reread aug 10, 2022:
So I reread it because I was thinking about the whole kappa-element-in-stories-thing (and wondering how important do I think deeply developed characters are to me in stories?) and Lewis just doesn’t get old. Like he expresses things so well? You know exactly what he’s talking about?
I feel so sorry for people who don’t enjoy rereading books. I get that it isn’t the same kind of pleasure for them as it is for me (and Lewis), but that’s exactly what I mean: they don’t get to experience that pleasure. They’re not built to...appreciate it. I dunno. It’s weird. Hopefully they have other compensations.
“The Parthenon and the Optative” is still the scariest, most accurate thing.
original thoughts:
I'm always amazed by how well Lewis says things that I've felt for a long time but have never known how to express or seen expressed or even hinted at. Two of my favorite Lewis essays, "On Stories" (which I had a cool discussion with my mom about, how we're basically two different types of readers) and "On Three Ways of Writing for Children" (which is just...incredible, and everyone who likes or cares about children's literature, but also just everyone, should read) are here. But a few of the other things I really appreciated:
-the tribute to Dorothy Sayers. Wow. I've only read a few Lord Peter books (and Lewis apparently had read none, not liking detective fiction), but what he said about that made me really itch to get back to reading through them. Also, I want to read her "The Mind of the Maker" more than ever now, and her other works. (Including her Dante translation.) She really must've been a lovely woman. The way Lewis describes her somewhat unique character is almost wry, quite entertaining, but in every line his affection is palpable.
-the Lord of the Rings review. You know when you have this really deep love for something, and it inspires these specific but really strong feelings, and it feels like something completely unique, and you simply can't get it into words that express the depth of it, but then someone does? That's what Lewis did here with The Lord of the Rings. I'm actually super grateful, and I felt, like, almost emotional reading it. Because he gets it. He gets the beauty of Tolkien's work. (I mean, obviously, he's Jack Lewis. But he gets it, is what I'm saying.)
-the George Orwell essay! So interesting! He talks about why he thinks Animal Farm is better than 1984, and puzzles exactly as I have often done over the greater popularity of 1984. To be sure, I've personally not read 1984, but for pretty much all the reasons Lewis gives when talking about why he thinks Animal Farm better. (He gets Animal Farm too. It's glorious.)
-"The Parthenon and the Optative." Golly. He nails, I think, the whole problem with the modern idea of "education" (which to a large degree is how I was educated, and I do not like it; I do not like the scanty amount of actual basic foundational knowledge I've been left with after having spent enough time in school, I feel like, that I could know some actual stuff) and just how we do so many things nowadays. When I took my two semesters of General Chemistry in college, I complained a lot about how dumb it was to expect kids to develop this deep intuitive knowledge of chemistry without just first, boringly, persistently, drilling the basics into them. Instead of dry basic knowledge or deep understanding, you get a nebulous, shaky-foundationed mumbo-jumbo that's neither. You get students who passed Chem and don't even remember the basics of redox reactions (and also have no idea how they passed Chem, it was a nightmare). Anyway, the same applies to literature. Lewis says it better than me. The essay's really good.
Pretty much all the essays are worth reading; those were the standouts for me. I would very much like to own this, just for "On Stories" and "On Three Ways of Writing for Children," but, like, for everything else too.