Had my hopes up after liking "The Opposite of Maybe", but it turns out it's just an 'Okay' book for me with no re-reading value, although I still like the author and am planning to read her future books. Looking back now, I can only think: "Wish the story had been as fantastic as the cover!"
But:
1. I didn't like the characters so much.
Instead, I only liked bits and parts, like:
-the strong, attention-catching beginning
-the red curly hair,
-Nina's mind getting carried away with fantasies,
-Lindy's counting tick,
-Lindy's strive to reach family perfection despite her crazy schedule (I guess busy, beautiful, workaholic Lindy who strove to feed healthy food to her children AND manage work, and thus needed ta psychologist or a yoga instructor to tell her how to relieve stress, became my favourite character right after her Morning Routine scene)
-the fact that the sisters already knew each other (so much to explore about it!)
-their mother's hard attitude, hiding love behind guilt, yet never becoming what they wished for - or, as beautifully delivered towards the end, the one who would have said comforting words to Nina was the mother who had raised her;
-the way Nina knew how not to push people to scare them away yet pushing very hard at the same time (as she said, "unconsciously forcing everyone to gather around her").
However,
-I truly disliked Carter because of his irresponsibility as a father, and I'm glad he changed philosofy in the end but I still can't see why he was a good match for Nina, she could have been happy with somebody else - I wasn't really rooting for them.
-As for Indigo...As a character, she looked realistic enough to have her own story, being more complete than other secondary characters. Yet... that's exactly why I didn't like her. This is not her story. It's like the author insistently pushed her into the main characters scenes because the author herself obviously liked her a lot, but as a reader, I wasn't convinced by the teenager who's both a hard-working student AND a rebel. It can't be both, she would either go down one path or the other. She also delivered all the helpful lines in scenes where no one else spoke, so that the plot could move on. But why would a group of capable adults need to rely on her? Why did nobody ever apart from her brother tell her she was being silly?
-Dialogues weren't engaging or realistic enough at times (I tried to picture it happening live - and sometimes it felt weird, as if the characters were reading from a script. It came out flat) I know it's not written to be a play script, but it still felt too rehearsed. Also, in scenes with multiple characters, only one of them had their actions described while the others were conveniently "inactive" (made me think that the author couldn't handle multiple characters? of course it was done on purpose, it was a 1st person pov, but still, the character could at least notice what the others were doing and show it to us instead of offering partial blindless.
-Finally, and most importantly, at the end of the book none of the characters really "stayed" with me, compared to her previous book. (Thankfully, the next one is better, which makes me glad that I decied to stick to this author.) In the end, I feel that the author created a story with so much potential but didn't fully take advantage of it. It could have turned out so much better!