I gained insight and help joining the authors in reflecting on the slow, steady nature of our journey toward wholeness and holiness as well as on the stakes involved. I love the line, “The search is for life in God’s kingdom. Hurry is the devil.” (12) I also love the comments on the relationship between care and cure. There were also multiple spots where the fruit of love is emphasized, both in the beginning and in the section on the Wesleyan traditions. To become love is my life’s aspiration and what I would long for in anyone else’s life as well. I also love the theology and experience alluded to especially in the orthodox tradition, which sees spiritual formation as purgation, illumination, and union.
I have one significant disappointment in the book and another area more personal to me where I had a life-flowing-out-of-me reaction.
As with many of our readers, the writers seem to think that global and historic Christianity is a White religion. They literally label their review of Christian spirituality “The Seven Major Traditions of Christian Spirituality.” Then they proceed to present seven White authors, who - as usual, apart from the biblical texts - site 97-99% white authors and churches and experiences in their thinking and writing. This is not merely a pet peeve of mine; it is satanic poison fruit of centuries of white supremacy in Christendom. The final four traditions all acknowledge that spiritual direction, and in some cases, even more systematic relationships around spiritual formation, are weak spots of the tradition. But they write on anyway, looking for analogies in their tradition. By 2004, it would have been easy to find an African-American or Latin American writer, for instance, who could have talked about spirituality and spiritual formation and guides within their tradition. By 2004, for instance, renewalist branches of the faith (what the book calls the Pentecostal and charismatic streams) were already majority non-white and majority non-US. You wouldn’t know that from this book.
I also had my own personally complex reactions to the chapters on the Wesleyan-holiness and Pentecostal/charismatic traditions. I’ve not been a long-term insider to either tradition, but both significantly formed the varieties of evangelical faith that were part of my formation in the 90s through five or six years ago. I found myself a little emotionally and physically reactive to some of the perfectionist legalism in one and the anti-intellectual and anti-authority bent of the other, even as I appreciated in my mind certain aspects of what the authors were saying.
Additionally, as a pastor without a denomination and without a clear traditional home, it was interesting that I found most resonance with elements of the orthodox, wesleyan, and social justice traditions - three that don’t mingle typically but all mingle in part in me.
And lastly, before the quotations, glad for the attention to ethics in this book. All pastors and spiritual directors could learn a little more from the therapeutic profession's work around boundaries. People's journey is theirs, not mind. And their goal is set by them, not me.
"The English phrase 'care of souls' has its origins in the Latin cure animarum. While curs is most commonly translated 'care,' it actually contains the idea of both care and cure. Care refers to actions designed to support the well-being of something or someone. Cure refers to actions designed to restore well-being that has been lost." (11)
"The search is for life in God's kingdom; hurry is the devil." (12)
"At the heart of spiritual formation is becoming aware that God is everywhere and learning to practice his presence and held to his transforming grace." (14)
"journey motif for spiritual formation" - purgation (detachment, reorientation, confession, etc.), illumination ('deepening experience of the love, joy and peace of God"), union (18-20)
"Bishop Kallistos Ware notes five basic roles of the spiritual father: doctor, counselor, intercessor, mediator and sponsor." (43)
"Wesley wrote, 'Entire sanctification or Christian perfection is neither more nor less than pure love.... The Refiner's fire purges out all that is contrary to love.'" (116)
"Wesleyan-holiness theologian H. Ray Dunning speaks of sanctification as providing four freedoms: (1) freedom for God, (2) freedom for others, (3) freedom from the earth and (4) freedom from self-domination." (125)
"Linking the community, the individual, spiritual development and social action, John Donne puts it this way: 'I am involved in mankind.' Thomas Merton considers social action to be peculiarly Christian because it 'discovers religion in politics, religion in work, religion in social programs for better wages.' It is especially christocentric, 'because God became man, because every ma is potentially Christ, because Chris is our bother, and because we have no right to let our brother live in want, or in degradation, or in any form of squalor whether physical or spiritual.'" (148-149)