DNF, not because it's not fine for what it is, but just because I don't really need what it is. This is one of those books that Mom picked up in a bargain bin at some bookstore checkout stand, thinking in some vague terms: "My daughter is a historian, and this is a history book," but it's not a specific history or research book, just an overall introduction to (mostly European) history, beginning with the written word. It's accurate and a good overview, and it told me lots of things that I'd maybe once learned that I'd forgotten (the absolute differences between Goths vs. Ostrogoths vs. Visigoths vs. Vandals vs. Franks vs. Gauls vs. Celts vs. Lombards vs. Saxons vs. Angles, for instance), but it's just simple paragraphs and simple sentences that don't dive deep enough into any topic to be of much use to me at my "I'm only currently reading primary sources" point in research life, and it's not much deeper (if at all) than what one could glean from Wikipedia, though obviously it's ordered in an easier succinct chronology than hunting and pecking for the online pieces yourself. Since I received the tome (it really is thicker than a fist) at xmas, I'd been reading one brief section per night before bed, but at about an eighth of the way through, I'm all set. It would be excellent, however, for a middle-grader or teenager who generically likes "history" but doesn't yet know what kind.