hoo boy. i know people like this play, but after reading it in full, i like it less than i did directing a scene two years ago.
First off, the good: I teared up at scene 4. character interactions felt so nuanced. there’s a little bit of the supernatural which always leads to an interesting turn (for better or worse) which sets every scene apart and makes it so charming. in the stories that end bittersweet, i really feel for both characters (see: Story of Hope and Where It Went).
Here’s my problem: this show is definitely a novel adaptation and it shows. the stage directions, which sometimes border on prose pieces, hold your hand and tell you when to take a beat and the intention behind many lines. he even gives a note in the back about language, “encourage your actors to talk the way people talk.” and tells the set designers how to transition and recreate the northern lights. SIR! you’re not the director!! there’s not much room for director interpretation unless you wanna literally change the script.
ironically, it kinda feels like carliani wants you to do that. a couple times he basically goes “hey, depending on your actors, you should change this line.” also there’s literally two versions of the prologue and epilogue. it seems like carliani wants flexibile casting but it sort of comes across like cariani couldn’t decide
other thoughts: the guy who got rejected by a girl named Hope says “I lost a lotta Hope.” i might be an English major, but that’s not subtle at all. also dave would be so wholesome if he wasn’t a creep. he just starts kissing rhonda and doesn’t stop and when she goes “man, i’ve never been with anyone before,” he goes “that’s kinda neat; give me a kiss.” HUH???
i’m so sorry to those who like Almost Maine (like i said, when the show is good, it’s GOOD), but after reading this show, i’m left trying to figure out if this show is better read or seen. on paper, the author’s intentions are a little too clear, which i feel like could stifle different interpretations of the show. on the other hand, Carliani seems to be chill with certain changes to the script, which could lead to some cool interpretations? all in all, carliani feels like a backseat director in his own script.
edit: so it turns out that Cariani also wrote the book, and man it makes SO MUCH sense. this guy totally went “this is my literary baby and i want my interpretation to last but also give space for other directors but not that much space”
edit 2: so it took me 10 months to realize that Cariani wrote the book *after* he wrote the play, not before. Apologies for the misinformation, but my original point still stands.