here describes discourse as a ‘scenario’, one that necessarily transcends the individual psyche and within which the patient’s utterance finds its place. For Voloshinov, Freud wrongly projects the dynamics of interrelationships between two people onto the individual psyche. He writes that the unconscious ‘stands in opposition not to the individual conscious of the patient but, primarily, to the doctor, his requirements and his views. “Resistance” is likewise primarily resistance to the doctor, to the listener, to the other person generally’ (p. 128).
The fact that, at all stages, the route to human consciousness operates through language is evidence of its transindividual or social being. Voloshinov accuses Freud of exaggerating the role of the human private life, hypostatising the sexual pair as a sort of ‘social minimum’, turning the sexual into a ‘surrogate for the social’ (p. 147).
An interesting and enjoyable criticism of Freudianism from a precursor of structuralism.
April 2, 2024
This short book succeeds masterfully at what it sets out to do—not to synthesize two bodies of literature, nor to propose any radically new scientific method. Rather, it has two simple goals: summarizing the key concepts of Freudian Psychoanalysis in simple language; and critiquing those concepts from a Marxist perspective. Importantly, Voloshinov writes before Freud’s work even came to a close, and in the very shadow of the USSR’s formation. The benefit of hindsight we have today regarding both Psychoanalysis and Marxism wasn’t available to Voloshinov, and this isn’t so much a hindrance to his critique as it is a strength. Voloshinov’s historical context allows him to elucidate very clearly what he witnessed in the popularization of Freudian psychology in the early twentieth century: a pseudoscientific offshoot of subjective psychology.
The structure of the work is quite accessible. I think that despite Voloshinov’s clear (and honest) ideological position, a newcomer to the ideas herein can easily grasp an understanding of both Freudian Psychoanalysis and its historico-material shortcomings. However, the assumption is that one would come to this critique with at least a modest understanding of Marxism, which isn’t nearly as present as it should be. And this is really the only disappointing thing about this book.
The structure of the work is quite accessible. I think that despite Voloshinov’s clear (and honest) ideological position, a newcomer to the ideas herein can easily grasp an understanding of both Freudian Psychoanalysis and its historico-material shortcomings. However, the assumption is that one would come to this critique with at least a modest understanding of Marxism, which isn’t nearly as present as it should be. And this is really the only disappointing thing about this book.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews