1.1 stars because I didn’t hate it as much as I hated Twilight which is my standard of rating bad books. It was even more poorly written but at least I liked the characters.
Tags: shifters, modern fantasy, M/M
The wording is so clunky, awkward and painful. She uses lots of trite expressions like “His head spun like top,” “the apple hadn’t fallen far from the tree,” and, “…the way a hungry man would stare at a juicy streak.” Those were just some from the first twenty pages of the book. (Who even remembers what a top is these days?)
The writing got marginally better at least—big mistake starting writing at the beginning of the story. Write some part that’s already deeply ingrained in your head then go back and write the beginning when you’ve got your footing. You need to grab your reader right away. Anyway, the writing got better but the trite expressions continued as well as tired tropes, too, like how life with the human would never be boring.
The characters are caricatures and they go through abrupt emotional changes, terrified too quiescent in a sentence. The emotions never really felt true.
It’s soooo sexist. Women can’t shapeshift. They can’t even rule; the council is all men. “The man was as light as a feather and as fragile as one of their females.” At one point, Grayson says, “…it was obvious he wasn’t missing out on all the whiney wife bullshit.” Another time when he was told the alpha’s mates did things other than work, Reagan says, “I’m not a fucking woman, Grayson!” Then when danger comes, Reagan acts like the pack believes women act when in jeopardy and hides behind his mate.
At least Grayson believes that the hierarchy is old fashioned. (It couldn’t possibly work—what if someone dies prematurely or a male child is lost in childbirth?) His belief in change seems limited to the hierarchy of men and the strange lack of concern for the omegas in their emergency plans.
(Oddly, the doctors are always female. Maybe because the job is nurturing in theory?)
Reagan for his part buys into a lot of the injustice pointing out how many humans follow in their parents footsteps (including personality types… Like there’s only one or two types per family if there are only two parents?) He completely disregards the sociology of why humans do the things they do. It sounds like he believes it’s okay that people don’t have any choices just because many humans with choices still do what their parents want. (My parents didn’t want me to do the things they did, thank goodness.) I just don’t even understand; why did the author build a world this way when the subjugation isn’t really going to even be explored more than on the very surface?
At least Grayson knew he couldn’t mate with Reagan without “full disclosure and consent.” But wait, did he? “You know what this means right? Things can never go back to the way they were,” is not full disclosure. Really boring sex too.
The climax would have been merely poor if they hadn’t gone on and on about what happened to them being so horrible. The events didn’t seem that serious at all. As a result, it felt just pathetic to me. So dumb.
In short, (finally sorry) this was unoriginal, poorly written, predictable, boring, and so sexist it made me exclaim out loud repeatedly. No, I’m not reading further in the series.