Here are my highlights from this great book:
“Knowledge of Church history is the death of Protestantism” John Henry Newman
One cannot examine Catholicism and not develop an admiration for it – an admiration that almost invariably leads to becoming convinced of its truth. Chesterton
Early Church was ruled by bishops. Early Church history attested that the apostles had laid hands on men and installed them as bishops.
The very foundation doctrine – the doctrine of what Scripture is – we have to trust the Church since there was no way to show from within Scripture itself exactly what the books of the books of the Bible should be.
Scott Hahn’s study of Scripture led him to the conclusion that sola scriptura is not only unhistorical and unworkable, it was unbiblical. If sola scriptura is not taught in the bible and is thus self-refuting proposition. As Luther, Calvin and other Reforms claimed, if sola scriptura is false, Protestantism, as a theological response to the Catholic Church, is likewise false, since Protestantism was founded upon the idea of the Bible as the sole infallible rule of faith for the Church. Sola scriptura is a euphemism for “sola ego”. The theory of sola scriptura has done untold damage to Christendom. The most obvious evidence of this damage was Protestantism itself: a huge mass of conflicting, bickering denominations, causing by its very nature of “protest” and “defiance,” and endless proliferation of chaos and controversy. The Bible isn’t a comprehensive textbook of systematic theology - honest and sincere people could legitimately interpret the Bible in many different ways.
Explain how the Church could fulfill the Lord’s command to decide issues of authoritatively if the Church is not infallible. Given all the conflicting opinions among Protestants on essential doctrinal issues, how can you possibly say the Bible is the supreme authority when the Bible cannot interpret itself?
The Catholic Church didn’t pull its beliefs out of thin air, they are biblically based. Matthew 18:15-18: Jesus confers special authority on the hierarchy of the Church which fits the Catholic model perfectly, not the Protestant one. Church Fathers didn’t hesitate to invoke biblical authority, but they never tried to prove their case by the Bible alone. They also appealed to an authoritative Church tradition handed down through a succession of bishops that could be traced all the way back to the apostles themselves.
How could it be that Jesus would command visible unity but leave his Church without the necessarily infallible means of settling doctrinal disputes in order to maintain that unity? Protestants claim the Bible alone is the only infallible rule of faith and practice. But, ironically, it was the emphasis on the Bible alone that caused all the confusion and division within Protestantism.
“One body! One Spirit! One hope! One Lord! One faith! One baptism! One God and Father of all!” (Eph. 4:7-13) “I urge you brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions. Keep away from them.” (Rom.16:17)
I wonder how Protestantism, which has splintered into over 20,000 denominations worldwide, could be what Jesus had in mind in John 17:21, when he said that the world will know that the Father sent the Son by the unity of his disciples.